Literature DB >> 30846881

Estimating yields of prenatal carrier screening and implications for design of expanded carrier screening panels.

Michael H Guo1,2, Anthony R Gregg3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prenatal genetic carrier screening can identify parents at risk of having a child affected by a recessive condition. However, the conditions/genes most appropriate for screening remain a matter of debate. Estimates of carrier rates across genes are needed to guide construction of carrier screening panels.
METHOD: We leveraged an exome sequencing database (n = 123,136) to estimate carrier rates across six major ancestries for 415 genes associated with severe recessive conditions.
RESULTS: We found that 32.6% (East Asian) to 62.9% (Ashkenazi Jewish) of individuals are variant carriers in at least one of the 415 genes. For couples, screening all 415 genes would identify 0.17-2.52% of couples as being at risk for having a child affected by one of these conditions. Screening just the 40 genes with carrier rate >1.0% would identify more than 76% of these at-risk couples. An ancestry-specific panel designed to capture genes with carrier rates >1.0% would include 5 to 28 genes, while a comparable panethnic panel would include 40 genes.
CONCLUSION: Our work guides the design of carrier screening panels and provides data to assist in counseling prospective parents. Our results highlight a high cumulative carrier rate across genes, underscoring the need for careful selection of genes for screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mendelian disorder; exome sequencing; expanded carrier screening; genetic counseling; pathogenic variants

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30846881     DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0472-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  16 in total

1.  Equitable Expanded Carrier Screening Needs Indigenous Clinical and Population Genomic Data.

Authors:  Simon Easteal; Ruth M Arkell; Renzo F Balboa; Shayne A Bellingham; Alex D Brown; Tom Calma; Matthew C Cook; Megan Davis; Hugh J S Dawkins; Marcel E Dinger; Michael S Dobbie; Ashley Farlow; Kylie G Gwynne; Azure Hermes; Wendy E Hoy; Misty R Jenkins; Simon H Jiang; Warren Kaplan; Stephen Leslie; Bastien Llamas; Graham J Mann; Brendan J McMorran; Rebekah E McWhirter; Cliff J Meldrum; Shivashankar H Nagaraj; Saul J Newman; Jack S Nunn; Lyndon Ormond-Parker; Neil J Orr; Devashi Paliwal; Hardip R Patel; Glenn Pearson; Greg R Pratt; Boe Rambaldini; Lynette W Russell; Ravi Savarirayan; Matthew Silcocks; John C Skinner; Yassine Souilmi; Carola G Vinuesa; Gareth Baynam
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Considerations of expanded carrier screening: Lessons learned from combined malonic and methylmalonic aciduria.

Authors:  Marie Cosette Gabriel; Stephanie M Rice; Jennifer L Sloan; Matthew H Mossayebi; Charles P Venditti; Huda B Al-Kouatly
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.183

3.  Exploring the use of a Comic for Education about Expanded Carrier Screening among a Diverse Group of Mothers.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Sydney Cheek-O'Donnell; Erin Johnson; Alena Wilson; Rebecca A Anderson; Jeffrey Botkin
Journal:  J Commun Healthc       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 4.  Supporting Patient Autonomy and Informed Decision-Making in Prenatal Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Katie Stoll; Judith Jackson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.159

5.  Screening for autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions during pregnancy and preconception: a practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Anthony R Gregg; Mahmoud Aarabi; Susan Klugman; Natalia T Leach; Michael T Bashford; Tamar Goldwaser; Emily Chen; Teresa N Sparks; Honey V Reddi; Aleksandar Rajkovic; Jeffrey S Dungan
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 8.864

6.  Evaluation and classification of severity for 176 genes on an expanded carrier screening panel.

Authors:  Aishwarya Arjunan; Holly Bellerose; Raul Torres; Rotem Ben-Shachar; Jodi D Hoffman; Brad Angle; Robert Nathan Slotnick; Brittany N Simpson; Andrea M Lewis; Pilar L Magoulas; Kelly Bontempo; Jeanine Schulze; Jennifer Tarpinian; Jessica A Bucher; Richard Dineen; Allison Goetsch; Gabriel A Lazarin; Katherine Johansen Taber
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Expanded carrier screening in Chinese patients seeking the help of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Yanping Xi; Guangquan Chen; Caixia Lei; Junping Wu; Shuo Zhang; Min Xiao; Wenbi Zhang; Yueping Zhang; Xiaoxi Sun
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.183

8.  Multisite Evaluation and Validation of a Sensitive Diagnostic and Screening System for Spinal Muscular Atrophy that Reports SMN1 and SMN2 Copy Number, along with Disease Modifier and Gene Duplication Variants.

Authors:  John N Milligan; Jessica L Larson; Stela Filipovic-Sadic; Walairat Laosinchai-Wolf; Ya-Wen Huang; Tsang-Ming Ko; Kristin M Abbott; Henny H Lemmink; Minna Toivonen; Johanna Schleutker; Caren Gentile; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; Huiping Zhu; Gary J Latham
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 5.341

9.  Reinterpretation of common pathogenic variants in ClinVar revealed a high proportion of downgrades.

Authors:  Jiale Xiang; Jiyun Yang; Lisha Chen; Qiang Chen; Haiyan Yang; Chengcheng Sun; Qing Zhou; Zhiyu Peng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Clinical Implementation of Expanded Carrier Screening in Pregnant Women at Early Gestational Weeks: A Chinese Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mengmeng Shi; Angeline Linna Liauw; Steve Tong; Yu Zheng; Tak Yeung Leung; Shuk Ching Chong; Ye Cao; Tze Kin Lau; Kwong Wai Choy; Jacqueline P W Chung
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.