Literature DB >> 8342403

The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study.

S Karlsson1.   

Abstract

In contrast to conventional casting methods for the production of a metallic crown the Procera process is based on precision machine duplication of models combined with spark erosion of the metal frame. Some of the steps in the manual handling procedure are thereby excluded. The present study evaluated, by means of a replica technique, the fit or adaptation of Procera titanium crowns to the stone die and in vivo to the tooth before cementation. For any combination, the marginal adaptation was superior to and significantly better than the occlusal areas and axial surfaces, respectively. In addition, the crowns had a significantly better fit to the stone die than to the tooth. The marginal discrepancy was approximately 60 microns in vitro and 70 microns in vivo, with a range of 3-205 microns.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8342403     DOI: 10.3109/00016359309041158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6357            Impact factor:   2.331


  23 in total

1.  Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques.

Authors:  Júnio S Almeida e Silva; Kurt Erdelt; Daniel Edelhoff; Élito Araújo; Michael Stimmelmayr; Luiz Clovis Cardoso Vieira; Jan-Frederik Güth
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Florian Beuer; Michael Naumann; Wolfgang Gernet; John A Sorensen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Evaluation of the Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Using Two Different Chairside CAD/CAM Systems on Preparations of Varying Quality.

Authors:  Walter Renne; Bethany Wolf; Raymond Kessler; Karen McPherson; Anthony S Mennito
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.843

4.  Marginal and internal fit of posterior three-unit fixed zirconia dental prostheses fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems and materials.

Authors:  Joana Schönberger; Kurt-Jürgen Erdelt; Daniel Bäumer; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Dental Wings CAD/CAM system precision: an internal and marginal fit sperimental analisys.

Authors:  G Sannino; F Gloria; R Schiavetti; L Ottria; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2010-04-20

6.  Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study.

Authors:  Matthias Rödiger; Arthur Heinitz; Ralf Bürgers; Sven Rinke
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Marginal and internal fit of feldspathic ceramic CAD/CAM crowns fabricated via different extraoral digitization methods: a micro-computed tomography analysis.

Authors:  Ece İrem Oğuz; Mehmet Ali Kılıçarslan; Mert Ocak; Burak Bilecenoğlu; Zeynep Ekici
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.634

8.  Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients.

Authors:  Moritz Boeddinghaus; Eva Sabina Breloer; Peter Rehmann; Bernd Wöstmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue.

Authors:  Petra C Guess; Thaleia Vagkopoulou; Yu Zhang; Martin Wolkewitz; Joerg R Strub
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Marginal and Internal Precision of Zirconia Four-Unit Fixed Partial Denture Frameworks Produced Using Four Milling Systems.

Authors:  Karl Martin Lehmann; Michael Weyhrauch; Monika Bjelopavlovic; Herbert Scheller; Henning Staedt; Peter Ottl; Peer W Kaemmerer; Stefan Wentaschek
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.