Literature DB >> 21384212

Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time?

Luc Favard1, Christophe Levigne, Cécile Nerot, Christian Gerber, Lieven De Wilde, Daniel Mole.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty has considerably increased since first introduced in 1985. Despite demonstrating early improvement of function and pain, there is limited information regarding the durability and longer-term outcomes of this prosthesis. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined complication rates, functional scores over time, survivorship, and whether radiographs would develop signs of loosening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 527 reverse shoulder arthroplasties performed in 506 patients between 1985 and 2003. Clinical and radiographic assessment was performed in 464 patients with a minimum followup of 2 years and 148 patients with a minimum followup of 5 years (mean, 7.5 years; range, 5-17 years). Cumulative survival curves were established with end points being prosthesis revision and Constant-Murley score of less than 30 points.
RESULTS: Eighty-nine of 489 had at least one complication for a total of 107 complications. Survivorship free of revision was 89% at 10 years with a marked break occurring at 2 and 9 years. Survivorship to a Constant-Murley score of less than 30 was 72% at 10 years with a marked break observed at 8 years. We observed progressive radiographic changes after 5 years and an increasing frequency of large notches with long-term followup.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the need for revision of reverse shoulder arthroplasty was relatively low at 10 years, Constant-Murley score and radiographic changes deteriorated with time. These findings are concerning regarding the longevity of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and therefore caution must be exercised when recommending reverse shoulder arthroplasty, especially in younger patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21384212      PMCID: PMC3148361          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1833-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  28 in total

1.  Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Duncan Watkinson; Armodios M Hatzidakis; Istvan Hovorka
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years.

Authors:  Jacques Guery; Luc Favard; François Sirveaux; Didier Oudet; Daniel Mole; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Ryan W Simovitch; Matthias A Zumstein; Eveline Lohri; Naeder Helmy; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients.

Authors:  Mark Frankle; Steven Siegal; Derek Pupello; Arif Saleem; Mark Mighell; Matthew Vasey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of defect arthropathy.

Authors:  Ludwig Seebauer; Willibald Walter; Werner Keyl
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 6.  Use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty in patients with glenohumeral arthritis and rotator cuff deficiency.

Authors:  J C Levy; N Virani; D Pupello; M Frankle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-02

7.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up.

Authors:  T Bufquin; A Hersan; L Hubert; P Massin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-04

Review 8.  [Revision of failed fracture hemiarthroplasties to reverse total shoulder prosthesis through the transhumeral approach : method incorporating a pectoralis-major-pedicled bone window].

Authors:  Frank Gohlke; Olaf Rolf
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christophe Lévigne; Pascal Boileau; Luc Favard; Pascal Garaud; Daniel Molé; François Sirveaux; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology.

Authors:  Bryan Wall; Laurent Nové-Josserand; Daniel P O'Connor; T Bradley Edwards; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  79 in total

Review 1.  [Fractures of the humerus head].

Authors:  M Jaeger; K Izadpanah; D Maier; K Reising; P C Strohm; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  CORR Insights(®): implant design variations in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty influence the required deltoid force and resultant joint load.

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Short to mid-term results of stemless reverse shoulder arthroplasty in a selected patient population compared to a matched control group with stem.

Authors:  Philipp Moroder; Lukas Ernstbrunner; Christine Zweiger; Maximilian Schatz; Gerd Seitlinger; Robert Skursky; Johannes Becker; Herbert Resch; Rolf Michael Krifter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Long-term impact of scapular notching after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Spiry; J Berhouet; C Agout; G Bacle; Luc Favard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Evaluation of lengthening in reverse shoulder arthroplasty comparing X-rays and computerised tomography.

Authors:  Birgit S Werner; Matthew Daggett; Yannick Carrillon; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [The reverse shoulder arthroplasty Delta Xtend : Mid-term results].

Authors:  S Gruber; C Schoch; M Geyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  [Shoulder endoprosthesis in the elderly : Hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty? Anatomic or reverse?]

Authors:  J Kircher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Petrillo; U G Longo; R Papalia; V Denaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

9.  Glenoid bone loss in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Amar Malhas; Abbas Rashid; Dave Copas; Steve Bale; Ian Trail
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-05-06

10.  Survey study suggests that reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is becoming the treatment of choice for four-part fractures of the humeral head in the elderly.

Authors:  David D Savin; Ina Zamfirova; Joseph Iannotti; Benjamin A Goldberg; Ari R Youderian
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.