Literature DB >> 34659472

Smartphone "Selfies"-A reliable and accurate tool for measuring elbow range of motion.

Maegan N Shields, Anthony M Vaichinger, Shawn W O'Driscoll1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine if self-taken photographs ("selfies"), performed independently after instruction by video or illustrated handout, would be an accurate and reliable tool for capturing elbow range of motion in patients with elbow contractures.
METHODS: Fifty patients presenting with elbow contractures participated in the study. After completion of the selfie, the senior author clinically measured flexion and extension with a goniometer. The angles from the photographs were measured and analyzed.
RESULTS: The agreement between goniometer and "selfie" measurements correlated closely (R2 = 0.98) and agreement was excellent in both extension and in flexion with intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.95 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.97) in extension with a mean difference of 2° (95% CI -3° to 7°), and 0.93 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) in flexion with a mean difference of 4° (95% CI 0° to 8°). Systematic errors were low in extension, 0° (95% CI, ±11°) and in flexion -3° (95% CI, ±10°). Six patients demonstrated ≥10° difference between clinical and selfie measurements. Ability to take a usable selfie was inversely correlated with age (R2 = 0.97). DISCUSSION: Self-taken flexion-extension photographs are a reliable and accurate tool for measuring elbow range of motion. Errors in the selfie technique are well tolerated and appear to have a negligible effect upon measurements of motion. This important parameter of elbow function can therefore be obtained outside a normal clinic visit, thereby improving frequency of follow-up assessments (and minimizing loss to follow-up) necessary for quality control and research.
© 2019 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  correspondence follow-up; elbow contracture; elbow range of motion; photographic measurements; self-taken photographs

Year:  2019        PMID: 34659472      PMCID: PMC8512996          DOI: 10.1177/1758573219869206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  27 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Statistical methodology for reliability studies.

Authors:  M Haas
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Improving patient care by linking evidence-based medicine and evidence-based management.

Authors:  Stephen M Shortell; Thomas G Rundall; John Hsu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm.

Authors:  A D Armstrong; J C MacDermid; S Chinchalkar; R S Stevens; G J King
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Hospital volume and surgical outcomes after elective hip/knee arthroplasty: a risk-adjusted analysis of a large regional database.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; C Kent Kwoh; Robert M Boudreau; Gwo-Chin Lee; Said A Ibrahim
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-08

7.  Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation.

Authors:  Patrick L Ergina; Jonathan A Cook; Jane M Blazeby; Isabelle Boutron; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Barnaby C Reeves; Christoph M Seiler; Douglas G Altman; Jeffrey K Aronson; Jeffrey S Barkun; W Bruce Campbell; Jonathan A Cook; Liane S Feldman; David R Flum; Paul Glasziou; Guy J Maddern; John C Marshall; Peter McCulloch; Jon Nicholl; Steven M Strasberg; Jonathan L Meakins; Deborah Ashby; Nick Black; John Bunker; Martin Burton; Marion Campbell; Kalipso Chalkidou; Iain Chalmers; Marc de Leval; Jon Deeks; Adrian Grant; Muir Gray; Roger Greenhalgh; Milos Jenicek; Sean Kehoe; Richard Lilford; Peter Littlejohns; Yoon Loke; Rajan Madhock; Kim McPherson; Peter Rothwell; Bill Summerskill; David Taggart; Parris Tekkis; Matthew Thompson; Tom Treasure; Ulrich Trohler; Jan Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Redefining competition in health care.

Authors:  Michael E Porter; Elizabeth Olmsted Teisberg
Journal:  Harv Bus Rev       Date:  2004-06

9.  A Comparison of Elbow Range of Motion Measurements: Smartphone-Based Digital Photography Versus Goniometric Measurements.

Authors:  Megan A Meislin; Eric R Wagner; Alexander Y Shin
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Validity and Reliability of Elbow Range of Motion Measurements Using Digital Photographs, Movies, and a Goniometry Smartphone Application.

Authors:  Renée Keijsers; Elisa L Zwerus; Dagmar R M van Lith; Koen L M Koenraadt; Pjotr Goossens; Bertram The; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Denise Eygendaal
Journal:  J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp)       Date:  2018-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.