Literature DB >> 9495168

A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns.

F Sulaiman1, J Chai, L M Jameson, W T Wozniak.   

Abstract

The in vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems (In-Ceram, Procera, and IPS Empress) was compared. All crown systems were significantly different from each other at P = 0.05. In-Ceram exhibited the greatest marginal discrepancy (161 microns), followed by Procera (83 microns), and IPS Empress (63 microns). There were no significant differences among the various stages of the crown fabrication: core fabrication, porcelain veneering, and glazing. The facial and lingual margins exhibited significantly larger marginal discrepancies than the mesial and distal margins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9495168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  47 in total

1.  Aesthetic and functional rehabilitation with pressable ceramics.

Authors:  S H Gupta; Vimal Arora; Bensy Varghese; M M Goswami
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2014-08-14

Review 2.  Recent advances in materials for all-ceramic restorations.

Authors:  Jason A Griggs
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2007-07

3.  Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques.

Authors:  Júnio S Almeida e Silva; Kurt Erdelt; Daniel Edelhoff; Élito Araújo; Michael Stimmelmayr; Luiz Clovis Cardoso Vieira; Jan-Frederik Güth
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Florian Beuer; Michael Naumann; Wolfgang Gernet; John A Sorensen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Can lithium disilicate ceramic crowns be fabricated on the basis of CBCT data?

Authors:  Ana Elisa Colle Kauling; Christine Keul; Kurt Erdelt; Jan Kühnisch; Jan-Frederik Güth
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Marginal and internal fit of posterior three-unit fixed zirconia dental prostheses fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems and materials.

Authors:  Joana Schönberger; Kurt-Jürgen Erdelt; Daniel Bäumer; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  The effect of veneering on the marginal fit of CAD/CAM-generated, copy-milled, and cast metal copings.

Authors:  Sabit Melih Ates; Zeynep Yesil Duymus; Ipek Caglar; Bilal Hologlu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Effect of Resin Bonded Luting Agents Influencing Marginal Discrepancy in All Ceramic Complete Veneer Crowns.

Authors:  Dhanraj Ganapathy; Anusha Sathyamoorthy; Hemalatha Ranganathan; Karthikeyan Murthykumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-12-01

9.  Aesthetic and functionality in fixed prosthodontic: sperimental and clinical analysis of the CAD-CAM systematic 3Shape.

Authors:  G DE Vico; L Ottria; P Bollero; M Bonino; M Cialone; A Barlattani; M Gargari
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2009-04-20

10.  A comparative study of the effect of four consecutive firing cycles on the marginal fit of all: ceramic crown system and metal ceramic crown system.

Authors:  Ganesh B Bajaj
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.