Literature DB >> 15295322

The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: a retrospective investigation.

Terrence J Griffin1, Wai S Cheung.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Reduced bone height frequently presents a challenge for implant-assisted tooth replacement in partially edentulous patients.
PURPOSE: This retrospective study evaluated the success rate of short, wide hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants placed in mandibular and maxillary molar areas with reduced bone height.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 168 HA-coated implants (6-mm diameter x 8-mm length) were placed in 167 patients in a private-practice setting. A minimal 6-mm workable ridge height and 8-mm ridge width was available in all situations. Patients were referred back to 1 of 7 referring restorative dentists for restoration of the implants. No attempt was made to standardize the restoration of the implants except to avoid working and nonworking contacts in lateral excursions. Implant success was evaluated according to the following criteria: (1) absence of complaints, (2) absence of recurring peri-implant infection or suppuration, (3) absence of perceptible implant mobility, and (4) absence of radiolucencies at implant-bone junction. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Fifty-four (32.1%), 35 (20.8%), 36 (21.4%), and 42 (25.0%) implants replaced maxillary first and second and mandibular first and second molars, respectively. There were 128 implant-supported single crowns. Thirty-eight implants served as abutments for fixed partial dentures connected to other implants of various sizes. Two implants were involved in cantilevered fixed partial dentures. Patients were followed for up to 68 months (mean=34.9 months) after loading of implants. The overall cumulative success rate was found to be 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: For residual ridges with minimal height but adequate width, the use of short, wide HA-coated implants may offer a simple and predictable treatment alternative in posterior areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15295322     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  21 in total

1.  The effects of location of alveolar crest on the vertical bone heights on panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  S-M Lee; S-S Lee; K-H Huh; W-J Yi; M-S Heo; S-C Choi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  A systematic review on the long-term success of calcium phosphate plasma-spray-coated dental implants.

Authors:  B A J A van Oirschot; E M Bronkhorst; J J J P van den Beucken; G J Meijer; J A Jansen; R Junker
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Anatomical considerations for implant placements in first maxillary molar extracted sites in East Asian patients.

Authors:  G K Ananda; Phrabhakaran Nambiar; Sunil Mutalik; Palasuntharam Shanmuhasuntharam
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Posterior partially edentulous jaws, planning a rehabilitation with dental implants.

Authors:  Douglas R Monteiro; Emily V F Silva; Eduardo P Pellizzer; Osvaldo Magro Filho; Marcelo C Goiato
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 5.  Short Implants: New Horizon in Implant Dentistry.

Authors:  Neha Jain; Manisha Gulati; Meenu Garg; Chetan Pathak
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

6.  The occurrence of dental implant malpositioning and related factors: A cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography survey.

Authors:  Yaser Safi; Reza Amid; Fariba Zadbin; Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie; Hamed Mortazavi
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-05-06

7.  TREATMENT OUTCOME OF SHORT DENTAL IMPLANTS.

Authors:  Y O Ajayi; N Nwachukwu; B O Akinboboye
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

8.  Marginal bone response of implants with platform switching and non-platform switching abutments in posterior healed sites: a 1-year prospective study.

Authors:  Yun-Chi Wang; Joseph Y K Kan; Kitichai Rungcharassaeng; Phillip Roe; Jaime L Lozada
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Short Dental Implants (≤8.5 mm) versus Standard Dental Implants (≥10 mm): A One-Year Post-Loading Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Guillermo Pardo-Zamora; Antonio José Ortiz-Ruíz; Fabio Camacho-Alonso; José Francisco Martínez-Marco; Juan Manuel Molina-González; Núria Piqué-Clusella; Ascensión Vicente-Hernández
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Biomechanics and load resistance of short dental implants: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Istabrak Hasan; Christoph Bourauel; Torsten Mundt; Friedhelm Heinemann
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2013-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.