Literature DB >> 34659482

Preoperative three-dimensional computer planning for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and bone grafting for severe glenoid deformity.

Robert Z Tashjian1, Lindsay Beck1, Irene Stertz1, Peter N Chalmers1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computer assisted planning without patient specific instrumentation may be utilized to guide reverse total shoulder arthroplasty baseplate placement. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference between planned and achieved inclination and retroversion correction with three-dimensional preoperative computer assisted planning in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty without patient specific instrumentation with bone grafting for severe glenoid erosion.
METHODS: Preoperative three-dimensional computer assisted planning without patient specific instrumentation was performed on 15 patients undergoing primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with glenoid bone grafting for severe glenoid erosion. On preoperative and immediate postoperative computed tomography slices, two-dimensional retroversion and inclination were measured. Preoperative three-dimensional baseline retroversion and inclination and planned postoperative three-dimensional retroversion and inclination were measured. Planned and achieved version and inclination changes were compared.
RESULTS: The planned and achieved retroversion corrections were 18° and 12°, respectively (p < 0.001). The planned and achieved inclination corrections were 11° and 11°, respectively (p = 0.803).
CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional computer assisted planning without patient specific instrumentation in the setting of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid erosion requiring bone grafting can accurately guide baseplate placement. All cases in which failure to correct retroversion or inclination within 10° of planning occurred in patients with severe erosion (B3 or E3 glenoids), therefore patient specific guides may be warranted in these cases to improve accuracy of implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.
© 2020 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone grafting; glenoid bone loss; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; shoulder arthroplasty; three-dimensional computer assisted planning

Year:  2020        PMID: 34659482      PMCID: PMC8512969          DOI: 10.1177/1758573220908903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  18 in total

1.  Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Ryan W Simovitch; Matthias A Zumstein; Eveline Lohri; Naeder Helmy; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Nicolas Morin-Salvo; Marc-Olivier Gauci; Brian L Seeto; Peter N Chalmers; Nicolas Holzer; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Three-dimensional planning and use of patient-specific guides improve glenoid component position: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Gilles Walch; Peter S Vezeridis; Pascal Boileau; Pierric Deransart; Jean Chaoui
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  A modification to the Walch classification of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis using three-dimensional imaging.

Authors:  Michael J Bercik; Kevin Kruse; Matthew Yalizis; Marc-Olivier Gauci; Jean Chaoui; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Structural glenoid grafting during primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using humeral head autograft.

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Erin Granger; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Accuracy of patient-specific guided implantation of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  O Verborgt; A I Hachem; K Eid; K Vuylsteke; M Ferrand; P Hardy
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.256

7.  Three-dimensional preoperative planning software and a novel information transfer technology improve glenoid component positioning.

Authors:  Joseph Iannotti; Justin Baker; Eric Rodriguez; John Brems; Eric Ricchetti; Mena Mesiha; Jason Bryan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Planning software and patient-specific instruments in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  James D Wylie; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

9.  Patient-specific instrument guidance of glenoid component implantation reduces inclination variability in total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Steven Heylen; Annemieke Van Haver; Kristien Vuylsteke; Geert Declercq; Olivier Verborgt
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 10.  Challenges in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Addressing Glenoid Bone Loss.

Authors:  Adam J Seidl; Gerald R Williams; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.