Literature DB >> 16919361

Monitoring for conservation.

James D Nichols1, Byron K Williams.   

Abstract

Human-mediated environmental changes have resulted in appropriate concern for the conservation of ecological systems and have led to the development of many ecological monitoring programs worldwide. Many programs that are identified with the purpose of 'surveillance' represent an inefficient use of conservation funds and effort. Here, we revisit the 1964 paper by Platt and argue that his recommendations about the conduct of science are equally relevant to the conduct of ecological monitoring programs. In particular, we argue that monitoring should not be viewed as a stand-alone activity, but instead as a component of a larger process of either conservation-oriented science or management. Corresponding changes in monitoring focus and design would lead to substantial increases in the efficiency and usefulness of monitoring results in conservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16919361     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  86 in total

1.  Principles for the monitoring and evaluation of wetland extent, condition and function in Australia.

Authors:  Neil Saintilan; Sarah Imgraben
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Using variance components to estimate power in a hierarchically nested sampling design.

Authors:  Maria C Dzul; Philip M Dixon; Michael C Quist; Stephen J Dinsmore; Michael R Bower; Kevin P Wilson; D Bailey Gaines
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Monitoring for the Management of Disease Risk in Animal Translocation Programmes.

Authors:  James D Nichols; Tuula E Hollmen; James B Grand
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.184

4.  Phenology research for natural resource management in the United States.

Authors:  Carolyn A F Enquist; Jherime L Kellermann; Katharine L Gerst; Abraham J Miller-Rushing
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 3.787

5.  Accounting for results: how conservation organizations report performance information.

Authors:  Adena R Rissman; Robert Smail
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  A modelling framework for integrating reproduction, survival and count data when projecting the fates of threatened populations.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Parlato; John G Ewen; Mhairi McCready; Kevin A Parker; Doug P Armstrong
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Sex-specific early survival drives adult sex ratio bias in snowy plovers and impacts mating system and population growth.

Authors:  Luke J Eberhart-Phillips; Clemens Küpper; Tom E X Miller; Medardo Cruz-López; Kathryn H Maher; Natalie Dos Remedios; Martin A Stoffel; Joseph I Hoffman; Oliver Krüger; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Searching for sustainability: are assessments of wildlife harvests behind the times?

Authors:  Karen Z Weinbaum; Justin S Brashares; Christopher D Golden; Wayne M Getz
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Identifying thresholds for ecosystem-based management.

Authors:  Jameal F Samhouri; Phillip S Levin; Cameron H Ainsworth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Monitoring great ape and elephant abundance at large spatial scales: measuring effectiveness of a conservation landscape.

Authors:  Emma J Stokes; Samantha Strindberg; Parfait C Bakabana; Paul W Elkan; Fortuné C Iyenguet; Bola Madzoké; Guy Aimé F Malanda; Brice S Mowawa; Calixte Moukoumbou; Franck K Ouakabadio; Hugo J Rainey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.