Literature DB >> 34704754

Flexible CDOCKER: Hybrid Searching Algorithm and Scoring Function with Side Chain Conformational Entropy.

Yujin Wu1, Charles L Brooks1,2.   

Abstract

The binding of small-molecule ligands to protein or nucleic acid targets is important to numerous biological processes. Accurate prediction of the binding modes between a ligand and a macromolecule is of fundamental importance in structure-based structure-function exploration. When multiple ligands with different sizes are docked to a target receptor, it is reasonable to assume that the residues in the binding pocket may adopt alternative conformations upon interacting with the different ligands. In addition, it has been suggested that the entropic contribution to binding can be important. However, only a few attempts to include the side chain conformational entropy upon binding within the application of flexible receptor docking methodology exist. Here, we propose a new physics-based scoring function that includes both enthalpic and entropic contributions upon binding by considering the conformational variability of the flexible side chains within the ensemble of docked poses. We also describe a novel hybrid searching algorithm that combines both molecular dynamics (MD)-based simulated annealing and genetic algorithm crossovers to address the enhanced sampling of the increased search space. We demonstrate improved accuracy in flexible cross-docking experiments compared with rigid cross-docking. We test our developments by considering five protein targets, thrombin, dihydrofolate reductase(DHFR), T4 L99A, T4 L99A/M102Q, and PDE10A, which belong to different enzyme classes with different binding pocket environments, as a representative set of diverse ligands and receptors. Each target contains dozens of different ligands bound to the same binding pocket. We also demonstrate that this flexible docking algorithm may be applicable to RNA docking with a representative riboswitch example. Our findings show significant improvements in top ranking accuracy across this set, with the largest improvement relative to rigid, 23.64%, occurring for ligands binding to DHFR. We then evaluate the ability to identify lead compounds among a large chemical space for the proposed flexible receptor docking algorithm using a subset of the DUD-E containing receptor targets MCR, GCR, and ANDR. We demonstrate that our new algorithms show improved performance in modeling flexible binding site residues compared to DOCK. Finally, we select the T4 L99A and T4 L99A/M102Q decoy sets, containing dozens of binders and experimentally validated nonbinders, to test our approach in distinguishing binders from nonbinders. We illustrate that our new algorithms for searching and scoring have superior performance to rigid receptor CDOCKER as well as AutoDock Vina. Finally, we suggest that flexible CDOCKER is sufficiently fast to be utilized in high-throughput docking screens in the context of hierarchical approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34704754      PMCID: PMC8684595          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   6.162


  60 in total

1.  Validation of automated docking programs for docking and database screening against RNA drug targets.

Authors:  Carsten Detering; Gabriele Varani
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Validation of an empirical RNA-ligand scoring function for fast flexible docking using Ribodock.

Authors:  S David Morley; Mohammad Afshar
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications.

Authors:  Douglas B Kitchen; Hélène Decornez; John R Furr; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading.

Authors:  Oleg Trott; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 5.  Challenges and advances in computational docking: 2009 in review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Yuriev; Mark Agostino; Paul A Ramsland
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.137

6.  Interplay between Conformational Entropy and Solvation Entropy in Protein-Ligand Binding.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Verteramo; Olof Stenström; Majda Misini Ignjatović; Octav Caldararu; Martin A Olsson; Francesco Manzoni; Hakon Leffler; Esko Oksanen; Derek T Logan; Ulf J Nilsson; Ulf Ryde; Mikael Akke
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Hydrogen Bonding of 1,2-Azaborines in the Binding Cavity of T4 Lysozyme Mutants: Structures and Thermodynamics.

Authors:  Hyelee Lee; Marcus Fischer; Brian K Shoichet; Shih-Yuan Liu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  A machine learning-based method to improve docking scoring functions and its application to drug repurposing.

Authors:  Sarah L Kinnings; Nina Liu; Peter J Tonge; Richard M Jackson; Lei Xie; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Rosetta FlexPepDock ab-initio: simultaneous folding, docking and refinement of peptides onto their receptors.

Authors:  Barak Raveh; Nir London; Lior Zimmerman; Ora Schueler-Furman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.

Authors:  Pradeep Anand Ravindranath; Stefano Forli; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson; Michel F Sanner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.