Literature DB >> 28755417

What affects the predictability of evolutionary constraints using a G-matrix? The relative effects of modular pleiotropy and mutational correlation.

Jobran Chebib1, Frédéric Guillaume1.   

Abstract

Phenotypic traits do not always respond to selection independently from each other and often show correlated responses to selection. The structure of a genotype-phenotype map (GP map) determines trait covariation, which involves variation in the degree and strength of the pleiotropic effects of the underlying genes. It is still unclear, and debated, how much of that structure can be deduced from variational properties of quantitative traits that are inferred from their genetic (co) variance matrix (G-matrix). Here we aim to clarify how the extent of pleiotropy and the correlation among the pleiotropic effects of mutations differentially affect the structure of a G-matrix and our ability to detect genetic constraints from its eigen decomposition. We show that the eigenvectors of a G-matrix can be predictive of evolutionary constraints when they map to underlying pleiotropic modules with correlated mutational effects. Without mutational correlation, evolutionary constraints caused by the fitness costs associated with increased pleiotropy are harder to infer from evolutionary metrics based on a G-matrix's geometric properties because uncorrelated pleiotropic effects do not affect traits' genetic correlations. Correlational selection induces much weaker modular partitioning of traits' genetic correlations in absence then in presence of underlying modular pleiotropy.
© 2017 The Author(s). Evolution © 2017 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Evolvability; G-matrix; genotype-phenotype map; modularity; mutational correlation; pleiotropy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28755417     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  5 in total

Review 1.  Developmental Bias and Evolution: A Regulatory Network Perspective.

Authors:  Tobias Uller; Armin P Moczek; Richard A Watson; Paul M Brakefield; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Integrating genomics and multivariate evolutionary quantitative genetics: a case study of constraints on sexual selection in Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Adam J Reddiex; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  Pleiotropy or linkage? Their relative contributions to the genetic correlation of quantitative traits and detection by multitrait GWA studies.

Authors:  Jobran Chebib; Frédéric Guillaume
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Modularity of genes involved in local adaptation to climate despite physical linkage.

Authors:  Katie E Lotterhos; Sam Yeaman; Jon Degner; Sally Aitken; Kathryn A Hodgins
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 13.583

5.  Every which way? On predicting tumor evolution using cancer progression models.

Authors:  Ramon Diaz-Uriarte; Claudia Vasallo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.