Literature DB >> 29864176

Water-Extractable Phosphorus in Animal Manure and Manure Compost: Quantities, Characteristics, and Temporal Changes.

Jian Liu, John T Spargo, Peter J A Kleinman, Robert Meinen, Philip A Moore, Douglas B Beegle.   

Abstract

Water-extractable P (WEP) in manure and manure compost is widely used as an indicator of P release to runoff from manure and compost that are land applied. A survey of 600 manures and composts was conducted to assess trends in WEP (dry weight equivalent) related to manure and compost types from sources in the Mid-Atlantic region. Manure and compost WEP ranged from 0.2 to 20.8 g kg. Mean WEP was highest in turkey and swine manures (manure: 4.1-5.6 g kg; no composts tested), followed by layer and broiler chicken manures (manure: 3.0-3.5 g kg; compost: 4.6-5.1 g kg), cattle manure (dairy and beef manure: 2.1-2.8 g kg; compost: 1.1-2.7 g kg), and horse manure (manure: 2.7 g kg; compost: 1.9 g kg). Across all manures and composts, WEP was negatively correlated with manure dry matter content ( = 0.42, < 0.001). Moreover, WEP was strongly correlated ( = 0.66, < 0.001) to degree of P saturation expressed as a molar ratio of total P to total metals (Ca, Mg, Fe, Al, and Mn). Although WEP levels of beef, broiler chicken, and turkey manures from this survey are similar to those from a decade ago, WEP is now significantly lower for dairy (30%, < 0.001), swine (46%, < 0.001), and layer chickens (39%, < 0.05). Lower WEP resulted from decreasing total P and/or increasing P sorption capacity, combined with increasing dry matter content. Results highlight the potential to use degree of P saturation to predict WEP and suggest an opportunity to reduce WEP by managing manure handling, storage, and chemistry.
Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29864176     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2017.12.0467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  1 in total

1.  The Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling System: Overview and Recommendations for Future Development.

Authors:  Raleigh R Hood; Gary W Shenk; Rachel L Dixon; Sean M C Smith; William P Ball; Jesse O Bash; Rich Batiuk; Kathy Boomer; Damian C Brady; Carl Cerco; Peter Claggett; Kim de Mutsert; Zachary M Easton; Andrew J Elmore; Marjorie A M Friedrichs; Lora A Harris; Thomas F Ihde; Iara Lacher; Li Li; Lewis C Linker; Andrew Miller; Julia Moriarty; Gregory B Noe; George Onyullo; Kenneth Rose; Katie Skalak; Richard Tian; Tamie L Veith; Lisa Wainger; Donald Weller; Yinglong Joseph Zhang
Journal:  Ecol Modell       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.512

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.