Literature DB >> 11958247

Effect of parental education on decision-making about neonatal circumcision.

Sharon L Binner1, Joan M Mastrobattista, Mary-Clare Day, Laurie S Swaim, Manju Monga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of unbiased, published, easily accessible brochures on the parental decision about circumcision.
METHODS: A total of 190 women who were delivered of healthy male infants at Memorial-Hermann Hospital and Woman's Hospital of Texas from December 1, 1999, to April 30, 2000, were asked to complete a brief demographic self-description and questionnaire regarding their attitudes and beliefs about circumcision. The most recent American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) brochure about circumcision was then distributed, and subjects completed the questionnaire a second time after reading the brochure.
RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of participants opted for circumcision. No woman altered her decision on the basis of information in the AAP brochure. Regardless of parental desire for circumcision, responses to all questions before and after distribution of the AAP brochure were highly correlated. Circumcision status of the father and the parents' education and age were significantly associated with the decision to circumcise. There was no significant association between this decision and marital status, race, or religion.
CONCLUSIONS: Parental education about the medical indications and possible risks of circumcision has no impact on the decision-making process about neonatal circumcision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11958247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  9 in total

1.  Circumcision for all: the pro side.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Houle
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Designing family-centered male circumcision services: a conjoint analysis approach.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; Sarah C Searle; Frederic W Selck; Neil A Martinson
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Attitudes and decision making about neonatal male circumcision in a Hispanic population in New York City.

Authors:  Gabriela M Bisono; Lisa Simmons; Robert J Volk; Dodi Meyer; Thomas C Quinn; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 1.168

Review 4.  Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision.

Authors:  Marcus C Tye; Lauren M Sardi
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.896

5.  Decision-Making Regarding Newborn Circumcision: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Allison M Morgan; Yue-Yung Hu; Andrea Benin; Gina M Lockwood
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-10-28

6.  A Systematic Review of Race/Ethnicity and Parental Treatment Decision-Making.

Authors:  Vandra C Harris; Anne R Links; Jonathan Walsh; Desi P Schoo; Andrew H Lee; David E Tunkel; Emily F Boss
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 1.168

7.  Shared Decision Making for Routine Infant Circumcision: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Teri M Mitchell; Claudia Beal
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2015

Review 8.  Woman and girl-centred care for those affected by female genital mutilation: a scoping review of provider tools and guidelines.

Authors:  Angela Dawson; Anisa Assifi; Sabera Turkmani
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.223

9.  Parental decision making in male circumcision.

Authors:  Lauren Sardi; Kathy Livingston
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.412

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.