Literature DB >> 28735842

Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion.

Pascal Boileau1, Nicolas Morin-Salvo2, Marc-Olivier Gauci2, Brian L Seeto2, Peter N Chalmers3, Nicolas Holzer4, Gilles Walch5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glenoid deficiency and erosion (excessive retroversion/inclination) must be corrected in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to avoid prosthetic notching or instability and to maximize function, range of motion, and prosthesis longevity. This study reports the results of RSA with an angled, autologous glenoid graft harvested from the humerus (angled BIO-RSA).
METHODS: A trapezoidal bone graft, harvested from the humeral head and fixed with a long-post baseplate and screws, was used to compensate for residual glenoid bone loss/erosion. For simple to moderate (<25°) glenoid defects, standardized instrumentation combined with some eccentric reaming (<15°) was used to reconstruct the glenoid and obtain neutral implant alignment. For severe (>25°) and complex (multiplanar) glenoid bone defects, patient-specific grafts and guides were used after 3-dimensional planning. Patients were reviewed with minimum 2 years of follow-up. Mean follow-up was 36 months (range, 24-81 months). Preoperative and postoperative measurements of inclination and version were performed in the plane of the scapula on computed tomography images.
RESULTS: The study included 54 patients (41 women, 13 men; mean 73 years old). Fifteen patients had combined vertical and horizontal glenoid bone deficiency. Among E2/E3 glenoids, inclination improved from 37° (range, 14° to 84°) to 10.2° (range -28° to 36°, P < .001). Among B2/C glenoids, retroversion improved from -21° (range, -49° to 0°) to -10.6° (-32° to 4°, P = .06). Complete radiographic incorporation of the graft occurred in 94% (51 of 54). Complications included infection in 1 and clinical aseptic baseplate loosening in 2. Mild notching occurred in 25% (13 of 51) of patients. Constant-Murley and Subjective Shoulder Value assessments increased from 31 to 68 and from 30% to 83%, respectively (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Angled BIO-RSA predictably corrects glenoid deficiency, including severe (>25°) multiplanar deformity. Graft incorporation is predictable. Advantages of using an autograftharvested in situ include bone stock augmentation, lateralization, low donor-site morbidity, low relative cost, and flexibility needed to simultaneously correct posterior and superior glenoid defects.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glenoid bone loss; bony lateralization; bony-increased offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA); glenoid erosion; glenoid inclination; glenoid retroversion; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28735842     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  23 in total

1.  Benefits of a metallic lateralized baseplate prolonged by a long metallic post in reverse shoulder arthroplasty to address glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Philippe Valenti; Johanna Sekri; Jean Kany; Imen Nidtahar; Jean-David Werthel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff defect arthropathy].

Authors:  T Patzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Shoulder prosthesis replacement options : New implants, treatment algorithms and clinical results].

Authors:  D Seybold; T A Schildhauer; J Geßmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Humeral and glenoid bone loss in shoulder arthroplasty : Classification and treatment principles].

Authors:  F Gohlke; B Werner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a descriptive analysis of different implants in current practice.

Authors:  Jean-David Werthel; Gilles Walch; Emilie Vegehan; Pierric Deransart; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Philippe Valenti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Bone grafting in primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the management of glenoid bone loss: A systematic review.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Dimitrios Chytas; Lazaros Kostretzis; Emmanouil Brilakis; Emmanouil Fandridis; Michael Hantes; Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-12-10

Review 7.  Bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of the available evidence.

Authors:  Richard Dimock; Mohamed Fathi Elabd; Mohamed Imam; Mark Middleton; Arnaud Godenèche; A Ali Narvani
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-06-02

8.  The effect of glenoid lateralization and glenosphere size in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on deltoid load: A biomechanical cadaveric study.

Authors:  Nadine Ott; Arad Alikah; Michael Hackl; Dominik Seybold; Lars Peter Müller; Kilian Wegmann
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-27

9.  The effect of metaglene lateralization on joint mobility of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A cadaveric biomechanical study.

Authors:  Nadine Ott; Stephanie Kahmann; Michael Hackl; Stephan Uschok; Lars Peter Müller; Kilian Wegmann
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-12

10.  Three-dimensional kinematics of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison between shoulders with good or poor elevation.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsuki; Shota Hoshika; Yusuke Ueda; Morihito Tokai; Norimasa Takahashi; Hiroyuki Sugaya; Scott A Banks
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.