Junghoon Kim1, Choong Guen Chee2, Jungheum Cho1, Youngjune Kim3, Min A Yoon2. 1. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. 3. Air Force Education and Training Command Base Hospita, Jinju, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) for subsolid pulmonary nodules and sources of heterogeneity among reported results. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries (until November 7, 2020) for studies measuring the diagnostic accuracy of PTNB for subsolid pulmonary nodules. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of PTNB were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Bivariate meta-regression analyses were performed to identify sources of heterogeneity. Pooled overall and major complication rates were calculated. RESULTS: We included 744 biopsies from 685 patients (12 studies). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PTNB for subsolid nodules were 90% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85-94%) and 99% (95% CI: 92-100%), respectively. Mean age above 65 years was the only covariate significantly associated with higher sensitivity (93% vs 85%, p = 0.04). Core needle biopsy showed marginally higher sensitivity than fine-needle aspiration (93% vs 83%, p = 0.07). Pooled overall and major complication rate of PTNB were 43% (95% CI: 25-62%) and 0.1% (95% CI: 0-0.4%), respectively. Major complication rate was not different between fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy groups (p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: PTNB had acceptable performance and a low major complication rate in diagnosing subsolid pulmonary nodules. The only significant source of heterogeneity in reported sensitivities was a mean age above 65 years. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is the first meta-analysis attempting to systemically determine the cause of heterogeneity in the diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of PTNB for subsolid pulmonary nodules.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) for subsolid pulmonary nodules and sources of heterogeneity among reported results. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries (until November 7, 2020) for studies measuring the diagnostic accuracy of PTNB for subsolid pulmonary nodules. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of PTNB were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Bivariate meta-regression analyses were performed to identify sources of heterogeneity. Pooled overall and major complication rates were calculated. RESULTS: We included 744 biopsies from 685 patients (12 studies). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PTNB for subsolid nodules were 90% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85-94%) and 99% (95% CI: 92-100%), respectively. Mean age above 65 years was the only covariate significantly associated with higher sensitivity (93% vs 85%, p = 0.04). Core needle biopsy showed marginally higher sensitivity than fine-needle aspiration (93% vs 83%, p = 0.07). Pooled overall and major complication rate of PTNB were 43% (95% CI: 25-62%) and 0.1% (95% CI: 0-0.4%), respectively. Major complication rate was not different between fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy groups (p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: PTNB had acceptable performance and a low major complication rate in diagnosing subsolid pulmonary nodules. The only significant source of heterogeneity in reported sensitivities was a mean age above 65 years. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is the first meta-analysis attempting to systemically determine the cause of heterogeneity in the diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of PTNB for subsolid pulmonary nodules.
Authors: Han Na Lee; Sang Min Lee; Jooae Choe; Sang Min Lee; Eun Jin Chae; Kyung-Hyun Do; Joon Beom Seo Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: David F Yankelevitz; Rowena Yip; James P Smith; Mingzhu Liang; Ying Liu; Dong Ming Xu; Mary M Salvatore; Andrea S Wolf; Raja M Flores; Claudia I Henschke Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jin Hur; Hye-Jeong Lee; Ji Eun Nam; Young Jin Kim; Tae Hoon Kim; Kyu Ok Choe; Byoung Wook Choi Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Jin Woo Choi; Chang Min Park; Jin Mo Goo; Yang-Kyun Park; Wonmo Sung; Hyun-Ju Lee; Sang Min Lee; Ji Young Ko; Mi-Suk Shim Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Penny F Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Marie E Westwood; Susan Mallett; Jonathan J Deeks; Johannes B Reitsma; Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan A C Sterne; Patrick M M Bossuyt Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 25.391