Literature DB >> 34615666

Anterior segment biometric measurements explain misclassifications by a deep learning classifier for detecting gonioscopic angle closure.

Alice Shen1, Michael Chiang1, Anmol A Pardeshi1, Roberta McKean-Cowdin2, Rohit Varma3, Benjamin Y Xu4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To identify biometric parameters that explain misclassifications by a deep learning classifier for detecting gonioscopic angle closure in anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) images.
METHODS: Chinese American Eye Study (CHES) participants underwent gonioscopy and AS-OCT of each angle quadrant. A subset of CHES AS-OCT images were analysed using a deep learning classifier to detect positive angle closure based on manual gonioscopy by a reference human examiner. Parameter measurements were compared between four prediction classes: true positives (TPs), true negatives (TNs), false positives (FPs) and false negatives (FN). Logistic regression models were developed to differentiate between true and false predictions. Performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and classifier accuracy metrics.
RESULTS: 584 images from 127 participants were analysed, yielding 271 TPs, 224 TNs, 77 FPs and 12 FNs. Parameter measurements differed (p<0.001) between prediction classes among anterior segment parameters, including iris curvature (IC) and lens vault (LV), and angle parameters, including angle opening distance (AOD). FP resembled TP more than FN and TN in terms of anterior segment parameters (steeper IC and higher LV), but resembled TN more than TP and FN in terms of angle parameters (wider AOD). Models for detecting FP (AUC=0.752) and FN (AUC=0.838) improved classifier accuracy from 84.8% to 89.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: Misclassifications by an OCT-based deep learning classifier for detecting gonioscopic angle closure are explained by disagreement between anterior segment and angle parameters. This finding could be used to improve classifier performance and highlights differences between gonioscopic and AS-OCT definitions of angle closure. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angle; diagnostic tests/investigation; glaucoma; imaging

Year:  2021        PMID: 34615666      PMCID: PMC8983788          DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  26 in total

1.  Anterior Segment Imaging Predicts Incident Gonioscopic Angle Closure.

Authors:  Mani Baskaran; Jayant V Iyer; Arun K Narayanaswamy; Yingke He; Lisandro M Sakata; Renyi Wu; Dianna Liu; Monisha E Nongpiur; David S Friedman; Tin Aung
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Anterior chamber angle measurement with optical coherence tomography: intraobserver and interobserver variability.

Authors:  Maya Müller; Gerlinde Dahmen; Erk Pörksen; Gerd Geerling; Horst Laqua; Andreas Ziegler; Hans Hoerauf
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Repeatability and reproducibility of anterior chamber angle measurement with anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Haitao Li; Christopher Kai Shun Leung; Carol Yim Lui Cheung; Lee Wong; Chi Pui Pang; Robert Neal Weinreb; Dennis Shun Chiu Lam
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Long-term Changes in Anterior Segment Characteristics of Eyes With Different Primary Angle-Closure Mechanisms.

Authors:  Junki Kwon; Kyung Rim Sung; Seungbong Han
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Repeatability and comparison of clinical techniques for anterior chamber angle assessment.

Authors:  Peter Campbell; Tony Redmond; Rishi Agarwal; Lewis R Marshall; Bruce J W Evans
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Deep Learning Classifiers for Automated Detection of Gonioscopic Angle Closure Based on Anterior Segment OCT Images.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Xu; Michael Chiang; Shreyasi Chaudhary; Shraddha Kulkarni; Anmol A Pardeshi; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs.

Authors:  Varun Gulshan; Lily Peng; Marc Coram; Martin C Stumpe; Derek Wu; Arunachalam Narayanaswamy; Subhashini Venugopalan; Kasumi Widner; Tom Madams; Jorge Cuadros; Ramasamy Kim; Rajiv Raman; Philip C Nelson; Jessica L Mega; Dale R Webster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for Diabetic Retinopathy and Related Eye Diseases Using Retinal Images From Multiethnic Populations With Diabetes.

Authors:  Daniel Shu Wei Ting; Carol Yim-Lui Cheung; Gilbert Lim; Gavin Siew Wei Tan; Nguyen D Quang; Alfred Gan; Haslina Hamzah; Renata Garcia-Franco; Ian Yew San Yeo; Shu Yen Lee; Edmund Yick Mun Wong; Charumathi Sabanayagam; Mani Baskaran; Farah Ibrahim; Ngiap Chuan Tan; Eric A Finkelstein; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Ian Y Wong; Neil M Bressler; Sobha Sivaprasad; Rohit Varma; Jost B Jonas; Ming Guang He; Ching-Yu Cheng; Gemmy Chui Ming Cheung; Tin Aung; Wynne Hsu; Mong Li Lee; Tien Yin Wong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Laser peripheral iridotomy for the prevention of angle closure: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mingguang He; Yuzhen Jiang; Shengsong Huang; Dolly S Chang; Beatriz Munoz; Tin Aung; Paul J Foster; David S Friedman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Agreement between Gonioscopic Examination and Swept Source Fourier Domain Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging.

Authors:  Mohammed Rigi; Nicholas P Bell; David A Lee; Laura A Baker; Alice Z Chuang; Donna Nguyen; Vandana R Minnal; Robert M Feldman; Lauren S Blieden
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-20       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.