BACKGROUND: With an increasing volume of primary total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA), the number of revision TSA cases is expected to increase as well. However, the postoperative medical morbidity of revision TSA has not been clearly described. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of postoperative complications following revision TSA, relative to primary TSA. In addition, we sought to identify independent predictors of complications, as well as to compare operative time and postoperative length of stay between primary and revision TSA. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary/revision TSA between 2005 and 2015 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Differences in complications, readmission rates, operative time, length of stay, and predictors of complications were evaluated using bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 10,371 primary TSA (95.4%) and 496 revision TSA cases (4.6%) were identified. The overall complication rate was 6.5% in primary and 10.7% in revision TSA patients (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified an increased risk of any complication (odds ratio 1.73, p < 0.001), major complication (2.08, p = 0.001), and wound infection (3.45, p = 0.001) in revision TSA patients, relative to primary cases. Operative time was increased in revision cases (mean ± standard deviation, 125 ± 62.5), relative to primary (115 ± 47.7, p < 0.001). Age > 75, female sex, history of diabetes or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥ 3 were associated with increased risk of any complication. Smoking history was the only significant predictor of wound infection. CONCLUSION: Revision TSA, in comparison to primary, poses an increased risk of postoperative complications, particularly wound infections. A history of smoking was an independent predictor of wound infections.
BACKGROUND: With an increasing volume of primary total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA), the number of revision TSA cases is expected to increase as well. However, the postoperative medical morbidity of revision TSA has not been clearly described. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of postoperative complications following revision TSA, relative to primary TSA. In addition, we sought to identify independent predictors of complications, as well as to compare operative time and postoperative length of stay between primary and revision TSA. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary/revision TSA between 2005 and 2015 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Differences in complications, readmission rates, operative time, length of stay, and predictors of complications were evaluated using bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 10,371 primary TSA (95.4%) and 496 revision TSA cases (4.6%) were identified. The overall complication rate was 6.5% in primary and 10.7% in revision TSA patients (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified an increased risk of any complication (odds ratio 1.73, p < 0.001), major complication (2.08, p = 0.001), and wound infection (3.45, p = 0.001) in revision TSA patients, relative to primary cases. Operative time was increased in revision cases (mean ± standard deviation, 125 ± 62.5), relative to primary (115 ± 47.7, p < 0.001). Age > 75, female sex, history of diabetes or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥ 3 were associated with increased risk of any complication. Smoking history was the only significant predictor of wound infection. CONCLUSION: Revision TSA, in comparison to primary, poses an increased risk of postoperative complications, particularly wound infections. A history of smoking was an independent predictor of wound infections.
Entities:
Keywords:
ACS NSQIP; arthroplasty outcomes; complications; primary total shoulder arthroplasty; revision total shoulder arthroplasty; surgical site infection
Authors: Jacob J Triplet; Nathan G Everding; Jonathan C Levy; Nathan T Formaini; Kevin P O'Donnell; Molly A Moor; Leonardo D Virraroel Journal: Orthopedics Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 1.390
Authors: Emmanouil Liodakis; Stephane G Bergeron; David J Zukor; Olga L Huk; Laura M Epure; John Antoniou Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Pascal Boileau; Barbara Melis; David Duperron; Grégory Moineau; Adam P Rumian; Yung Han Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Grant H Garcia; Michael C Fu; Matthew L Webb; David M Dines; Edward V Craig; Lawrence V Gulotta Journal: Orthopedics Date: 2016-05-25 Impact factor: 1.390
Authors: Peter Lc Lapner; Meaghan D Rollins; Meltem G Tuna; Caleb Netting; Anan Bader Eddeen; Carl van Walraven Journal: J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast Date: 2019-10-21
Authors: Ajay S Padaki; Venkat Boddapati; Justin Mathew; Christopher S Ahmad; Charles M Jobin; William N Levine Journal: JSES Open Access Date: 2019-09-16