Literature DB >> 23662346

Haptically guided robotic technology in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation.

Danyal H Nawabi1, Michael A Conditt, Amar S Ranawat, Nicholas J Dunbar, Jennifer Jones, Scott Banks, Douglas E Padgett.   

Abstract

The longevity of total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues to improve with advancements in design and bearing materials. However, the incidence of dislocation and impingement-related failures continue to rise, with the inability of the surgeon to achieve optimal component orientation cited as a cause. Computer-assistance has been shown to increase the accuracy of component orientation and robotic-assistance has been developed to translate this advantage into precise surgical execution. We sought to validate a haptically-guided robotic arm system in performing THA with the aim of comparing the accuracy of robotic-assisted acetabular cup placement to manual placement. We implanted 12 acetabular components in 6 cadaveric pelvises comparing robotic-assistance on one side with manual implantation on the other. We measured planned and actual center of rotation (COR), cup position, leg-length equalization and offset for each THA using computed tomography and the robotic platform. The root-mean-square (RMS) error for the robotic-assisted system was within 3 degrees for cup placement and within 1 mm for leg-length equalization and offset when compared to computed tomography. The robotic-assisted system was significantly more accurate than manual implantation in reproducing the COR and cup orientation, as determined by a preoperative plan. The RMS error for manual implantation compared to robotic-assistance was 5 times higher for cup inclination and 3.4 times higher for cup anteversion (p < 0.01). Robotic-assistance is more accurate than manual implantation in achieving optimal cup orientation. It has the ability to eliminate human error from THA and should be considered in light of THA failures due to component malposition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23662346     DOI: 10.1177/0954411912468540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  17 in total

1.  Fluoroscopy assessment during anterior minimally invasive hip replacement is more accurate than with the posterior approach.

Authors:  Weifeng Ji; Nathaniel Stewart
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Plan in 2-D, execute in 3-D: an augmented reality solution for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Javad Fotouhi; Clayton P Alexander; Mathias Unberath; Giacomo Taylor; Sing Chun Lee; Bernhard Fuerst; Alex Johnson; Greg Osgood; Russell H Taylor; Harpal Khanuja; Mehran Armand; Nassir Navab
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-04

Review 3.  Technology in Arthroplasty: Are We Improving Value?

Authors:  Bradford S Waddell; Kaitlin Carroll; Seth Jerabek
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-09

4.  [Robot-assisted joint arthroplasty-An emerging technology of the present and the future].

Authors:  Jun Fu; Ming Ni; Jiying Chen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-10-15

5.  [Short-term effectiveness of Mako robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty via posterolateral approach].

Authors:  Xiaogang Zhang; Bachao Ji; Li Cao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-10-15

6.  A propensity score-matched comparison between Mako robotic arm-assisted system and conventional technique in total hip arthroplasty for patients with osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Kei Sato; Atsuko Sato; Naoki Okuda; Matsubara Masaaki; Hideyuki Koga
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Cup position alone does not predict risk of dislocation after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christina I Esposito; Brian P Gladnick; Yuo-Yu Lee; Stephen Lyman; Timothy M Wright; David J Mayman; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  The Evolution of Computer-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty and Relevant Applications.

Authors:  Jun-Dong Chang; In-Sung Kim; Atul M Bhardwaj; Ramachandra N Badami
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2017-03-06

9.  Computerised tomography-based planning with conventional total hip arthroplasty versus robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Babar Kayani; Sujith Konan; Jenni Tahmassebi; Atif Ayuob; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  The current role of robotics in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Babar Kayani; Sujith Konan; Atif Ayuob; Salamah Ayyad; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2019-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.