Literature DB >> 3472318

Parallels between frequency selectivity measured psychophysically and in cochlear mechanics.

B C Moore.   

Abstract

One of the most important features of the auditory system is its action as a frequency analyser. The frequency analysis appears to have its basis in the mechanical patterns of vibration on the basilar membrane (BM). Its properties can be measured psychophysically using masking experiments and the results explained using the concept of the auditory filter (critical bandwidth). A method of measuring the auditory filter shape at a particular centre frequency is described. This method is based upon the power-spectrum model of masking which assumes: 1) when detecting a signal in a masker the observer uses the single filter giving the highest signal-to-masker ratio; 2) threshold corresponds to a fixed signal-to-masker ratio at the output of that filter. The variation of the auditory filter bandwidth with centre frequency is described and related to measurements of the frequency-position map on the BM in man. The equivalent rectangular bandwidth (ERB) of the auditory filter corresponds approximately to a constant distance of 0.9 mm on the BM. Changes in the auditory filter shape with level are described and are shown to correspond, at least qualitatively, to input-output functions measured on the BM and in single neurones of the auditory nerve. Finally, a method is described for deriving the excitation pattern of a sound from its power spectrum, using the results of auditory-filter measurements. The excitation pattern derived in this way probably corresponds to the distribution of excitation along the BM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3472318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl        ISSN: 0107-8593


  14 in total

Review 1.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Spatial and temporal effects of interleaved masking in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon; Chris van den Honert
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-03

3.  A discontinuous tonotopic organization in the inferior colliculus of the rat.

Authors:  Manuel S Malmierca; Marco A Izquierdo; Salvatore Cristaudo; Olga Hernández; David Pérez-González; Ellen Covey; Douglas L Oliver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Toward Routine Assessments of Auditory Filter Shape.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Allison B Kern; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Human audiometric thresholds do not predict specific cellular damage in the inner ear.

Authors:  Lukas D Landegger; Demetri Psaltis; Konstantina M Stankovic
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Neural fluctuation cues for simultaneous notched-noise masking and profile-analysis tasks: Insights from model midbrain responses.

Authors:  Braden N Maxwell; Virginia M Richards; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms.

Authors:  Rohima Badri; Jonathan H Siegel; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The relationship between ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction and speech-in-noise recognition at positive and negative signal-to-noise ratios.

Authors:  Kristina DeRoy Milvae; Joshua M Alexander; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  No Benefit of Deriving Cochlear-Implant Maps From Binaural Temporal-Envelope Sensitivity for Speech Perception or Spatial Hearing Under Single-Sided Deafness.

Authors:  Coral E Dirks; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.