Literature DB >> 15498895

Malignant versus benign nodules at CT screening for lung cancer: comparison of thin-section CT findings.

Feng Li1, Shusuke Sone, Hiroyuki Abe, Heber Macmahon, Kunio Doi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate thin-section computed tomographic (CT) characteristics of malignant nodules on the basis of overall appearance (pure ground-glass opacity [GGO], mixed GGO, or solid opacity) in comparison with the appearance of benign nodules.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and patient consent were obtained. Follow-up diagnostic CT was performed in 747 suspicious pulmonary nodules detected at low-dose CT screening (17 892 examinations). Of 747 nodules, 222 were evaluated at thin-section CT (1-mm collimation), which included 59 cancers and 163 benign nodules (3-20 mm). Thin-section CT findings of malignant versus benign nodules with pure GGO (17 vs 12 lesions), mixed GGO (27 vs 29 lesions), or solid opacity (15 vs 122 lesions) were analyzed. Fisher exact test for independence was used to compare differences in shape, margin, and internal features between benign and malignant nodules. Positive predictive value (PPV) was analyzed when a category was significantly different from the others.
RESULTS: Among nodules with pure GGO, a round shape was found more frequently in malignant lesions (11 of 17, 65%) than in benign lesions (two of 12, 17%; P = .02; PPV, 85%); mixed GGO, a subtype with GGO in the periphery and a high-attenuation zone in the center, was seen much more often in malignant lesions (11 of 27, 41%) than in benign lesions (two of 29, 7%; P = .004; PPV, 85%). Among solid nodules, a polygonal shape or a smooth or somewhat smooth margin was present less frequently in malignant than in benign lesions (polygonal shape: 7% vs 38%, P = .02; smooth or somewhat smooth margin: 0% vs 63%, P < .001), and 98% (46 of 47) of polygonal nodules and 100% (77 of 77) of nodules with a smooth or somewhat smooth margin were benign.
CONCLUSION: Recognition of certain characteristics at thin-section CT can be helpful in differentiating small malignant nodules from benign nodules. (c) RSNA, 2004.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15498895     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2333031018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  63 in total

1.  The impact of radiologists' expertise on screen results decisions in a CT lung cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Marjolein A Heuvelmans; Matthijs Oudkerk; Pim A de Jong; Willem P Mali; Harry J M Groen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Long term follow-up for small pure ground-glass nodules: implications of determining an optimum follow-up period and high-resolution CT findings to predict the growth of nodules.

Authors:  Shotaro Takahashi; Nobuyuki Tanaka; Tomoaki Okimoto; Toshiki Tanaka; Kazuhiro Ueda; Tsuneo Matsumoto; Kazuto Ashizawa; Yoshie Kunihiro; Shoji Kido; Naofumi Matsunaga
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Multidetector CT features of pulmonary focal ground-glass opacity: differences between benign and malignant.

Authors:  L Fan; S-Y Liu; Q-C Li; H Yu; X-S Xiao
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Is screening for lung cancer using low dose spiral CT scanning worthwhile?

Authors:  F V Gleeson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 5.  Management of an incidentally discovered pulmonary nodule.

Authors:  Catherine Beigelman-Aubry; Catherine Hill; Philippe A Grenier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Enhanced CT images by the wavelet transform improving diagnostic accuracy of chest nodules.

Authors:  Xiuhua Guo; Xiangye Liu; Huan Wang; Zhigang Liang; Wei Wu; Qian He; Kuncheng Li; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  Potential clinical impact of advanced imaging and computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiology: importance of radiologist's role and successful observer study.

Authors:  Feng Li
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-05-17

8.  CT features of lung scar cancer.

Authors:  Feng Gao; Xiaojun Ge; Ming Li; Xiangpeng Zheng; Li Xiao; Guozhen Zhang; Yanqing Hua
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Unleashing the power of proteomics to develop blood-based cancer markers.

Authors:  Ayumu Taguchi; Samir M Hanash
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Radiological Image Traits Predictive of Cancer Status in Pulmonary Nodules.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Thomas Atwater; Sanja Antic; Qian Li; Ronald C Walker; Gary T Smith; Pierre P Massion; Matthew B Schabath; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.