UNLABELLED: Imaging spontaneous cancer cell metastasis or heterogeneous tumor responses to drug treatment in vivo is difficult to achieve. The goal was to develop a new highly sensitive and reliable preclinical longitudinal in vivo imaging model for this purpose, thereby facilitating discovery and validation of anticancer therapies or molecular imaging agents. METHODS: The strategy is based on breast cancer cells stably expressing the human sodium iodide symporter (NIS) fused to a red fluorescent protein, thereby permitting radionuclide and fluorescence imaging. Using whole-body nano-SPECT/CT with (99m)TcO4(-), we followed primary tumor growth and spontaneous metastasis in the presence or absence of etoposide treatment. NIS imaging was used to classify organs as small as individual lymph nodes (LNs) to be positive or negative for metastasis, and results were confirmed by confocal fluorescence microscopy. Etoposide treatment efficacy was proven by ex vivo anticaspase 3 staining and fluorescence microscopy. RESULTS: In this preclinical model, we found that the NIS imaging strategy outperformed state-of-the-art (18)F-FDG imaging in its ability to detect small tumors (18.5-fold-better tumor-to-blood ratio) and metastases (LN, 3.6-fold) because of improved contrast in organs close to metastatic sites (12- and 8.5-fold-lower standardized uptake value in the heart and kidney, respectively). We applied the model to assess the treatment response to the neoadjuvant etoposide and found a consistent and reliable improvement in spontaneous metastasis detection. Importantly, we also found that tumor cells in different microenvironments responded in a heterogeneous manner to etoposide treatment, which could be determined only by the NIS-based strategy and not by (18)F-FDG imaging. CONCLUSION: We developed a new strategy for preclinical longitudinal in vivo cancer cell tracking with greater sensitivity and reliability than (18)F-FDG PET and applied it to track spontaneous and distant metastasis in the presence or absence of genotoxic stress therapy. Importantly, the model provides sufficient sensitivity and dynamic range to permit the reliable assessment of heterogeneous treatment responses in various microenvironments.
UNLABELLED: Imaging spontaneous cancer cell metastasis or heterogeneous tumor responses to drug treatment in vivo is difficult to achieve. The goal was to develop a new highly sensitive and reliable preclinical longitudinal in vivo imaging model for this purpose, thereby facilitating discovery and validation of anticancer therapies or molecular imaging agents. METHODS: The strategy is based on breast cancer cells stably expressing the human sodium iodide symporter (NIS) fused to a red fluorescent protein, thereby permitting radionuclide and fluorescence imaging. Using whole-body nano-SPECT/CT with (99m)TcO4(-), we followed primary tumor growth and spontaneous metastasis in the presence or absence of etoposide treatment. NIS imaging was used to classify organs as small as individual lymph nodes (LNs) to be positive or negative for metastasis, and results were confirmed by confocal fluorescence microscopy. Etoposide treatment efficacy was proven by ex vivo anticaspase 3 staining and fluorescence microscopy. RESULTS: In this preclinical model, we found that the NIS imaging strategy outperformed state-of-the-art (18)F-FDG imaging in its ability to detect small tumors (18.5-fold-better tumor-to-blood ratio) and metastases (LN, 3.6-fold) because of improved contrast in organs close to metastatic sites (12- and 8.5-fold-lower standardized uptake value in the heart and kidney, respectively). We applied the model to assess the treatment response to the neoadjuvant etoposide and found a consistent and reliable improvement in spontaneous metastasis detection. Importantly, we also found that tumor cells in different microenvironments responded in a heterogeneous manner to etoposide treatment, which could be determined only by the NIS-based strategy and not by (18)F-FDG imaging. CONCLUSION: We developed a new strategy for preclinical longitudinal in vivo cancer cell tracking with greater sensitivity and reliability than (18)F-FDG PET and applied it to track spontaneous and distant metastasis in the presence or absence of genotoxic stress therapy. Importantly, the model provides sufficient sensitivity and dynamic range to permit the reliable assessment of heterogeneous treatment responses in various microenvironments.
Entities:
Keywords:
fluorescent protein; human sodium iodide symporter; metastasis; pertechnetate; tumor model
Authors: Frederic Boisson; David Zahra; Arvind Parmar; Marie-Claude Gregoire; Steven R Meikle; Hasar Hamse; Anthonin Reilhac Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Roisin M Dwyer; James Ryan; Ronan J Havelin; John C Morris; Brian W Miller; Zhonglin Liu; Richard Flavin; Cathal O'Flatharta; Mark J Foley; Harrison H Barrett; J Mary Murphy; Frank P Barry; Timothy O'Brien; Michael J Kerin Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Farzan Siddiqui; Kenneth N Barton; Hans J Stricker; Phillip F Steyn; Susan M Larue; Kastytis C Karvelis; Richard B Sparks; Jae Ho Kim; Stephen L Brown; Svend O Freytag Journal: Hum Gene Ther Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 5.695
Authors: H Zhuang; M Pourdehnad; E S Lambright; A J Yamamoto; M Lanuti; P Li; P D Mozley; M D Rossman; S M Albelda; A Alavi Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Derek K Marsee; Daniel H Y Shen; Lawrence R MacDonald; Douangsone D Vadysirisack; Xiaoqin Lin; George Hinkle; Richard T Kloos; Sissy M Jhiang Journal: Cancer Gene Ther Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 5.987
Authors: Kenneth N Barton; Donald Tyson; Hans Stricker; Young S Lew; Gregory Heisey; Sweaty Koul; Alberto de la Zerda; Fang-Fang Yin; Hui Yan; Tavarekere N Nagaraja; Kelly Ann Randall; Guk Kim Jin; Joseph D Fenstermacher; Sissy Jhiang; Jae Ho Kim; Svend O Freytag; Stephen L Brown Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Amanda J Weeks; Maite Jauregui-Osoro; Marcel Cleij; Julia E Blower; James R Ballinger; Philip J Blower Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Nourhan Shalaby; John Kelly; Francisco Martinez; Mathew Fox; Qi Qi; Jonathan Thiessen; Justin Hicks; Timothy J Scholl; John A Ronald Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 3.484
Authors: Alex Khoshnevisan; Krisanat Chuamsaamarkkee; Mehdi Boudjemeline; Alex Jackson; Gareth E Smith; Antony D Gee; Gilbert O Fruhwirth; Philip J Blower Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Brooke M Helfer; Vladimir Ponomarev; P Stephen Patrick; Philip J Blower; Alexandra Feitel; Gilbert O Fruhwirth; Shawna Jackman; Lucilia Pereira Mouriès; Margriet V D Z Park; Mangala Srinivas; Daniel J Stuckey; Mya S Thu; Tineke van den Hoorn; Carla A Herberts; William D Shingleton Journal: Cytotherapy Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 6.196
Authors: Richard Southworth; Rafael Torres Martin de Rosales; Levente K Meszaros; Michelle T Ma; Gregory E D Mullen; Gilbert Fruhwirth; Jennifer D Young; Cinzia Imberti; Julia Bagunya-Torres; Erica Andreozzi; Philip J Blower Journal: Adv Inorg Chem Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 3.282