Literature DB >> 25183662

Three-dimensional planning and use of patient-specific guides improve glenoid component position: an in vitro study.

Gilles Walch1, Peter S Vezeridis2, Pascal Boileau3, Pierric Deransart4, Jean Chaoui5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glenoid component positioning is a key factor for success in total shoulder arthroplasty. Three-dimensional (3D) measurements of glenoid retroversion, inclination, and humeral head subluxation are helpful tools for preoperative planning. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and precision of a novel surgical method for placing the glenoid component with use of patient-specific templates created by preoperative surgical planning and 3D modeling.
METHODS: A preoperative computed tomography examination of cadaveric scapulae (N = 18) was performed. The glenoid implants were virtually placed, and patient-specific guides were created to direct the guide pin into the desired orientation and position in the glenoid. The 3D orientation and position of the guide pin were evaluated by performing a postoperative computed tomography scan for each scapula. The differences between the preoperative planning and the achieved result were analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean error in 3D orientation of the guide pin was 2.39°, the mean entry point position error was 1.05 mm, and the mean inclination angle error was 1.42°. The average error in the version angle was 1.64°. There were no technical difficulties or complications related to use of patient-specific guides for guide pin placement. Quantitative analysis of guide pin positioning demonstrated a good correlation between preoperative planning and the achieved position of the guide pin.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the reliability and precision of preoperative planning software and patient-specific guides for glenoid component placement in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D; Total shoulder arthroplasty; computed tomography; glenoid component position; patient-specific guides; preoperative planning

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25183662     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  40 in total

1.  The arthritic glenoid: anatomy and arthroplasty designs.

Authors:  Nikolas K Knowles; Louis M Ferreira; George S Athwal
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

2.  Management of complications after revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hithem Rahmi; Andrew Jawa
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

3.  Description and reproducibility assessment of a new computerised tomography scan index to measure the glenoid orientation in relation to the anterior glenoid surface.

Authors:  Constantina Moraiti; Shahnaz Klouche; Jean David Werthel; Thomas Bauer; Philippe Hardy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  ArthroPlanner: a surgical planning solution for acromioplasty.

Authors:  Caecilia Charbonnier; Sylvain Chagué; Bart Kevelham; Delphine Preissmann; Frank C Kolo; Olivier Rime; Alexandre Lädermann
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Version Correction via Eccentric Reaming Compromises Remaining Bone Quality in B2 Glenoids: A Computational Study.

Authors:  Xiang Chen; Akhil S Reddy; Andreas Kontaxis; Daniel S Choi; Timothy Wright; David M Dines; Russell F Warren; Julien Berhouet; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The influence of osteophyte depiction in CT for patient-specific guided hip resurfacing procedures.

Authors:  M Kunz; S Balaketheeswaran; R E Ellis; J F Rudan
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Multilevel glenoid morphology and retroversion assessment in Walch B2 and B3 types.

Authors:  Mohammad Samim; Mandeep Virk; David Mai; Kamran Munawar; Joseph Zuckerman; Soterios Gyftopoulos
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Planning software and patient-specific instruments in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  James D Wylie; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

9.  Proper benefit of a three dimensional pre-operative planning software for glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adrien Jacquot; Marc-Olivier Gauci; Jean Chaoui; Mohammed Baba; Pierric Deransart; Pascal Boileau; Daniel Mole; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  Glenoid component positioning and guidance techniques in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David M Burns; Tym Frank; Cari M Whyne; Patrick Dg Henry
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.