| Literature DB >> 34657195 |
Nourhan Shalaby1,2, Veronica Phyllis Dubois1,2, John Ronald3,4,5.
Abstract
Cell-based cancer immunotherapies are becoming a routine part of the armamentarium against cancer. While remarkable successes have been seen, including durable remissions, not all patients will benefit from these therapies and many can suffer from life-threatening side effects. These differences in efficacy and safety across patients and across tumor types (e.g., blood vs. solid), are thought to be due to differences in how well the immune cells traffic to their target tissue (e.g., tumor, lymph nodes, etc.) whilst avoiding non-target tissues. Across patient variability can also stem from whether the cells interact with (i.e., communicate with) their intended target cells (e.g., cancer cells), as well as if they proliferate and survive long enough to yield potent and long-lasting therapeutic effects. However, many cell-based therapies are monitored by relatively simple blood tests that lack any spatial information and do not reflect how many immune cells have ended up at particular tissues. The ex vivo labeling and imaging of infused therapeutic immune cells can provide a more precise and dynamic understanding of whole-body immune cell biodistribution, expansion, viability, and activation status in individual patients. In recent years numerous cellular imaging technologies have been developed that may provide this much-needed information on immune cell fate. For this review, we summarize various ex vivo labeling and imaging approaches that allow for tracking of cellular immunotherapies for cancer. Our focus is on clinical imaging modalities and summarize the progression from experimental to therapeutic settings. The imaging information provided by these technologies can potentially be used for many purposes including improved real-time understanding of therapeutic efficacy and potential side effects in individual patients after cell infusion; the ability to more readily compare new therapeutic cell designs to current designs for various parameters such as improved trafficking to target tissues and avoidance of non-target tissues; and the long-term ability to identify patient populations that are likely to be positive responders and at low-risk of side effects.Entities:
Keywords: Cell tracking; Imaging probes; Immunotherapies; Molecular imaging; Reporter genes
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34657195 PMCID: PMC9122865 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-03073-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother ISSN: 0340-7004 Impact factor: 6.630
An overview of the radioisotopes used and their characteristics (half-life, emission, abundant energy, and medical use)
| Radioisotope | T1/2 | Emission | Most abundant energy (KeV) | Medical use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [123I]I− | 13.2 h | gamma ray | 159 | Diagnostic imaging (gamma camera) |
| [124I]I− | 4.2 days | positron/gamma ray | 511/602 | Diagnostic Imaging (PET) |
| 131I-I− | 8.0 days | beta ray/gamma ray | 606/364 | Therapy/ Diagnostic imaging (gamma camera) |
| [99mTc] | 6.0 h | gamma ray | 140 | Diagnostic imaging (gamma camera) |
| 18F | 109.8 min | positron | 511 | Diagnostic imaging (PET) |
| 89Zr | 3.3 days | positron | 511 | Diagnostic imaging (PET) |
| 111In | 2.8 days | gamma ray | 171/247 | Diagnostic imaging (gamma camera) |
| 64Cu | 12.7 h | beta ray/ positron/ gamma ray | 579/656/ 511–1346 | Diagnostic imaging (PET) Therapy |
| 11C | 20.3 min | positron/gamma ray | 511/967 | Diagnostic imaging (PET) |
| 186Re | 90.6 h | beta ray/gamma ray | 1,070/59 | Therapy |
| 188Re | 17.0 h | beta ray/gamma ray | 2,120, 155 | Therapy |
| 211At | 7.2 h | alpha ray/X-ray | 7,500/77–92 | Therapy |
Fig. 1Schematic depicting the imaging modalities and labels discussed in this review. Created with BioRender.com
Studies using molecular imaging modalities for tracking therapeutic cells
| Modality | Probe or reporter gene | Labelling probe | Immune cell/target entity | Cancer cell type | Model | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PET | Probe | [64Cu]Cu-PTSM | Leukocytes | C6 Glioma | Rat model | [ |
| PET/SPECT | Probe | [18F]FDG [111In]In-oxine [99mTc]TcHMPAO | T lymphocytes | Ovarian carcinoma cell line IGROV1 | [ | |
| PET | Probe | [89Zr]Zr-aTCRmuF(ab')2 | TRC T cells | Human xenograft myeloid sarcoma (ML2) | (NOD/SCID) mice | [ |
| SPECT | Probe | [111In]In-oxine | NK (autologous primary) | Colon carcinoma | Patients | [ |
| PET | Probe | [18F]FDG | CAR NK-92/HER2 neu NK-92-scFv(FRP5)-zeta/ HER2 neu | Breast cancer | Mice | [ |
| PET | Probe | 11C- methyl iodide | Murine NK and lymphocytes | FSaII fibrosarcoma | C3H mice | [ |
| SPECT | Probe | [99mTc]TcHMPAO [111In]In-oxine | Dendritic cells | 7 melanoma and 1 renal cell carcinoma | Patients | [ |
| PET | Probe | [89Zr]Zr-Oxine | Dendritic cells and CTLs | EL4 mouse lymphoma cells | Melanoma mouse model | [ |
| PET/SPECT | Probe | 111Indium [18F]FDG | CAR T cells/HER2/neu | Breast cancer | Patients | [ |
| SPECT | Probe | [111In]In-oxine | Dendritic cells | Melanoma | Patient | [ |
| PET | Probe | [89Zr]Zr-oxine | CAR T cells/ IL13Rα2 CAR T cells/PSCA | Glioblastoma PC3 prostate | Glioblastoma and Prostate cancer | [ |
| PET | Probe | [89Zr]Zr(oxinate)4 | γδ-T cells | Breast cancer xenografts | NSG mice | [ |
| PET | Probe | [89Zr]Zr-oxine | CAR T cells NK cells | Glioma xenografts | NSG mice | [ |
| PET | Reporter gene HSV-tk | [18F]FHBG | CAR T/ IL13Rα2 | Glioblastoma | patient | [ |
| PET | Reporter gene HSV-sr39 tk | [18F]FHBG | CAR T cells/NY-ESO-1 TCR T cells/NY-ESO-1 | Jurkat cells | NSG-A2.1 | [ |
| PET/SPECT | Reporter gene hNET | [123I]MIBG [124I]MIBG | T-lymphocytes/EBV | Lymphoma | (NOD/SCID) mice | [ |
| SPECT | Reporter gene NIS | [99mTc]TcO4− | CAR T cells | PC3-LN3 (PL) prostate cancer cells | (NOD/SCID) mice | [ |
| PET/SPECT | Reporter gene NIS | [18F]TFB/ [99mTc]TcO4− | Dendritic cell (DC2.4) | Imaged LNs | Mice | [ |
| PET | Reporter gene PSMA | 18F-DCFPyL | CAR T cells/CD19 | Nalm6 acute lymphoblastic leukemia | NSG mice | [ |
| 7T MRI | Probe | USPIO | LNK cells | Hepatoma tumours | Buffalo rats | [ |
| 1.5T MRI | Probe | UPSIO | DCs | None | Rabbits | [ |
| 3T MRI | Probe | USPIO | CTLs | Cervical tumours | C57BL/6 mice | [ |
| 7T MRI | Probe | SPIO | BMDCs | Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma tumours | C57BL/6 mice | [ |
| Clinical 1.5T MRI | Probe | SPIO | CAR-NK-92/HER2 | HER2/neu + sarcoma tumour | BALB/c mice | [ |
| MRI | Probe | SPIO | Patient derived DCs | Melanoma | Patients | [ |
| 19F MRI | Probe | PFC (CS-ATM-DM-green) | NK | Medulloblastoma tumour | NSG Mice | [ |
| 19F MRI | Probe | PFC (CS-ATM-1000) | Autologous DC vaccine | Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Patients | [ |
| 19F MRI | Probe | PFC (CS-ATM-1000) | Human NK cells | Chronic myelogenous leukemia | NSG mice | [ |
| 19F MRI | Probe | PFC (Celsense 1000) | T cells/OVA | Melanoma | C57BL/6 mice | [ |
| 19F MRI (3T) | Probe | PFC (Celsense) | BMDCs | Melanoma | C57BL/6 mice | [ |
| 11.7T 19F MRI | Probe | PFC nanoimulsions | CAR-T cells | Glioblastoma | mice | [ |
| MRI | Probe | NaGdF4‐TAT Nanoprobe | T cells | Glioblastoma | C57BL/6 mice | [ |
| 7T MRI | Probe | Gadolinium nanoparticles | Human PDCs | None | NSG mice | [ |
| 9.4T MRI | Reporter gene Ferritin heavy chain RG | DC2.4 cells | None | C57BL/6 mice | [ | |
| 11.7T CEST MRI | Reporter gene Drosophila melanogaster 2′-deoxynucleoside kinase (Dm-dNK) | Pyrrolo-dC | DCs | None | C57BL6 mice | [ |
| PAI | Probe | Gold nanostars | NK cells | Lung carcinoma tumors | Nude mice | [ |
| PAI and 19F MRI | Probe | PFC and ICG nanoparticles | DCs | None | C57BL/6 mice | [ |
| PAI | Probe | Gold nanoparticles | DC2.4 cells | Breast cancer | C57BL/6 mice | [ |
| PAI | Probe | NIR‐797 label | T cells/OVA | Fibrosarcoma tumour | BALB/c nude mice | [ |