Literature DB >> 34618139

Genome- and transcriptome-wide off-target analyses of an improved cytosine base editor.

Linnell Bentley Randall1, Simon Sretenovic2, Yuechao Wu3,4, Desuo Yin2, Tao Zhang3,4, Joyce Van Eck1,5, Yiping Qi2,6.   

Abstract

Cytosine base editors (CBEs) are the promising tools for precise genome editing in plants. It is important to investigate potential off-target effects of an efficient CBE at the genome and transcriptome levels in a major crop. Based on comparison of five cytidine deaminases and two different promoters for expressing single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs), we tested a highly efficient A3A/Y130F-BE3 system for efficient C-to-T base editing in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). We then conducted whole-genome sequencing of four base-edited tomato plants, three Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing control plants, and two wild-type plants. The sequencing depths ranged from 25× to 49× with read mapping rates >97%. No sgRNA-dependent off-target mutations were detected. Our data show an average of approximately 1,000 single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) and approximately 100 insertions and deletions (indels) per GFP control plant. Base-edited plants had on average elevated levels of SNVs (approximately 1,250) and indels (approximately 300) per plant. On average, about 200 more C-to-T (G-to-A) mutations were found in a base-edited plant than a GFP control plant, suggesting some level of sgRNA-independent off-target effects, though the difference is not statistically significant. We also conducted RNA sequencing of the same four base-edited plants and three GFP control plants. An average of approximately 200 RNA SNVs was discovered per plant for either base-edited or GFP control plants. Furthermore, no specific enrichment of C-to-U mutations can be found in the base-edited plants. Hence, we cannot find any evidence for bona fide off-target mutations by A3A/Y130F-BE3 at the transcriptome level. © American Society of Plant Biologists 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34618139      PMCID: PMC8418419          DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.005


  69 in total

1.  Efficient C-to-T base editing in plants using a fusion of nCas9 and human APOBEC3A.

Authors:  Yuan Zong; Qianna Song; Chao Li; Shuai Jin; Dingbo Zhang; Yanpeng Wang; Jin-Long Qiu; Caixia Gao
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Efficient base editing in methylated regions with a human APOBEC3A-Cas9 fusion.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Jianan Li; Ying Wang; Bei Yang; Jia Wei; Jing Wu; Ruixuan Wang; Xingxu Huang; Jia Chen; Li Yang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Cas12a Base Editors Induce Efficient and Specific Editing with Low DNA Damage Response.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Chengfeng Ding; Wenxia Yu; Ying Wang; Siting He; Bei Yang; Yi-Chun Xiong; Jia Wei; Jifang Li; Jiayi Liang; Zongyang Lu; Wei Zhu; Jing Wu; Zhi Zhou; Xingxu Huang; Zhen Liu; Li Yang; Jia Chen
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos.

Authors:  Erwei Zuo; Yidi Sun; Wu Wei; Tanglong Yuan; Wenqin Ying; Hao Sun; Liyun Yuan; Lars M Steinmetz; Yixue Li; Hui Yang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C:G-to-T:A base editors with higher efficiency and product purity.

Authors:  Alexis C Komor; Kevin T Zhao; Michael S Packer; Nicole M Gaudelli; Amanda L Waterbury; Luke W Koblan; Y Bill Kim; Ahmed H Badran; David R Liu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  A method for the production and expedient screening of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated non-transgenic mutant plants.

Authors:  Longzheng Chen; Wei Li; Lorenzo Katin-Grazzini; Jing Ding; Xianbin Gu; Yanjun Li; Tingting Gu; Ren Wang; Xinchun Lin; Ziniu Deng; Richard J McAvoy; Frederick G Gmitter; Zhanao Deng; Yunde Zhao; Yi Li
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 6.793

7.  Expanding C-T base editing toolkit with diversified cytidine deaminases.

Authors:  Tian-Lin Cheng; Shuo Li; Bo Yuan; Xiaolin Wang; Wenhao Zhou; Zilong Qiu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Base editing with high efficiency in allotetraploid oilseed rape by A3A-PBE system.

Authors:  Hongtao Cheng; Mengyu Hao; Bingli Ding; Desheng Mei; Wenxiang Wang; Hui Wang; Rijin Zhou; Jia Liu; Chao Li; Qiong Hu
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 9.803

9.  Expanding plant genome-editing scope by an engineered iSpyMacCas9 system that targets A-rich PAM sequences.

Authors:  Simon Sretenovic; Desuo Yin; Adam Levav; Jeremy D Selengut; Stephen M Mount; Yiping Qi
Journal:  Plant Commun       Date:  2020-07-22

10.  Evaluation and minimization of Cas9-independent off-target DNA editing by cytosine base editors.

Authors:  Jordan L Doman; Aditya Raguram; Gregory A Newby; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  6 in total

1.  Updates on gene editing and its applications.

Authors:  Holger Puchta; Jiming Jiang; Kan Wang; Yunde Zhao
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Improvement of base editors and prime editors advances precision genome engineering in plants.

Authors:  Kai Hua; Peijin Han; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Highly efficient CRISPR systems for loss-of-function and gain-of-function research in pear calli.

Authors:  Meiling Ming; Hongjun Long; Zhicheng Ye; Changtian Pan; Jiali Chen; Rong Tian; Congrui Sun; Yongsong Xue; Yingxiao Zhang; Jiaming Li; Yiping Qi; Jun Wu
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 7.291

4.  CRISPR-BETS: a base-editing design tool for generating stop codons.

Authors:  Yuechao Wu; Yao He; Simon Sretenovic; Shishi Liu; Yanhao Cheng; Yangshuo Han; Guanqing Liu; Yu Bao; Qing Fang; Xuelian Zheng; Jianping Zhou; Yiping Qi; Yong Zhang; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 9.803

5.  Base Editors for Citrus Gene Editing.

Authors:  Xiaoen Huang; Yuanchun Wang; Nian Wang
Journal:  Front Genome Ed       Date:  2022-02-28

6.  Genome-wide analyses of PAM-relaxed Cas9 genome editors reveal substantial off-target effects by ABE8e in rice.

Authors:  Yuechao Wu; Qiurong Ren; Zhaohui Zhong; Guanqing Liu; Yangshuo Han; Yu Bao; Li Liu; Shuyue Xiang; Shuo Liu; Xu Tang; Jianping Zhou; Xuelian Zheng; Simon Sretenovic; Tao Zhang; Yiping Qi; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 13.263

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.