OBJECTIVE: Several lines of evidence indicate that white matter integrity is compromised in bipolar disorder, but the nature, extent, and biological causes remain elusive. To determine the extent to which white matter deficits in bipolar disorder are familial, the authors investigated white matter integrity in a large sample of bipolar patients, unaffected siblings, and healthy comparison subjects. METHOD: The authors collected diffusion imaging data for 64 adult bipolar patients, 60 unaffected siblings (including 54 discordant sibling pairs), and 46 demographically matched comparison subjects. Fractional anisotropy was compared between the groups using voxel-wise tract-based spatial statistics and by extracting mean fractional anisotropy from 10 regions of interest. Additionally, intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated between the sibling pairs as an index of familiality. RESULTS: Widespread fractional anisotropy reductions in bipolar patients (>40,000 voxels) and more subtle reductions in their siblings, mainly restricted to the corpus callosum, posterior thalamic radiations, and left superior longitudinal fasciculus (>2,000 voxels) were observed. Similarly, region-of-interest analysis revealed significant reductions in most white matter regions in patients. In siblings, fractional anisotropy in the posterior thalamic radiation and the forceps was nominally reduced. Significant between-sibling correlations were found for mean fractional anisotropy across the tract-based spatial statistic skeleton, within significant clusters, and within nearly all regions of interest. CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize the relevance of white matter to neuropathology and familiality of bipolar disorder and encourage further use of white matter integrity markers as endophenotypes in genetic studies.
OBJECTIVE: Several lines of evidence indicate that white matter integrity is compromised in bipolar disorder, but the nature, extent, and biological causes remain elusive. To determine the extent to which white matter deficits in bipolar disorder are familial, the authors investigated white matter integrity in a large sample of bipolarpatients, unaffected siblings, and healthy comparison subjects. METHOD: The authors collected diffusion imaging data for 64 adult bipolarpatients, 60 unaffected siblings (including 54 discordant sibling pairs), and 46 demographically matched comparison subjects. Fractional anisotropy was compared between the groups using voxel-wise tract-based spatial statistics and by extracting mean fractional anisotropy from 10 regions of interest. Additionally, intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated between the sibling pairs as an index of familiality. RESULTS: Widespread fractional anisotropy reductions in bipolarpatients (>40,000 voxels) and more subtle reductions in their siblings, mainly restricted to the corpus callosum, posterior thalamic radiations, and left superior longitudinal fasciculus (>2,000 voxels) were observed. Similarly, region-of-interest analysis revealed significant reductions in most white matter regions in patients. In siblings, fractional anisotropy in the posterior thalamic radiation and the forceps was nominally reduced. Significant between-sibling correlations were found for mean fractional anisotropy across the tract-based spatial statistic skeleton, within significant clusters, and within nearly all regions of interest. CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize the relevance of white matter to neuropathology and familiality of bipolar disorder and encourage further use of white matter integrity markers as endophenotypes in genetic studies.
Authors: Heather C Strasser; Jessica Lilyestrom; Ebony R Ashby; Nancy A Honeycutt; David J Schretlen; Ann E Pulver; Ramona O Hopkins; J Raymond Depaulo; James B Potash; Barbara Schweizer; Khara O Yates; Elizabeth Kurian; Patrick E Barta; Godfrey D Pearlson Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Dmitri Tkachev; Michael L Mimmack; Margaret M Ryan; Matt Wayland; Tom Freeman; Peter B Jones; Michael Starkey; Maree J Webster; Robert H Yolken; Sabine Bahn Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-09-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: G D Pearlson; D F Wong; L E Tune; C A Ross; G A Chase; J M Links; R F Dannals; A A Wilson; H T Ravert; H N Wagner Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 1995-06
Authors: Emma Sprooten; Kathryn M Fleming; Pippa A Thomson; Mark E Bastin; Heather C Whalley; Jeremy Hall; Jess E Sussmann; James McKirdy; Douglas Blackwood; Stephen M Lawrie; Andrew M McIntosh Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2012-12-04 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Hidayet E Arat; Virginie-Anne Chouinard; Bruce M Cohen; Kathryn E Lewandowski; Dost Öngür Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Donna J Roybal; Naama Barnea-Goraly; Ryan Kelley; Layla Bararpour; Meghan E Howe; Allan L Reiss; Kiki D Chang Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Kyoko Ohashi; Carl M Anderson; Alaptagin Khan; Michael L Rohan; Elizabeth A Bolger; Cynthia E McGreenery; Martin H Teicher Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 8.294
Authors: Emma Sprooten; Jennifer Barrett; D Reese McKay; Emma E Knowles; Samuel R Mathias; Anderson M Winkler; Margaret S Brumbaugh; Stefanie Landau; Lindsay Cyr; Peter Kochunov; David C Glahn Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: David C Glahn; Emma E M Knowles; D Reese McKay; Emma Sprooten; Henriette Raventós; John Blangero; Irving I Gottesman; Laura Almasy Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Emma Sprooten; Emma E Knowles; D Reese McKay; Harald H Göring; Joanne E Curran; Jack W Kent; Melanie A Carless; Thomas D Dyer; Eugene I Drigalenko; Rene L Olvera; Peter T Fox; Laura Almasy; Ravi Duggirala; Peter Kochunov; John Blangero; David C Glahn Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-04-13 Impact factor: 6.556