Literature DB >> 24820907

Rates of adverse events associated with male circumcision in U.S. medical settings, 2001 to 2010.

Charbel El Bcheraoui1, Xinjian Zhang2, Christopher S Cooper3, Charles E Rose2, Peter H Kilmarx2, Robert T Chen2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Approximately 1.4 million male circumcisions (MCs) are performed annually in US medical settings. However, population-based estimates of MC-associated adverse events (AEs) are lacking.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence rate of MC-associated AEs and to assess whether AE rates differed by age at circumcision.
DESIGN: We selected 41 possible MC AEs based on a literature review and on medical billing codes. We estimated a likely risk window for the incidence calculation for each MC AE based on pathogenesis. We used 2001 to 2010 data from SDI Health, a large administrative claims data set, to conduct a retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: SDI Health provided administrative claims data from inpatient and outpatient US medical settings. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: For each AE, we calculated the incidence per million MCs. We compared the incidence risk ratio and the incidence rate difference for circumcised vs uncircumcised newborn males and for males circumcised at younger than 1 year, age 1 to 9 years, or 10 years or older. An AE was considered probably related to MC if the incidence risk ratio significantly exceeded 1 at P < .05 or occurred only in circumcised males.
RESULTS: Records were available for 1,400,920 circumcised males, 93.3% as newborns. Of 41 possible MC AEs, 16 (39.0%) were probable. The incidence of total MC AEs was slightly less than 0.5%. Rates of potentially serious MC AEs ranged from 0.76 (95% CI, 0.10-5.43) per million MCs for stricture of male genital organs to 703.23 (95% CI, 659.22-750.18) per million MCs for repair of incomplete circumcision. Compared with boys circumcised at younger than 1 year, the incidences of probable AEs were approximately 20-fold and 10-fold greater for males circumcised at age 1 to 9 years and at 10 years or older, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Male circumcision had a low incidence of AEs overall, especially if the procedure was performed during the first year of life, but rose 10-fold to 20-fold when performed after infancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24820907      PMCID: PMC4578797          DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Pediatr        ISSN: 2168-6203            Impact factor:   16.193


  31 in total

1.  Significantly increased complication risks with mass circumcisions.

Authors:  E Ozdemir
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1997-07

Review 2.  Traditional male circumcision in eastern and southern Africa: a systematic review of prevalence and complications.

Authors:  Andrea Wilcken; Thomas Keil; Bruce Dick
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Incidence of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Robert S Van Howe
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.168

4.  Male circumcision in the United States for the prevention of HIV infection and other adverse health outcomes: report from a CDC consultation.

Authors:  Dawn K Smith; Allan Taylor; Peter H Kilmarx; Patrick Sullivan; Lee Warner; Mary Kamb; Naomi Bock; Bos Kohmescher; Timothy D Mastro
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Safety of the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine among children: a population-based study.

Authors:  Eric K France; Jason M Glanz; Stanley Xu; Robert L Davis; Steven B Black; Henry R Shinefield; Kenneth M Zangwill; S Michael Marcy; John P Mullooly; Lisa A Jackson; Robert Chen
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2004-11

6.  Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ronald H Gray; Godfrey Kigozi; David Serwadda; Frederick Makumbi; Stephen Watya; Fred Nalugoda; Noah Kiwanuka; Lawrence H Moulton; Mohammad A Chaudhary; Michael Z Chen; Nelson K Sewankambo; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Melanie C Bacon; Carolyn F M Williams; Pius Opendi; Steven J Reynolds; Oliver Laeyendecker; Thomas C Quinn; Maria J Wawer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert C Bailey; Stephen Moses; Corette B Parker; Kawango Agot; Ian Maclean; John N Krieger; Carolyn F M Williams; Richard T Campbell; Jeckoniah O Ndinya-Achola
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Between prophylaxis and child abuse: the ethics of neonatal male circumcision.

Authors:  Michael Benatar; David Benatar
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.229

9.  The safety of adult male circumcision in HIV-infected and uninfected men in Rakai, Uganda.

Authors:  Godfrey Kigozi; Ronald H Gray; Maria J Wawer; David Serwadda; Frederick Makumbi; Stephen Watya; Fred Nalugoda; Noah Kiwanuka; Lawrence H Moulton; Michael Z Chen; Nelson K Sewankambo; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Melanie C Bacon; Renee Ridzon; Pius Opendi; Victor Sempijja; Absolom Settuba; Denis Buwembo; Valerian Kiggundu; Margaret Anyokorit; James Nkale; Nehemia Kighoma; Blake Charvat
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Circumcision complications associated with the Plastibell device and conventional dissection surgery: a trial of 586 infants of ages up to 12 months.

Authors:  Seyed Abdollah Mousavi; Ebrahim Salehifar
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2008-11-04
View more
  26 in total

1.  In reply.

Authors:  Charbel El Bcheraoui; Kenneth L Dominguez; Peter H Kilmarx
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 2.  Prepuce health and childhood circumcision: Choices in Canada.

Authors:  Emmanuel O Abara
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  When Religion and Medicine Clash: Non-beneficial Treatments and Hope for a Miracle.

Authors:  Philip M Rosoff
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2019-06

4.  Scientific evidence dispels false claims about circumcision.

Authors:  Brian J Morris
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Impact of Health Insurance Type on Trends in Newborn Circumcision, United States, 2000 to 2010.

Authors:  Lee Warner; Shanna Cox; Maura Whiteman; Denise J Jamieson; Maurizio Macaluso; Pooja Bansil; Elena Kuklina; Athena P Kourtis; Samuel Posner; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Is Physical Alteration a Sufficient Reason to Prohibit Ritual Infant Circumcision?

Authors:  Allan J Jacobs
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-01-03

7.  Incorporation of Social Determinants of Health in the Peer-Reviewed Literature: A Systematic Review of Articles Authored by the National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention.

Authors:  Eleanor E Friedman; Hazel D Dean; Wayne A Duffus
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Critical evaluation of unscientific arguments disparaging affirmative infant male circumcision policy.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; John N Krieger; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2016-08-08

Review 9.  Circumcision in childhood and male sexual function: a blessing or a curse?

Authors:  Beatriz Bañuelos Marco; Jessica Leigh García Heil
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.896

10.  Decline in Frequency of Newborn Male Circumcision After Change in Medicaid Coverage Status in Selected States in the United States.

Authors:  Taron Torosian; Joshua J Quint; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.