Literature DB >> 34625824

Optimal insertion site of glenoid baseplate in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: anatomical simulation using three dimensional image processing software.

Hyeon Jang Jeong1, Myeong Gon Jeong1, Sang Woo Kim1, Jian Han1, Bei Liu1, Sung-Min Rhee2, Joo Han Oh3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Conventionally, the central structure of the baseplate is inserted through the point where the vertical and horizontal axes of the glenoid intersect (conventional insertion site (CIS)). However, there is scanty theoretical evidence that CIS has the optimal bone stock. We evaluated the optimal insertion site for the glenoid baseplate through the three-dimensional volumetric measurement of the glenoid bone stock.
METHODS: Pre-operative computed tomography (CT) images of 30 consecutive reverse total shoulder arthroplasty procedures were analyzed. Three-dimensional image processing software was used to reconstruct CT and volumetrically measure the glenoid bone stock according to the simulated central peg. A simulated central peg was inserted to the medial pole of the scapula from 49 points determined along with the intersect point of the vertical and horizontal axes of the glenoid CIS at 2-mm intervals. The overlapped volume between the simulated central peg and glenoid vault, representing the amount of glenoid bone stock along the passage of the central peg, was then automatically calculated.
RESULTS: The depth of the glenoid vault was 25.5 ± 3.0 mm (range, 19.3-31.5), and the mean overlapped volume between the simulated central peg and the glenoid vault was 623.0 ± 185.8 ml. The optimal insertion site for the bony purchase of the central peg was 2 mm inferior and posterior from the CIS (765.3 ± 157.5).
CONCLUSION: The optimal insertion site of the baseplate is located slightly inferiorly and posteriorly to the CIS. This anatomical information may be used as a reference to determine the optimal insertion site of the baseplate according to an implant of a surgeon's choice.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glenoid baseplate; Optimal insertion site for glenoid baseplate; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; Three-dimensional volumetric measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34625824     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05235-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  18 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of component position and hardware failure in the reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Sergio Gutiérrez; R Michael Greiwe; Mark A Frankle; Steven Siegal; William E Lee
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Normal glenoid vault anatomy and validation of a novel glenoid implant shape.

Authors:  Michael J Codsi; Craig Bennetts; Katherine Gordiev; Daniel M Boeck; Young Kwon; John Brems; Kimerly Powell; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Projection of the glenoid center point within the glenoid vault.

Authors:  Damian M Rispoli; John W Sperling; George S Athwal; Doris E Wenger; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Long-term results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff dysfunction: a systematic review of longitudinal outcomes.

Authors:  Lukas Ernstbrunner; Octavian Andronic; Florian Grubhofer; Roland S Camenzind; Karl Wieser; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Associations between in-vivo glenohumeral joint motion and morphology.

Authors:  Cathryn D Peltz; George Divine; Anne Drake; Nicole L Ramo; Roger Zauel; Vasilios Moutzouros; Michael J Bey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Complications and revision of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  P Boileau
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.256

7.  Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time?

Authors:  Luc Favard; Christophe Levigne; Cécile Nerot; Christian Gerber; Lieven De Wilde; Daniel Mole
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G Walch; R Badet; A Boulahia; A Khoury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Accuracy of CT-based measurements of glenoid version for total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Heinz R Hoenecke; Juan C Hermida; Cesar Flores-Hernandez; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Optimizing glenoid component position using three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction.

Authors:  Heinz R Hoenecke; Juan C Hermida; Nicholas Dembitsky; Shantanu Patil; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.