L Emsell1, C Chaddock2, N Forde3, W Van Hecke4, G J Barker5, A Leemans6, S Sunaert1, M Walshe2, E Bramon2, D Cannon3, R Murray2, C McDonald3. 1. Translational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven and Radiology,University Hospitals Leuven,Belgium. 2. Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry,King's College London,UK. 3. Clinical Science Institute,National University of Ireland,Galway,Ireland. 4. icoMetrix NV, Leuven,Belgium. 5. Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry,King's College London,UK. 6. Image Sciences Institute,University Medical Centre Utrecht,The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: White matter (WM) abnormalities are proposed as potential endophenotypic markers of bipolar disorder (BD). In a diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) voxel-based analysis (VBA) study of families multiply affected with BD, we previously reported that widespread abnormalities of fractional anisotropy (FA) are associated with both BD and genetic liability for illness. In the present study, we further investigated the endophenotypic potential of WM abnormalities by applying DTI tractography to specifically investigate tracts implicated in the pathophysiology of BD. METHOD: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were acquired from 19 patients with BD type I from multiply affected families, 21 of their unaffected first-degree relatives and 18 healthy volunteers. DTI tractography was used to identify the cingulum, uncinate fasciculus (UF), arcuate portion of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), corpus callosum, and the anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC). Regression analyses were conducted to investigate the effect of participant group and genetic liability on FA and radial diffusivity (RD) in each tract. RESULTS: We detected a significant effect of group on both FA and RD in the cingulum, SLF, callosal splenium and ILF driven by reduced FA and increased RD in patients compared to controls and relatives. Increasing genetic liability was associated with decreased FA and increased RD in the UF, and decreased FA in the SLF, among patients. CONCLUSIONS: WM microstructural abnormalities in limbic, temporal and callosal pathways represent microstructural abnormalities associated with BD whereas alterations in the SLF and UF may represent potential markers of endophenotypic risk.
BACKGROUND: White matter (WM) abnormalities are proposed as potential endophenotypic markers of bipolar disorder (BD). In a diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) voxel-based analysis (VBA) study of families multiply affected with BD, we previously reported that widespread abnormalities of fractional anisotropy (FA) are associated with both BD and genetic liability for illness. In the present study, we further investigated the endophenotypic potential of WM abnormalities by applying DTI tractography to specifically investigate tracts implicated in the pathophysiology of BD. METHOD: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were acquired from 19 patients with BD type I from multiply affected families, 21 of their unaffected first-degree relatives and 18 healthy volunteers. DTI tractography was used to identify the cingulum, uncinate fasciculus (UF), arcuate portion of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), corpus callosum, and the anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC). Regression analyses were conducted to investigate the effect of participant group and genetic liability on FA and radial diffusivity (RD) in each tract. RESULTS: We detected a significant effect of group on both FA and RD in the cingulum, SLF, callosal splenium and ILF driven by reduced FA and increased RD in patients compared to controls and relatives. Increasing genetic liability was associated with decreased FA and increased RD in the UF, and decreased FA in the SLF, among patients. CONCLUSIONS: WM microstructural abnormalities in limbic, temporal and callosal pathways represent microstructural abnormalities associated with BD whereas alterations in the SLF and UF may represent potential markers of endophenotypic risk.
Authors: Hidayet E Arat; Virginie-Anne Chouinard; Bruce M Cohen; Kathryn E Lewandowski; Dost Öngür Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Donna J Roybal; Naama Barnea-Goraly; Ryan Kelley; Layla Bararpour; Meghan E Howe; Allan L Reiss; Kiki D Chang Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Pablo Najt; Fei Wang; Linda Spencer; Jennifer A Y Johnston; Elizabeth T Cox Lippard; Brian P Pittman; Cheryl Lacadie; Lawrence H Staib; Xenophon Papademetris; Hilary P Blumberg Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Benjamin S McKenna; Rebecca J Theilmann; Ashley N Sutherland; Lisa T Eyler Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Sheena I Dev; Tanya T Nguyen; Benjamin S McKenna; Ashley N Sutherland; Hauke Bartsch; Rebecca J Theilmann; Lisa T Eyler Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Emma Sprooten; Jennifer Barrett; D Reese McKay; Emma E Knowles; Samuel R Mathias; Anderson M Winkler; Margaret S Brumbaugh; Stefanie Landau; Lindsay Cyr; Peter Kochunov; David C Glahn Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Sonja M C de Zwarte; Jennifer A Y Johnston; Elizabeth T Cox Lippard; Hilary P Blumberg Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 4.241