Literature DB >> 29754767

Preconception Carrier Screening by Genome Sequencing: Results from the Clinical Laboratory.

Sumit Punj1, Yassmine Akkari1, Jennifer Huang1, Fei Yang1, Allison Creason1, Christine Pak1, Amiee Potter1, Michael O Dorschner2, Deborah A Nickerson3, Peggy D Robertson3, Gail P Jarvik4, Laura M Amendola5, Jennifer Schleit6, Dana Kostiner Simpson7, Alan F Rope7, Jacob Reiss8, Tia Kauffman8, Marian J Gilmore7, Patricia Himes7, Benjamin Wilfond9, Katrina A B Goddard8, C Sue Richards10.   

Abstract

Advances in sequencing technologies permit the analysis of a larger selection of genes for preconception carrier screening. The study was designed as a sequential carrier screen using genome sequencing to analyze 728 gene-disorder pairs for carrier and medically actionable conditions in 131 women and their partners (n = 71) who were planning a pregnancy. We report here on the clinical laboratory results from this expanded carrier screening program. Variants were filtered and classified using the latest American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guideline; only pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were confirmed by orthologous methods before being reported. Novel missense variants were classified as variants of uncertain significance. We reported 304 variants in 202 participants. Twelve carrier couples (12/71 couples tested) were identified for common conditions; eight were carriers for hereditary hemochromatosis. Although both known and novel variants were reported, 48% of all reported variants were missense. For novel splice-site variants, RNA-splicing assays were performed to aid in classification. We reported ten copy-number variants and five variants in non-coding regions. One novel variant was reported in F8, associated with hemophilia A; prenatal testing showed that the male fetus harbored this variant and the neonate suffered a life-threatening hemorrhage which was anticipated and appropriately managed. Moreover, 3% of participants had variants that were medically actionable. Compared with targeted mutation screening, genome sequencing improves the sensitivity of detecting clinically significant variants. While certain novel variant interpretation remains challenging, the ACMG guidelines are useful to classify variants in a healthy population.
Copyright © 2018 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carrier couples; genome sequencing; medically actionable conditions; preconception carrier screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29754767      PMCID: PMC5992121          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  50 in total

1.  Rapid detection of alpha-thalassaemia deletions and alpha-globin gene triplication by multiplex polymerase chain reactions.

Authors:  Y T Liu; J M Old; K Miles; C A Fisher; D J Weatherall; J B Clegg
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  The human genome browser at UCSC.

Authors:  W James Kent; Charles W Sugnet; Terrence S Furey; Krishna M Roskin; Tom H Pringle; Alan M Zahler; David Haussler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Advantages of expanded universal carrier screening: what is at stake?

Authors:  Sanne van der Hout; Kim Ca Holtkamp; Lidewij Henneman; Guido de Wert; Wybo J Dondorp
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources.

Authors:  Helen V Firth; Shola M Richards; A Paul Bevan; Stephen Clayton; Manuel Corpas; Diana Rajan; Steven Van Vooren; Yves Moreau; Roger M Pettett; Nigel P Carter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Carrier screening in the era of expanding genetic technology.

Authors:  Aishwarya Arjunan; Karen Litwack; Nick Collins; Joel Charrow
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification.

Authors:  Laura M Amendola; Michael O Dorschner; Peggy D Robertson; Joseph S Salama; Ragan Hart; Brian H Shirts; Mitzi L Murray; Mari J Tokita; Carlos J Gallego; Daniel Seung Kim; James T Bennett; David R Crosslin; Jane Ranchalis; Kelly L Jones; Elisabeth A Rosenthal; Ella R Jarvik; Andy Itsara; Emily H Turner; Daniel S Herman; Jennifer Schleit; Amber Burt; Seema M Jamal; Jenica L Abrudan; Andrew D Johnson; Laura K Conlin; Matthew C Dulik; Avni Santani; Danielle R Metterville; Melissa Kelly; Ann Katherine M Foreman; Kristy Lee; Kent D Taylor; Xiuqing Guo; Kristy Crooks; Lesli A Kiedrowski; Leslie J Raffel; Ora Gordon; Kalotina Machini; Robert J Desnick; Leslie G Biesecker; Steven A Lubitz; Surabhi Mulchandani; Greg M Cooper; Steven Joffe; C Sue Richards; Yaoping Yang; Jerome I Rotter; Stephen S Rich; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jonathan S Berg; Nancy B Spinner; James P Evans; Stephanie M Fullerton; Kathleen A Leppig; Robin L Bennett; Thomas Bird; Virginia P Sybert; William M Grady; Holly K Tabor; Jerry H Kim; Michael J Bamshad; Benjamin Wilfond; Arno G Motulsky; C Ronald Scott; Colin C Pritchard; Tom D Walsh; Wylie Burke; Wendy H Raskind; Peter Byers; Fuki M Hisama; Heidi Rehm; Debbie A Nickerson; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 7.  Advantages of genome sequencing by long-read sequencer using SMRT technology in medical area.

Authors:  Kazuma Nakano; Akino Shiroma; Makiko Shimoji; Hinako Tamotsu; Noriko Ashimine; Shun Ohki; Misuzu Shinzato; Maiko Minami; Tetsuhiro Nakanishi; Kuniko Teruya; Kazuhito Satou; Takashi Hirano
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.174

8.  Is "incidental finding" the best term?: a study of patients' preferences.

Authors:  Nina Tan; Laura M Amendola; Julianne M O'Daniel; Amber Burt; Martha J Horike-Pyne; Lacey Boshe; Gail E Henderson; Christine Rini; Myra I Roche; Fuki M Hisama; Wylie Burke; Benjamin Wilfond; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes.

Authors:  Sarah B Ng; Emily H Turner; Peggy D Robertson; Steven D Flygare; Abigail W Bigham; Choli Lee; Tristan Shaffer; Michelle Wong; Arindam Bhattacharjee; Evan E Eichler; Michael Bamshad; Deborah A Nickerson; Jay Shendure
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-08-16       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Wayne W Grody; Sarah S Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Christa L Martin; Amy L McGuire; Robert L Nussbaum; Julianne M O'Daniel; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Michael S Watson; Marc S Williams; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  10 in total

1.  Probability of high-risk genetic matching with oocyte and semen donors: complete gene analysis or genotyping test?

Authors:  Marta Molina Romero; Alberto Yoldi Chaure; Miguel Gañán Parra; Purificación Navas Bastida; José Luis Del Pico Sánchez; Ángel Vaquero Argüelles; Paloma de la Fuente Vaquero; Juan Pablo Ramírez López; José Antonio Castilla Alcalá
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Genomic Sequencing for Newborn Screening: Results of the NC NEXUS Project.

Authors:  Tamara S Roman; Stephanie B Crowley; Myra I Roche; Ann Katherine M Foreman; Julianne M O'Daniel; Bryce A Seifert; Kristy Lee; Alicia Brandt; Chelsea Gustafson; Daniela M DeCristo; Natasha T Strande; Lori Ramkissoon; Laura V Milko; Phillips Owen; Sayanty Roy; Mai Xiong; Ryan S Paquin; Rita M Butterfield; Megan A Lewis; Katherine J Souris; Donald B Bailey; Christine Rini; Jessica K Booker; Bradford C Powell; Karen E Weck; Cynthia M Powell; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Exploring the use of a Comic for Education about Expanded Carrier Screening among a Diverse Group of Mothers.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Sydney Cheek-O'Donnell; Erin Johnson; Alena Wilson; Rebecca A Anderson; Jeffrey Botkin
Journal:  J Commun Healthc       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 4.  Bridging the Gap between Scientific Advancement and Real-World Application: Pediatric Genetic Counseling for Common Syndromes and Single-Gene Disorders.

Authors:  Julie A McGlynn; Elinor Langfelder-Schwind
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.159

5.  Clinical Utility of Medical Exome Sequencing: Expanded Carrier Screening for Patients Seeking Assisted Reproductive Technology in China.

Authors:  Keya Tong; Wenbin He; Yao He; Xiurong Li; Liang Hu; Hao Hu; Guangxiu Lu; Ge Lin; Chang Dong; Victor Wei Zhang; Juan Du; Dongyun Liu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Multisite Evaluation and Validation of a Sensitive Diagnostic and Screening System for Spinal Muscular Atrophy that Reports SMN1 and SMN2 Copy Number, along with Disease Modifier and Gene Duplication Variants.

Authors:  John N Milligan; Jessica L Larson; Stela Filipovic-Sadic; Walairat Laosinchai-Wolf; Ya-Wen Huang; Tsang-Ming Ko; Kristin M Abbott; Henny H Lemmink; Minna Toivonen; Johanna Schleutker; Caren Gentile; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; Huiping Zhu; Gary J Latham
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 5.341

7.  A case for expanding carrier testing to include actionable X-linked disorders.

Authors:  Alan F Rope; Tia L Kauffman; Pat Himes; Laura M Amendola; Sumit Punj; Yassmine Akkari; Amiee Potter; James V Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Jacob A Reiss; Mari J Gilmore; Carmit K McMullen; Deborah A Nickerson; C Sue Richards; Gail P Jarvik; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2018-09-19

8.  Optimizing clinical exome design and parallel gene-testing for recessive genetic conditions in preconception carrier screening: Translational research genomic data from 14,125 exomes.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Roberto Alonso Valero; Jorge Jimenez-Almazan; Pere Mir Pardo; Marco Fabiani; David Jiménez; Carlos Simon; Julio Martin Rodriguez
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 9.  The evolving landscape of expanded carrier screening: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kraft; Devan Duenas; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Current Updates on Expanded Carrier Screening: New Insights in the Omics Era.

Authors:  Iolanda Veneruso; Chiara Di Resta; Rossella Tomaiuolo; Valeria D'Argenio
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.