Literature DB >> 30618244

Interplay between Conformational Entropy and Solvation Entropy in Protein-Ligand Binding.

Maria Luisa Verteramo1, Olof Stenström2, Majda Misini Ignjatović3, Octav Caldararu3, Martin A Olsson3, Francesco Manzoni4, Hakon Leffler5, Esko Oksanen6, Derek T Logan4, Ulf J Nilsson1, Ulf Ryde3, Mikael Akke2.   

Abstract

Understanding the driving forces underlying molecular recognition is of fundamental importance in chemistry and biology. The challenge is to unravel the binding thermodynamics into separate contributions and to interpret these in molecular terms. Entropic contributions to the free energy of binding are particularly difficult to assess in this regard. Here we pinpoint the molecular determinants underlying differences in ligand affinity to the carbohydrate recognition domain of galectin-3, using a combination of isothermal titration calorimetry, X-ray crystallography, NMR relaxation, and molecular dynamics simulations followed by conformational entropy and grid inhomogeneous solvation theory (GIST) analyses. Using a pair of diastereomeric ligands that have essentially identical chemical potential in the unbound state, we reduced the problem of dissecting the thermodynamics to a comparison of the two protein-ligand complexes. While the free energies of binding are nearly equal for the R and S diastereomers, greater differences are observed for the enthalpy and entropy, which consequently exhibit compensatory behavior, ΔΔ H°(R - S) = -5 ± 1 kJ/mol and - TΔΔ S°(R - S) = 3 ± 1 kJ/mol. NMR relaxation experiments and molecular dynamics simulations indicate that the protein in complex with the S-stereoisomer has greater conformational entropy than in the R-complex. GIST calculations reveal additional, but smaller, contributions from solvation entropy, again in favor of the S-complex. Thus, conformational entropy apparently dominates over solvation entropy in dictating the difference in the overall entropy of binding. This case highlights an interplay between conformational entropy and solvation entropy, pointing to both opportunities and challenges in drug design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30618244     DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b11099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  24 in total

1.  Increased Molecular Flexibility Widens the Gap between K i and K d values in Screening for Retinoid X Receptor Modulators.

Authors:  Masaki Watanabe; Mariko Nakamura-Nakayama; Michiko Fujihara; Mayu Kawasaki; Shogo Nakano; Hiroki Kakuta
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Exploring Glycan Binding Specificity of Odorranalectin by Alanine Scanning Library.

Authors:  YashoNandini Singh; Predrag Cudic; Maré Cudic
Journal:  European J Org Chem       Date:  2022-04-22

3.  Comparison of Grand Canonical and Conventional Molecular Dynamics Simulation Methods for Protein-Bound Water Networks.

Authors:  Vilhelm Ekberg; Marley L Samways; Majda Misini Ignjatović; Jonathan W Essex; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  ACS Phys Chem Au       Date:  2022-02-11

4.  Flexible CDOCKER: Hybrid Searching Algorithm and Scoring Function with Side Chain Conformational Entropy.

Authors:  Yujin Wu; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 6.162

5.  Conformational heterogeneity of Savinase from NMR, HDX-MS and X-ray diffraction analysis.

Authors:  Shanshan Wu; Tam T T N Nguyen; Olga V Moroz; Johan P Turkenburg; Jens E Nielsen; Keith S Wilson; Kasper D Rand; Kaare Teilum
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Minimizing the Entropy Penalty for Ligand Binding: Lessons from the Molecular Recognition of the Histo Blood-Group Antigens by Human Galectin-3.

Authors:  Ana Gimeno; Sandra Delgado; Pablo Valverde; Sara Bertuzzi; Manuel Alvaro Berbís; Javier Echavarren; Alessandra Lacetera; Sonsoles Martín-Santamaría; Avadhesha Surolia; Francisco Javier Cañada; Jesus Jiménez-Barbero; Ana Ardá
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 7.  Melting Down Protein Stability: PAPS Synthase 2 in Patients and in a Cellular Environment.

Authors:  Oliver Brylski; Simon Ebbinghaus; Jonathan W Mueller
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2019-05-03

8.  Hydration of Aromatic Heterocycles as an Adversary of π-Stacking.

Authors:  Johannes R Loeffler; Michael Schauperl; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 6.162

9.  Some thermodynamic effects of varying nonpolar surfaces in protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  David L Cramer; Bo Cheng; Jianhua Tian; John H Clements; Rachel M Wypych; Stephen F Martin
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 6.514

10.  STACKED - Solvation Theory of Aromatic Complexes as Key for Estimating Drug Binding.

Authors:  Johannes R Loeffler; Monica L Fernández-Quintero; Michael Schauperl; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.