Literature DB >> 24473328

Advantages and pitfalls in the application of mixed-model association methods.

Jian Yang1, Noah A Zaitlen2, Michael E Goddard3, Peter M Visscher1, Alkes L Price4.   

Abstract

Mixed linear models are emerging as a method of choice for conducting genetic association studies in humans and other organisms. The advantages of the mixed-linear-model association (MLMA) method include the prevention of false positive associations due to population or relatedness structure and an increase in power obtained through the application of a correction that is specific to this structure. An underappreciated point is that MLMA can also increase power in studies without sample structure by implicitly conditioning on associated loci other than the candidate locus. Numerous variations on the standard MLMA approach have recently been published, with a focus on reducing computational cost. These advances provide researchers applying MLMA methods with many options to choose from, but we caution that MLMA methods are still subject to potential pitfalls. Here we describe and quantify the advantages and pitfalls of MLMA methods as a function of study design and provide recommendations for the application of these methods in practical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24473328      PMCID: PMC3989144          DOI: 10.1038/ng.2876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  42 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.

Authors:  C R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness.

Authors:  Jianming Yu; Gael Pressoir; William H Briggs; Irie Vroh Bi; Masanori Yamasaki; John F Doebley; Michael D McMullen; Brandon S Gaut; Dahlia M Nielsen; James B Holland; Stephen Kresovich; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-12-25       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping.

Authors:  Hyun Min Kang; Noah A Zaitlen; Claire M Wade; Andrew Kirby; David Heckerman; Mark J Daly; Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Family-based association tests for genomewide association scans.

Authors:  Wei-Min Chen; Goncalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Hyun Min Kang; Jae Hoon Sul; Susan K Service; Noah A Zaitlen; Sit-Yee Kong; Nelson B Freimer; Chiara Sabatti; Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  FaST-LMM-Select for addressing confounding from spatial structure and rare variants.

Authors:  Jennifer Listgarten; Christoph Lippert; David Heckerman
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  The inheritance of liability to diseases with variable age of onset, with particular reference to diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D S Falconer
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 1.670

10.  An Arabidopsis example of association mapping in structured samples.

Authors:  Keyan Zhao; María José Aranzana; Sung Kim; Clare Lister; Chikako Shindo; Chunlao Tang; Christopher Toomajian; Honggang Zheng; Caroline Dean; Paul Marjoram; Magnus Nordborg
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  333 in total

1.  Reply to Lee: Downward bias in heritability estimation is not due to simplified linkage equilibrium SNP simulation.

Authors:  David Golan; Saharon Rosset; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Quality control, imputation and analysis of genome-wide genotyping data from the Illumina HumanCoreExome microarray.

Authors:  Jonathan R I Coleman; Jack Euesden; Hamel Patel; Amos A Folarin; Stephen Newhouse; Gerome Breen
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Integration of genome-wide association and extant brain expression QTL identifies candidate genes influencing prepulse inhibition in inbred F1 mice.

Authors:  L J Sittig; P Carbonetto; K A Engel; K S Krauss; A A Palmer
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.449

4.  Genetic Diversity and Association Studies in US Hispanic/Latino Populations: Applications in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.

Authors:  Matthew P Conomos; Cecelia A Laurie; Adrienne M Stilp; Stephanie M Gogarten; Caitlin P McHugh; Sarah C Nelson; Tamar Sofer; Lindsay Fernández-Rhodes; Anne E Justice; Mariaelisa Graff; Kristin L Young; Amanda A Seyerle; Christy L Avery; Kent D Taylor; Jerome I Rotter; Gregory A Talavera; Martha L Daviglus; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Neil Schneiderman; Gerardo Heiss; Robert C Kaplan; Nora Franceschini; Alex P Reiner; John R Shaffer; R Graham Barr; Kathleen F Kerr; Sharon R Browning; Brian L Browning; Bruce S Weir; M Larissa Avilés-Santa; George J Papanicolaou; Thomas Lumley; Adam A Szpiro; Kari E North; Ken Rice; Timothy A Thornton; Cathy C Laurie
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Model-free Estimation of Recent Genetic Relatedness.

Authors:  Matthew P Conomos; Alexander P Reiner; Bruce S Weir; Timothy A Thornton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Genome-wide Associations Reveal Human-Mouse Genetic Convergence and Modifiers of Myogenesis, CPNE1 and STC2.

Authors:  Ana I Hernandez Cordero; Natalia M Gonzales; Clarissa C Parker; Greta Sokolof; David J Vandenbergh; Riyan Cheng; Mark Abney; Andrew Sko; Alex Douglas; Abraham A Palmer; Jennifer S Gregory; Arimantas Lionikas
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Predictors of smoking reduction outcomes in a sample of 287 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Bo-Jian Wu; Tsuo-Hung Lan
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.270

8.  Genome-wide meta-analyses of stratified depression in Generation Scotland and UK Biobank.

Authors:  Lynsey S Hall; Mark J Adams; Aleix Arnau-Soler; Toni-Kim Clarke; David M Howard; Yanni Zeng; Gail Davies; Saskia P Hagenaars; Ana Maria Fernandez-Pujals; Jude Gibson; Eleanor M Wigmore; Thibaud S Boutin; Caroline Hayward; Generation Scotland; David J Porteous; Ian J Deary; Pippa A Thomson; Chris S Haley; Andrew M McIntosh
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 9.  Recent advances in the study of fine-scale population structure in humans.

Authors:  John Novembre; Benjamin M Peter
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 5.578

10.  Profiling and Leveraging Relatedness in a Precision Medicine Cohort of 92,455 Exomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey Staples; Evan K Maxwell; Nehal Gosalia; Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui; Christopher Snyder; Alicia Hawes; John Penn; Ricardo Ulloa; Xiaodong Bai; Alexander E Lopez; Cristopher V Van Hout; Colm O'Dushlaine; Tanya M Teslovich; Shane E McCarthy; Suganthi Balasubramanian; H Lester Kirchner; Joseph B Leader; Michael F Murray; David H Ledbetter; Alan R Shuldiner; George D Yancoupolos; Frederick E Dewey; David J Carey; John D Overton; Aris Baras; Lukas Habegger; Jeffrey G Reid
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.