Literature DB >> 29359882

Open radical cystectomy in England: the current standard of care - an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) cystectomy audit and Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) data.

Edward R Jefferies1, Joanne Cresswell2, John S McGrath3, Catherine Miller3, Luke Hounsome4, Sarah Fowler5, Edward W Rowe6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the current standard for open radical cystectomy (ORC) in England, as data entry by surgeons performing RC to the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) database was mandated in 2013 and combining this with Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) data has allowed comprehensive outcome analysis for the first time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients were included in this analysis if they were uploaded to the BAUS data registry and reported to have been performed in the 2 years between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2015 in England (from mandate onwards) and had been documented as being performed in an open fashion (not laparoscopic, robot assisted or the technique field left blank). The HES data were accessed via the HES website. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys Classification of Surgical Operations and Procedures version 4 (OPCS-4) Code M34 was searched during the same 2-year time frame (not including M34.4 for simple cystectomy or with additional minimal access codes Y75.1-9 documenting a laparoscopic or robotic approach was used) to assess data capture.
RESULTS: A total of 2 537 ORCs were recorded in the BAUS registry and 3 043 in the HES data. This indicates a capture rate of 83.4% of all cases. The median operative time was 5 h, harvesting a median of 11-20 lymph nodes, with a median blood loss of 500-1 000 mL, and a transfusion rate of 21.8%. The median length of stay was 11 days, with a 30-day mortality rate of 1.58%.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest, contemporary cohort of ORCs in England, encompassing >80% of all performed operations. We now know the current standard for ORC in England. This provides the basis for individual surgeons and units to compare their outcomes and a standard with which future techniques and modifications can be compared.
© 2018 The Authors BJU International © 2018 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BAUS audit; bladder cancer; outcomes; radical cystectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29359882     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  7 in total

1.  Effect of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion vs Open Radical Cystectomy on 90-Day Morbidity and Mortality Among Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  James W F Catto; Pramit Khetrapal; Federico Ricciardi; Gareth Ambler; Norman R Williams; Tarek Al-Hammouri; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Ramesh Thurairaja; Rajesh Nair; Andrew Feber; Simon Dixon; Senthil Nathan; Tim Briggs; Ashwin Sridhar; Imran Ahmad; Jaimin Bhatt; Philip Charlesworth; Christopher Blick; Marcus G Cumberbatch; Syed A Hussain; Sanjeev Kotwal; Anthony Koupparis; John McGrath; Aidan P Noon; Edward Rowe; Nikhil Vasdev; Vishwanath Hanchanale; Daryl Hagan; Chris Brew-Graves; John D Kelly
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 157.335

2.  Radical Cystectomy in England from 2013 to 2019 on 12,644 patients: An analysis of national trends and comparison of surgical approaches using Hospital Episode Statistics data.

Authors:  Ashwin Sunil Tamhankar; David Thurtle; Alexander Hampson; Omar El-Taji; Ramesh Thurairaja; John D Kelly; James W F Catto; Tim Lane; James Adshead; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-03-12

3.  National database of patients treated with radical cystectomy provides a current standard and comparison for future technologies.

Authors:  Kazumasa Matsumoto
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-05

4.  Open radical cystectomy: lessons from the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) registry.

Authors:  Marta Rossanese; Enrica Subba; Gianluca Giannarini; Antonino Inferrera; Vincenzo Ficarra
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-08

5.  Development and validation of a follow-up methodology for a randomised controlled trial, utilising routine clinical data as an alternative to traditional designs: a pilot study to assess the feasibility of use for the BladderPath trial.

Authors:  Harriet P Mintz; Amandeep Dosanjh; Helen M Parsons; Ana Hughes; Alicia Jakeman; Ann M Pope; Richard T Bryan; Nicholas D James; Prashant Patel
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2020-10-31

6.  Defining Factors Associated with High-quality Surgery Following Radical Cystectomy: Analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Cystectomy Audit.

Authors:  Wei Shen Tan; Jeffrey J Leow; Maya Marchese; Ashwin Sridhar; Giles Hellawell; Matthew Mossanen; Jeremy Y C Teoh; Sarah Fowler; Alexandra J Colquhoun; Jo Cresswell; James W F Catto; Quoc-Dien Trinh; John D Kelly
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-09-20

7.  Case of the month from the University of Sheffield, UK: Expediting definitive treatment in patients with invasive bladder cancer: an MRI-guided pathway.

Authors:  Samantha Conroy; Rachel Hubbard; Aidan P Noon; Syed A Hussain; Jon Griffin; Steven Kennish; James W F Catto
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 5.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.