Literature DB >> 34611779

Targeting repeatability of a less obtrusive surgical navigation procedure for total shoulder arthroplasty.

Oded Aminov1, William Regan2, Joshua W Giles3, Maciej J K Simon2,4, Antony J Hodgson5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Surgical navigation systems have demonstrated improvements in alignment accuracy in a number of arthroplasty procedures, but they have not yet been widely adopted for use in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We believe this is due in part to the obtrusiveness of conventional optical tracking systems, as well as the need for additional intraoperative steps such as calibration and registration. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of adapting a less-intrusive dental navigation system for use in TSA.
METHODS: We developed a proof-of-concept system based on validated laser-engraved surgical tools recently introduced for use in dental surgery that are calibrated once when manufactured and not recalibrated at time of use. The design also features a notably smaller bone-mounted tracker that can be tracked from a wide range of viewing angles. To assess our system's performance, we modified the dental surgical software to support guidance of a TSA procedure. We then conducted a user study in which three participants with varying surgical experience used the system to drill 30 holes in a glenoid model. Using a coordinate measuring machine, we determined the resulting drilled trajectory and compared this to the pre-planned trajectory. Since we used a model glenoid rather than anatomical specimens, we report on targeting precision rather than overall procedure precision or accuracy.
RESULTS: We found targeting precision < 1 mm (standard deviation) for locating the entry hole and <  ~ 1° (SD) for both version and inclination. The latter value was markedly lower than the end-to-end angular precision achieved by previously reported TSA navigation systems (approximately 3°-5° SD).
CONCLUSION: We conclude that variability during the targeting phase represents a small fraction of the overall variability exhibited by existing systems, so a less obtrusive navigation system for TSA based on laser-engraved tooling is likely feasible, which could improve the uptake rates of surgical navigation for TSA, thereby potentially leading to improved overall surgical outcomes.
© 2021. CARS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery; Orthopaedics; Patient-specific instrumentation; Surgical navigation; Total shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34611779     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-021-02503-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  15 in total

1.  Uncemented glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship and outcomes.

Authors:  Scott David Martin; David Zurakowski; Thomas S Thornhill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Trends in the epidemiology of total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States from 1990-2000.

Authors:  Nitin B Jain; Laurence D Higgins; Ulrich Guller; Ricardo Pietrobon; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-08-15

3.  Patient-specific glenoid guides provide accuracy and reproducibility in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  M O Gauci; P Boileau; M Baba; J Chaoui; G Walch
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Glenoid revision surgery after total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  S A Antuna; J W Sperling; R H Cofield; C M Rowland
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Nationwide shoulder arthroplasty rates and revision burden in Germany: analysis of the national hospitalization data 2005 to 2006.

Authors:  Matthias F Hollatz; Andreas Stang
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Good long-term results following cementless TKA with a titanium plasma coating.

Authors:  Theodore Bouras; Vasileios Bitas; Peter Fennema; Panagiotis Korovessis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Influence of joint kinematics on polyethylene wear in anatomic shoulder joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Steffen Braun; Stefan Schroeder; Ulrike Mueller; Robert Sonntag; Matthias Buelhoff; Jan Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 8.  Glenoid component positioning and guidance techniques in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David M Burns; Tym Frank; Cari M Whyne; Patrick Dg Henry
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-10-26

9.  Implant survival of the most common cemented total hip devices from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database.

Authors:  Mika Junnila; Inari Laaksonen; Antti Eskelinen; Pekka Pulkkinen; Leif Ivar Havelin; Ove Furnes; Anne Marie Fenstad; Alma B Pedersen; Søren Overgaard; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick; Henrik Malchau; Keijo T Mäkelä
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty is Associated with Increased Thirty-Day Postoperative Complications and Wound Infections Relative to Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Venkat Boddapati; Michael C Fu; William W Schairer; Lawrence V Gulotta; David M Dines; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-09-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Glenoid Component Placement Assisted by Augmented Reality Through a Head-Mounted Display During Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Tomás Rojas; Alexandre Lädermann; Sean Wei Loong Ho; Mustafa S Rashid; Matthias A Zumstein
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-04-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.