Literature DB >> 34621652

The occurrence of dental implant malpositioning and related factors: A cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography survey.

Yaser Safi1, Reza Amid2, Fariba Zadbin3, Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie1, Hamed Mortazavi4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dental implants are widely used for the rehabilitation of edentulous sites. This study investigated the occurrence of dental implant malpositioning as shown on post-implantation cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to identify related factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples with at least 1 malpositioned dental implant were collected from a central radiology clinic in Tehran, Iran from January 2017 to January 2019. Variables such as demographic characteristics, length and diameter of implants, type of implant, sites of implant insertion, different types of implant malpositioning problems (cortical plate perforation, interference with anatomical structures), angulation of the implant, and the severity of malpositioning were assessed. In addition, the incidence of implant fracture and over-drilling was evaluated. Data were statistically analyzed using the chi-square test, 1-sample t-test, and Spearman correlation coefficients.
RESULTS: In total, 252 patients referred for implant postoperative CBCT evaluations were assessed. The cases of implant malpositioning included perforation of the buccal cortical plate (19.4%), perforation of the lingual cortical plate (14.3%), implant proximity to an adjacent implant (19.0%), implant proximity to an adjacent tooth (3.2%), interference with anatomical structures (maxillary sinus: 18.3%, mandibular canal: 11.1%, nasal cavity: 6.3%, mental foramen: 5.6%, and incisive canal: 0.4%). Implant fracture and over-drilling were found in 1.6% and 0.8% of cases, respectively. Severity was categorized as mild (9.5%), moderate (35.7%), severe (37.7%), and extreme (17.1%), and 52.4% of implants had inappropriate angulation.
CONCLUSION: CBCT imaging is recommended for detecting dental implant malpositioning. The most common and severe type of malpositioning was buccal cortex perforation.
Copyright © 2021 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomic Landmarks; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Dental Implants; Medical Errors

Year:  2021        PMID: 34621652      PMCID: PMC8479431          DOI: 10.5624/isd.20200331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent        ISSN: 2233-7822


  39 in total

1.  Morphology and dimensions of the mandibular jaw bone in the interforaminal region in patients requiring implants in the distal areas.

Authors:  Marc Quirynen; Nuri Mraiwa; Daniel van Steenberghe; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants.

Authors:  Dominic O'Sullivan; Lars Sennerby; Neil Meredith
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Early implant failure. Prognostic capacity of Periotest: retrospective study of a large sample.

Authors:  Blas Noguerol; Ricardo Muñoz; Francisco Mesa; Juan de Dios Luna; Francisco O'Valle
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Implant displacement into the mandible: an unusual complication during implant surgery.

Authors:  Re-Mee Doh; Nan-Sim Pang; Kee-Deog Kim; Wonse Park
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.454

5.  Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.

Authors:  M B Hürzeler; A Kirsch; K L Ackermann; C R Quiñones
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  A New Classification of Anterior Mandible Edentulous Ridge Based on Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Yaser Safi; Reza Amid; Zahra Vasegh; Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2021

7.  Anatomical variations in the interforaminal regions of candidates for implant-assisted overdentures: a cross-sectional CBCT analysis.

Authors:  Yaser Safi; Reza Amid; Zahra Vasegh; Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec

8.  Lingual vascular canals of the mandible: the risk of bleeding complications during implant procedures.

Authors:  Salvatore Longoni; Matteo Sartori; Marc Braun; Pierre Bravetti; Antonio Lapi; Marco Baldoni; Giovanni Tredici
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.454

9.  Avoiding injury to the inferior alveolar nerve by routine use of intraoperative radiographs during implant placement.

Authors:  Jeffrey Burstein; Chris Mastin; Bach Le
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: a retrospective investigation.

Authors:  Terrence J Griffin; Wai S Cheung
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.426

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.