Literature DB >> 31554577

Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery: Past, present and future.

Frederic Picard1, Angela Helen Deakin2, Philip E Riches3, Kamal Deep2, Joseph Baines2.   

Abstract

Computer technology is ubiquitous and relied upon in virtually all professional activities including neurosurgery, which is why it is surprising that it is not the case for orthopaedic surgery with fewer than 5% of surgeons using available computer technology in their procedures. In this review, we explore the evolution and background of Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS), delving into the basic principles behind the technology and the changes in the discussion on the subject throughout the years and the impact these discussions had on the field. We found evidence that industry had an important role in driving the discussion at least in knee arthroplasty-a leading field of CAOS-with the ratio between patents and publications increased from approximately 1:10 in 2004 to almost 1:3 in 2014. The adoption of CAOS is largely restrained by economics and ergonomics with sceptics challenging the accuracy and precision of navigation during the early years of CAOS moving to patient functional improvements and long term survivorship. Nevertheless, the future of CAOS remains positive with the prospect of new technologies such as improvements in image-guided surgery, enhanced navigation systems, robotics and artificial intelligence.
Copyright © 2019 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery; Imaging technology; Knee surgery; Navigation; Registration; Review; Robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31554577     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  6 in total

1.  A hybrid feature-based patient-to-image registration method for robot-assisted long bone osteotomy.

Authors:  Chunlei Zhang; Yu Liu; Yunguang Zhang; He Li
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  [Robot-assisted joint arthroplasty-An emerging technology of the present and the future].

Authors:  Jun Fu; Ming Ni; Jiying Chen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-10-15

3.  Revisiting Short-term Outcomes of Conventional and Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Population-based Study.

Authors:  Abdalrahman G Ahmed; Yao Tian; Mohamed Hasan; Alexandra Harris; Hassan M K Ghomrawi
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2022-06-10

4.  Biomechanical effects of fixed-bearing femoral prostheses with different coronal positions in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pengcheng Ma; Aikeremujiang Muheremu; Siping Zhang; Qian Zheng; Wei Wang; Kan Jiang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 5.  The Surgical Treatment of Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Peter Brumat; Ožbej Kunšič; Samo Novak; Urban Slokar; Janez Pšenica; Matevž Topolovec; Rene Mihalič; Rihard Trebše
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 6.  Recent Trends, Technical Concepts and Components of Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Systems: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Jan Kubicek; Filip Tomanec; Martin Cerny; Dominik Vilimek; Martina Kalova; David Oczka
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.