Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a promising clinical approach for reducing tumor progression and prolonging patient survival. However, improvements in both the safety and the potency of CAR T cell therapy demand quantitative imaging techniques to determine the distribution of cells after adoptive transfer. The purpose of this study was to optimize 89Zr-oxine labeling of CAR T cells and evaluate PET as a platform for imaging adoptively transferred CAR T cells. Methods: CAR T cells were labeled with 0-1.4 MBq of 89Zr-oxine per 106 cells and assessed for radioactivity retention, viability, and functionality. In vivo trafficking of 89Zr-oxine-labeled CAR T cells was evaluated in 2 murine xenograft tumor models: glioblastoma brain tumors with intracranially delivered IL13Rα2-targeted CAR T cells, and subcutaneous prostate tumors with intravenously delivered prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA)-targeted CAR T cells. Results: CAR T cells were efficiently labeled (75%) and retained more than 60% of the 89Zr over 6 d. In vitro cytokine production, migration, and tumor cytotoxicity, as well as in vivo antitumor activity, were not significantly reduced when labeled with 70 kBq/106 cells. IL13Rα2-CAR T cells delivered intraventricularly were detectable by PET for at least 6 d throughout the central nervous system and within intracranial tumors. When intravenously administered, PSCA-CAR T cells also showed tumor tropism, with a 9-fold greater tumor-to-muscle ratio than for CAR-negative T cells. Conclusion: 89Zr-oxine can be used for labeling and imaging CAR T cells while maintaining cell viability and function. On the basis of these studies, we conclude that 89Zr-oxine is a clinically translatable platform for real-time assessment of cell therapies.
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a promising clinical approach for reducing tumor progression and prolonging patient survival. However, improvements in both the safety and the potency of CAR T cell therapy demand quantitative imaging techniques to determine the distribution of cells after adoptive transfer. The purpose of this study was to optimize 89Zr-oxine labeling of CAR T cells and evaluate PET as a platform for imaging adoptively transferred CAR T cells. Methods: CAR T cells were labeled with 0-1.4 MBq of 89Zr-oxine per 106 cells and assessed for radioactivity retention, viability, and functionality. In vivo trafficking of 89Zr-oxine-labeled CAR T cells was evaluated in 2 murine xenograft tumor models: glioblastoma brain tumors with intracranially delivered IL13Rα2-targeted CAR T cells, and subcutaneous prostate tumors with intravenously delivered prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA)-targeted CAR T cells. Results: CAR T cells were efficiently labeled (75%) and retained more than 60% of the 89Zr over 6 d. In vitro cytokine production, migration, and tumorcytotoxicity, as well as in vivo antitumor activity, were not significantly reduced when labeled with 70 kBq/106 cells. IL13Rα2-CAR T cells delivered intraventricularly were detectable by PET for at least 6 d throughout the central nervous system and within intracranial tumors. When intravenously administered, PSCA-CAR T cells also showed tumor tropism, with a 9-fold greater tumor-to-muscle ratio than for CAR-negative T cells. Conclusion:89Zr-oxine can be used for labeling and imaging CAR T cells while maintaining cell viability and function. On the basis of these studies, we conclude that 89Zr-oxine is a clinically translatable platform for real-time assessment of cell therapies.
Authors: Khun Visith Keu; Timothy H Witney; Shahriar Yaghoubi; Jarrett Rosenberg; Anita Kurien; Rachel Magnusson; John Williams; Frezghi Habte; Jamie R Wagner; Stephen Forman; Christine Brown; Martin Allen-Auerbach; Johannes Czernin; Winson Tang; Michael C Jensen; Behnam Badie; Sanjiv S Gambhir Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Noriko Sato; Haitao Wu; Kingsley O Asiedu; Lawrence P Szajek; Gary L Griffiths; Peter L Choyke Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-02-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Christine E Brown; Renate Starr; Catalina Martinez; Brenda Aguilar; Massimo D'Apuzzo; Ivan Todorov; Chu-Chih Shih; Behnam Badie; Michael Hudecek; Stanley R Riddell; Michael C Jensen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Taheri Sathaliyawala; Masaru Kubota; Naomi Yudanin; Damian Turner; Philip Camp; Joseph J C Thome; Kara L Bickham; Harvey Lerner; Michael Goldstein; Megan Sykes; Tomoaki Kato; Donna L Farber Journal: Immunity Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Rohit K Srivastava; Anna Jablonska; Chengyan Chu; Lydia Gregg; Jeff W M Bulte; Raymond C Koehler; Piotr Walczak; Miroslaw Janowski Journal: Stem Cells Dev Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 3.272
Authors: Mark A Sellmyer; Sarah A Richman; Katheryn Lohith; Catherine Hou; Chi-Chang Weng; Robert H Mach; Roddy S O'Connor; Michael C Milone; Michael D Farwell Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2019-10-15 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Naomi S Sta Maria; Leslie A Khawli; Vyshnavi Pachipulusu; Sharon W Lin; Long Zheng; Daniel Cohrs; Xiaodan Liu; Peisheng Hu; Alan L Epstein; Russell E Jacobs Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-23 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Stefan Harmsen; Emin Ilker Medine; Maxim Moroz; Fuad Nurili; Jose Lobo; Yiyu Dong; Mezruh Turkekul; Naga Vara Kishore Pillarsetty; Richard Ting; Vladimir Ponomarev; Oguz Akin; Omer Aras Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2020-12-23 Impact factor: 12.479