Literature DB >> 34659470

The role of acromial morphometry in the development of acromial stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Shawn T Yeazell1, Ajith Malige1, Timothy Visser1, Gregory F Carolan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are expanding, and postoperative acromial stress fractures are a troubling postoperative complication. The purpose of this study was to determine if differences in acromial morphometry were present between cohorts with and without this complication.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 101 reverse total shoulder arthroplasty procedures met criteria for the study. A total of eight acromial measurements on preoperative computed tomography scans were performed in axial, coronal, and sagittal views. Postoperative acromial stress fractures were confirmed by computed tomography scan on six patients and classified by fracture type. Statistical analysis was performed using a Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: The median acromial thickness at the posterior and lateral half was significantly thinner in the fracture cohort compared to the non-fracture cohort. Fracture and non-fracture cohort measurements demonstrated a median lateral thickness of 6.8 and 8.7 mm (p = 0.010), respectively, and median posterior thickness of 7.6 and 9.5 mm (p = 0.008), respectively. There were no demographic differences between cohorts. DISCUSSION: Two acromial measurements (lateral and posterior thickness) were associated with the development of postoperative acromial stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. These findings suggest that a thinner acromion in the lateral and posterior half is a risk factor for an acromial stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
© 2020 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acromial stress fracture; acromial stress reaction; acromial thickness; morphometry; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Year:  2020        PMID: 34659470      PMCID: PMC8512991          DOI: 10.1177/1758573220906764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  20 in total

1.  The relationship between acromion thickness and body habitus: practical implications in subacromial decompression procedures.

Authors:  Stefano Gumina; Paolo Albino; Stefano Carbone; Valerio Arceri; Daniele Passaretti; Vittorio Candela; Annarita Vestri; Franco Postacchini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-04-18

Review 2.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Gerber; Scott D Pennington; Richard W Nyffeler
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation of risk factors and the reliability of a proposed classification.

Authors:  Randall J Otto; Nazeem A Virani; Jonathan C Levy; Phillip T Nigro; Derek J Cuff; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. a minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients surgical technique.

Authors:  Mark Frankle; Jonathan C Levy; Derek Pupello; Steven Siegal; Arif Saleem; Mark Mighell; Matthew Vasey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Grammont reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and nonreconstructible rotator cuff lesions.

Authors:  M Rittmeister; F Kerschbaumer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 6.  Use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty in patients with glenohumeral arthritis and rotator cuff deficiency.

Authors:  J C Levy; N Virani; D Pupello; M Frankle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-02

7.  The acromion: morphologic condition and age-related changes. A study of 420 scapulas.

Authors:  G P Nicholson; D A Goodman; E L Flatow; L U Bigliani
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation.

Authors:  K Hamada; H Fukuda; M Mikasa; Y Kobayashi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Classification of postoperative acromial fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan C Levy; Christopher Anderson; Anil Samson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Implant positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty has an impact on acromial stresses.

Authors:  Murray T Wong; G Daniel G Langohr; George S Athwal; James A Johnson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.