BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe mental disorder, characterized by prominent mood swings and emotion regulation (ER) deficits. The uncinate fasciculus (UF), a white matter tract connecting the amygdala and the ventral prefrontal cortex, has been implicated in ER. Aberrancies in UF microstructure may be an endophenotype associated with increased risk for BD. However, studies in individuals with BD and their first-degree relatives (REL) have yielded inconsistent findings. This meta-analysis takes a region-of-interest approach to consolidate the available evidence and elucidate the role of the UF in the risk-architecture of BD. METHODS: Using web-based search engines, we identified diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies focusing on the left and right UF and conducted meta-analyses comparing fractional anisotropy (FA) and radial diffusivity (RD) between BD or REL and healthy control participants (HC). RESULTS: We included 32 studies (nBD=1186, nREL=289, nHC=2315). Compared to HC, individuals with BD showed lower FA in the right (WMD=-0.31, p<0.0001) and left UF (WMD=-0.21, p = 0.010), and higher RD in the right UF (WMD=0.32, p = 0.009). We found no significant differences between REL and HC. In the right but not left UF, REL showed higher FA than BD (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Our findings support aberrant UF microstructure, potentially related to alterations in myelination, as a mechanism, but not as an endophenotype of BD. However, given the limited power in the REL subsample, the latter finding must be considered preliminary. Studies examining the role of the UF in individuals at familial risk for BD are warranted.
BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe mental disorder, characterized by prominent mood swings and emotion regulation (ER) deficits. The uncinate fasciculus (UF), a white matter tract connecting the amygdala and the ventral prefrontal cortex, has been implicated in ER. Aberrancies in UF microstructure may be an endophenotype associated with increased risk for BD. However, studies in individuals with BD and their first-degree relatives (REL) have yielded inconsistent findings. This meta-analysis takes a region-of-interest approach to consolidate the available evidence and elucidate the role of the UF in the risk-architecture of BD. METHODS: Using web-based search engines, we identified diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies focusing on the left and right UF and conducted meta-analyses comparing fractional anisotropy (FA) and radial diffusivity (RD) between BD or REL and healthy control participants (HC). RESULTS: We included 32 studies (nBD=1186, nREL=289, nHC=2315). Compared to HC, individuals with BD showed lower FA in the right (WMD=-0.31, p<0.0001) and left UF (WMD=-0.21, p = 0.010), and higher RD in the right UF (WMD=0.32, p = 0.009). We found no significant differences between REL and HC. In the right but not left UF, REL showed higher FA than BD (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Our findings support aberrant UF microstructure, potentially related to alterations in myelination, as a mechanism, but not as an endophenotype of BD. However, given the limited power in the REL subsample, the latter finding must be considered preliminary. Studies examining the role of the UF in individuals at familial risk for BD are warranted.
Authors: P Kochunov; D C Glahn; J L Lancaster; A M Winkler; S Smith; P M Thompson; L Almasy; R Duggirala; P T Fox; J Blangero Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-01-29 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Daniel F Hermens; Sean N Hatton; Rico S C Lee; Sharon L Naismith; Shantel L Duffy; G Paul Amminger; Manreena Kaur; Elizabeth M Scott; Jim Lagopoulos; Ian B Hickie Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Kathleen R Merikangas; Robert Jin; Jian-Ping He; Ronald C Kessler; Sing Lee; Nancy A Sampson; Maria Carmen Viana; Laura Helena Andrade; Chiyi Hu; Elie G Karam; Maria Ladea; Maria Elena Medina-Mora; Yutaka Ono; Jose Posada-Villa; Rajesh Sagar; J Elisabeth Wells; Zahari Zarkov Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2011-03
Authors: A Sarıçiçek; N Zorlu; N Yalın; C Hıdıroğlu; B Çavuşoğlu; D Ceylan; E Ada; Z Tunca; A Özerdem Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Emma Sprooten; Margaret S Brumbaugh; Emma E M Knowles; D Reese McKay; John Lewis; Jennifer Barrett; Stefanie Landau; Lindsay Cyr; Peter Kochunov; Anderson M Winkler; Godfrey D Pearlson; David C Glahn Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Sanja Budisavljevic; Jamie M Kawadler; Flavio Dell'Acqua; Frühling V Rijsdijk; Fergus Kane; Marco Picchioni; Philip McGuire; Timothea Toulopoulou; Anna Georgiades; Sridevi Kalidindi; Eugenia Kravariti; Robin M Murray; Declan G Murphy; Michael C Craig; Marco Catani Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: L Emsell; C Chaddock; N Forde; W Van Hecke; G J Barker; A Leemans; S Sunaert; M Walshe; E Bramon; D Cannon; R Murray; C McDonald Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Daria A Kamaeva; Liudmila P Smirnova; Svetlana N Vasilieva; Daria V Kazantseva; Alisa R Vasilieva; Svetlana A Ivanova Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-07-02 Impact factor: 6.208