Literature DB >> 34665345

Marginal fit of 3-unit CAD-CAM zirconia frameworks fabricated using cone beam computed tomography scans: an experimental study.

Hüseyin Berkay Belgin1, Ediz Kale2,3, Tuncer Burak Özçelik4, Burak Yilmaz5,6,7.   

Abstract

Whether cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans can be used for the fabrication of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) is not known. The purpose of the present study was to compare the marginal fit of 3-unit zirconia FDPs fabricated by using CBCT or 3-dimensional (3D) laboratory scanning. Extracted second premolar and molar teeth in a maxillary typodont model were prepared. The first molar was removed and the typodont model was scanned with a laboratory or a CBCT scanner to generate two virtual 3D cast groups (3DL and CBCT). Forty four 3-unit zirconia FDPs were designed on virtual casts and milled. The vertical marginal discrepancy (VMD) was measured by ×100-magnification microscopy at seven locations on each abutment. A total of 616 measurements were made at 14 fixed locations in two groups of 22 specimens. The VMD data for 3DL and CBCT groups were statistically analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test (α = 0.05). The mean VMDs on premolar ranged between 44 and 55 µm (median: 43-55 µm) in 3DL, and 74 and 100 µm (median: 72-93 µm) in CBCT; and on the molar, between 47 and 114 µm (median: 46-114 µm) in 3DL, and 91 and 162 µm (median: 93-156 µm) in CBCT. There was a significant difference between the gaps in 3DL and CBCT groups (p < 0.001). FDPs fabricated using 3D laboratory scanner had significantly smaller VMDs. Nevertheless, the 3-unit zirconia FDPs fabricated using CBCT scans presented promising marginal integrity.
© 2021. The Society of The Nippon Dental University.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD–CAM; CBCT; Marginal fit; Zirconia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34665345     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-021-00668-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  46 in total

Review 1.  Gingival margins for crowns: a review and discussion. Part II: Discrepancies and configurations.

Authors:  A J Hunter; A R Hunter
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 2.  Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mathieu Contrepois; Arnaud Soenen; Michel Bartala; Odile Laviole
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown.

Authors:  S H Hung; K S Hung; J D Eick; R P Chappell
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 4.  Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit.

Authors:  J Y Kan; K Rungcharassaeng; K Bohsali; C J Goodacre; B R Lang
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns.

Authors:  F Sulaiman; J Chai; L M Jameson; W T Wozniak
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

Review 6.  A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations.

Authors:  P Boitelle; B Mawussi; L Tapie; O Fromentin
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.837

7.  The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique.

Authors:  J W McLean; J A von Fraunhofer
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1971-08-03       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns.

Authors:  M Tuntiprawon; P R Wilson
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.291

9.  The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study.

Authors:  S Karlsson
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 10.  Cavity design and mathematics: their effect on gaps at the margins of cast restorations.

Authors:  L E Ostlund
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.