Literature DB >> 26809956

Planning software and patient-specific instruments in shoulder arthroplasty.

James D Wylie1, Robert Z Tashjian2.   

Abstract

Computer planning software and patient-specific instrumentation have been investigated in multiple subspecialties of orthopedics with mixed results. Shoulder arthroplasty has evolved over the last decade with improvements in implant design and surgical instrumentation. Despite these advances, glenoid positioning in shoulder arthroplasty continues to be a difficult problem. Recent advances in three-dimensional imaging techniques and the use of computer planning software may potentially address some of the common difficulties encountered by surgeons. The addition of patient-specific instrumentation and guides provide an option for patients with significant glenoid deformity that may allow improved accuracy of glenoid component implantation compared to using standard instrumentation. Studies have reported improved positioning of the glenoid component in both anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation and guides. More research is needed to determine whether these improvements lead to better patient-reported outcomes or implant survival. In addition, further studies will be needed to address whether this technology is cost effective for large-scale implementation in the orthopedic community.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer navigation; Glenoid positioning; Patient-specific instrumentation; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Shoulder arthroplasty

Year:  2016        PMID: 26809956      PMCID: PMC4762802          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-016-9312-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  51 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for shoulder osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; John Sperling; Rachelle Buchbinder; Kelly McMaken
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

2.  Eccentric reaming in total shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Robert Gillespie; Robert Lyons; Mark Lazarus
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.390

3.  3D navigated implantation of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty. Feasibility and results in an anatomic study.

Authors:  Timo Stübig; Maximilian Petri; Christian Zeckey; Nael Hawi; Christian Krettek; Musa Citak; Rupert Meller
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.547

4.  Correction of acquired glenoid bone loss in osteoarthritis with a standard versus an augmented glenoid component.

Authors:  Vani Sabesan; Mark Callanan; Vinay Sharma; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Accuracy of the glenohumeral subluxation index in nonpathologic shoulders.

Authors:  Matthijs Jacxsens; Alexander Van Tongel; Laurent B Willemot; Andreas M Mueller; Victor Valderrabano; Lieven De Wilde
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Long-term results of total shoulder arthroplasty following bone-grafting of the glenoid.

Authors:  J M Hill; T R Norris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: a randomized prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Michael D Hendel; Jason A Bryan; Wael K Barsoum; Eric J Rodriguez; John J Brems; Peter J Evans; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in patients with a biconcave glenoid.

Authors:  Naoko Mizuno; Patrick J Denard; Patric Raiss; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Accuracy of patient-specific guided glenoid baseplate positioning for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan C Levy; Nathan G Everding; Mark A Frankle; Louis J Keppler
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Posterior glenoid wear in total shoulder arthroplasty: eccentric anterior reaming is superior to posterior augment.

Authors:  Tim Wang; Geoffrey D Abrams; Anthony W Behn; Derek Lindsey; Nicholas Giori; Emilie V Cheung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  6 in total

1.  Stem size prediction in shoulder arthroplasty with preoperative 3D planning.

Authors:  Thomas Wittmann; Nima Befrui; Tim Rieger; Patric Raiss
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Preoperative three-dimensional computer planning for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and bone grafting for severe glenoid deformity.

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Lindsay Beck; Irene Stertz; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-03-13

3.  Computer-Assisted Surgery in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Early Experience.

Authors:  Andrea Giorgini; Luigi Tarallo; Michele Novi; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Influence of glenoid wear pattern on glenoid component placement accuracy in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kevin A Hao; Christopher D Sutton; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Jonathan O Wright; Aimee M Struk; Edward T Haupt; Thiago Leonor; Joseph J King
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-01-15

5.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Treatment of Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear.

Authors:  Fletcher R Preuss; Hannah K Day; Annalise M Peebles; Mitchell S Mologne; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 6.  Preoperative glenoid considerations for shoulder arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Stephen Gates; Brain Sager; Michael Khazzam
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2020-03-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.