Literature DB >> 33533608

From Hydrometeorology to River Water Quality: Can a Deep Learning Model Predict Dissolved Oxygen at the Continental Scale?

Wei Zhi1, Dapeng Feng1, Wen-Ping Tsai1, Gary Sterle2, Adrian Harpold2, Chaopeng Shen1, Li Li1.   

Abstract

Dissolved oxygen (DO) reflects river metabolic pulses and is an essential water quality measure. Our capabilities of forecasting DO however remain elusive. Water quality data, specifically DO data here, often have large gaps and sparse areal and temporal coverage. Earth surface and hydrometeorology data, on the other hand, have become largely available. Here we ask: can a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model learn about river DO dynamics from sparse DO and intensive (daily) hydrometeorology data? We used CAMELS-chem, a new data set with DO concentrations from 236 minimally disturbed watersheds across the U.S. The model generally learns the theory of DO solubility and captures its decreasing trend with increasing water temperature. It exhibits the potential of predicting DO in "chemically ungauged basins", defined as basins without any measurements of DO and broadly water quality in general. The model however misses some DO peaks and troughs when in-stream biogeochemical processes become important. Surprisingly, the model does not perform better where more data are available. Instead, it performs better in basins with low variations of streamflow and DO, high runoff-ratio (>0.45), and winter precipitation peaks. Results here suggest that more data collections at DO peaks and troughs and in sparsely monitored areas are essential to overcome the issue of data scarcity, an outstanding challenge in the water quality community.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LSTM; big data; continental-scale model; deep learning; dissolved oxygen; water quality

Year:  2021        PMID: 33533608     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  3 in total

1.  Prediction of Dichloroethene Concentration in the Groundwater of a Contaminated Site Using XGBoost and LSTM.

Authors:  Feiyang Xia; Dengdeng Jiang; Lingya Kong; Yan Zhou; Jing Wei; Da Ding; Yun Chen; Guoqing Wang; Shaopo Deng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  The Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling System: Overview and Recommendations for Future Development.

Authors:  Raleigh R Hood; Gary W Shenk; Rachel L Dixon; Sean M C Smith; William P Ball; Jesse O Bash; Rich Batiuk; Kathy Boomer; Damian C Brady; Carl Cerco; Peter Claggett; Kim de Mutsert; Zachary M Easton; Andrew J Elmore; Marjorie A M Friedrichs; Lora A Harris; Thomas F Ihde; Iara Lacher; Li Li; Lewis C Linker; Andrew Miller; Julia Moriarty; Gregory B Noe; George Onyullo; Kenneth Rose; Katie Skalak; Richard Tian; Tamie L Veith; Lisa Wainger; Donald Weller; Yinglong Joseph Zhang
Journal:  Ecol Modell       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.512

3.  Machine learning to predict effective reaction rates in 3D porous media from pore structural features.

Authors:  Min Liu; Beomjin Kwon; Peter K Kang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.