Literature DB >> 34603792

Enzyme-polymeric/inorganic metal oxide/hybrid nanoparticle bio-conjugates in the development of therapeutic and biosensing platforms.

Suliman Khan1, Mohammad Mahdi Nejadi Babadaei2, Anwarul Hasan3,4, Zehra Edis5,6, Farnoosh Attar7, Rabeea Siddique1, Qian Bai8, Majid Sharifi9,10,11, Mojtaba Falahati10.   

Abstract

Background: Because enzymes can control several metabolic pathways and regulate the production of free radicals, their simultaneous use with nanoplatforms showing protective and combinational properties is of great interest in the development of therapeutic nano-based platforms. However, enzyme immobilization on nanomaterials is not straightforward due to the toxic and unpredictable properties of nanoparticles in medical practice. Aim of review: In fact, because of the ability to load enzymes on nano-based supports and increase their renewability, scientific groups have been tempted to create potential therapeutic enzymes in this field. Therefore, this study not only pays attention to the therapeutic and diagnostic applications of diseases by enzyme-nanoparticle (NP) bio-conjugate (abbreviated as: ENB), but also considers the importance of nanoplatforms used based on their toxicity, ease of application and lack of significant adverse effects on loaded enzymes. In the following, based on the published reports, we explained that the immobilization of enzymes on polymers, inorganic metal oxide and hybrid compounds provide hopes for potential use of ENBs in medical activities. Then, the use of ENBs in bioassay activities such as paper-based or wearing biosensors and lab-on-chip/microfluidic biosensors were evaluated. Finally, this review addresses the current challenges and future perspective of ENBs in biomedical applications. Key scientific concepts of review: This literature may provide useful information regarding the application of ENBs in biosensing and therapeutic platforms.
© 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cairo University.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biosensing; Conjugate; Drug delivery; Enzyme Immobilization; Nanomaterial; Therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34603792      PMCID: PMC8463903          DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2021.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Res        ISSN: 2090-1224            Impact factor:   10.479


Introduction

Enzymes, based on catalytic activities, are considered as a key part of the development of health systems [1]. Indeed, the ability of the enzyme to perform catalytic reactions has made these compounds inevitably the most important cause of biological reactions over the past decades [1]. However, due to the lack of long- and medium-term stability in various environmental and biological conditions, the complexity of enzyme production processes, the presence of impurities, and the limited activity range (low rate of recovery and reproducibility) led the researchers to focus on producing alternative materials showing catalytic activity. Enzyme stabilization by covalent/non-covalent attachment on modified matrices using different chemical activation strategies [2] is surprisingly valuable because we will be able to reuse the enzymes after applying them during a particular process, and thus we can see a longer half-life and less degradability during the specific reactions [3], [4], [5]. Not only their diffusing and kinetic parameters are changed [6], [7], [8], but the rate, at which the reactions take place, as well as the onset of a series of reactions and their activation/inhibition, can be controlled, both in terms of time and type of complete reaction [9], [10], [11], [12]. Enzyme immobilization also prevents contamination of protein/enzyme substrates and other compounds [13], [14], which also reduces the cost of purification [15], [16]. Immobilization of the enzyme increases the stability and half-life of the enzyme [17], [18], [19], but at the same time allows the enzymes to operate on a larger scale and larger ecosystem ranges and possibly interact with other enzymes [20], [21], [22]. The stabilization of enzymes requires the formation of an environment in which the enzymatic activity in terms of temperature and the corresponding pH is similar to the initial environment of its function in the biological system [23], [24]. Recent advances in industrial and medical biotechnology have made the use of stabilized enzymes in a variety of biomedical and manufacturing applications [25], [26]. This increase in commercial applications of enzymes that are consistent with their stabilization has a wide variety of research areas in the field of enzyme loading on different solid supports [27]. Recently, special researches have been conducted on the development of more feasible and applicable methods for enzyme stabilization, which has led to the formation of more potential methods for the production or decomposition of a number of compounds by biocatalytic reactions [28], [29]. There are also several reports on the potential application of immobilized enzymes for target delivery [30], [31], anti-tumoral effect [32], [33] and biosensors [34], [35], [36]. Indeed, the development of enzyme immobilization in biotechnological [11], [37] and clinical platforms [38] has received a great deal of attention in many applications in the field of drug delivery [39] to various biological systems and anticancer activities [40], [41]. They are also used as sensors [42] to control some diseases like diabetes [43] and cancer [44]. Indeed, enzyme immobilization is widely used in the design and development of degradable biosensors [45]. With the development of nanotechnology, researchers are increasingly paying attention to the technology of enzyme–nanoparticle (NP) bio-conjugate (abbreviated as: ENB), and also development of nanozymes [46]. Although ENB is a potential strategy for application of enzymes in biomedical platforms [47], the complex processes of development, cost, and loss of enzymatic activity due to lack of proper interaction upon immobilization on nanomaterial-based matrixes have led to a limited development of this method compared to nanozymes [4], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54]. Of course, ENB has some potential advantages such as increased stability of different enzymes under harsh environmental and biological conditions, targeted enzyme transfer to tissues [55], [56], reduced inflammation induced by antioxidant activities of NPs [57], and induction of growth in tissues due to optimal effects of NPs [58], [59]. Given the importance of using enzymes with high stability and catalytic activity, this review article focuses on the development and application of ENB for therapeutic, drug delivery and biosensing approaches.

Different methods of ENB preparation

Despite the expanded immobilization of enzymes on nanomaterials in the industry, their use in biomedical applications encounters some limitations due to the toxic nature of some NPs. Nevertheless, the use of ENB for drug delivery and therapeutic applications is under development. In this regard, in addition to the toxicity of NPs, which can be moderated according to the type of coatings and materials used, enzyme activity with high efficiency is another major challenge. Advantages and disadvantages of the different methods of enzyme loading on the nano-based platforms are summarized in Table 1. It was revealed that the adsorption method can show the highest efficiency and the covalent or cross-linking methods provide the highest stability on the enzyme structure [23], [60]. Therefore, the type of target and materials used in the matrix are effective on the final efficiency of ENB development.
Table 1

Advantages and disadvantages of different enzyme immobilization techniques.

Immobilization methodsAdvantagesDisadvantages
AdsorptionSimple production, no need for functionalization of support, inexpensive, lack of conformational changes of the enzyme, high catalytic activity, Minor changes of the active site of the enzyme.The formation of weak bonds with solid support, low stability and high leakage.
Entrapment/ EncapsulationHigh stability, minimal conformational changes of the enzyme, continuous reaction, easy downstream process, co-immobilization of different enzymes.Low apparent activity of the enzyme, limitation of mass transfer, low loading percent, complicated experimental process.
Covalent attachmentLack of enzyme leaching, strong interaction with the solid support, high stability, high operational consistency.Mobility limitation of enzymes, low enzyme activity, structural restriction, most complicated and expensive, use of toxic chemicals.
Cross-linkingStrong bonding, lack of enzyme leakage, reusable, low release rate,Decrease in enzymatic activity, decrease in diffusion rate, transfer limitations
Advantages and disadvantages of different enzyme immobilization techniques.

Material used in matrix

Despite the wide range of NPs, the applications of many of these supports are limited in biomedical activities for enzyme loading due to their toxicity and type of application. For example, despite providing sufficient space for enzymes loading on porous silica (SiO2) NPs [61] and carbon nanostructures [62], [63], they are not being widely used in biomedical applications because of the cytotoxicity stimulated via apoptosis. Hence, providing sufficient space for loading and improving the stability of enzymes is not the main criteria for application of NPs in therapeutic activities. The most important NPs used to transfer enzymes to target tissues, including synthetic and natural polymers, inorganic metal oxides and hybrid compounds.

Polymers

Each member of the polymers includes natural (collagen, fibrin, cellulose, chitin, chitosan, alginate, and creatine), synthesized [poly(ethylene glycol)(PEG), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), poly(lactic acid) (PLA), poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP), poly(acrylic acid) (PAA)and poly(caprolactone acid) (PCL)], and their combination have unique chemical and physical properties in biomedical activities that make them as potential and versatile agents in different biomedical applications such as drug delivery, tissue engineering, imaging, and diagnostic activities [24], [64]. These compounds show outstanding features such as biocompatibility, cost-effectiveness, biodegradability, safety, porosity, high surface area for enzymes loading, and finally reusability in multiple cycles [65], [66]. For instance, in a mice model, Salvalaio et al. [67] for the treatment of lysosomal storage disorders, one of the metabolic syndromes in the brain, using PLGA-NPs modified with albumin and loading lysosomal enzyme not only were able to pass the enzyme through the blood–brain barrier and improve disease by providing enzyme in the tissue, but also revealed that PLGA with significant biocompatibility and biodegradability in the target tissue had no side effect on cell viability. However, there are some disadvantages such as unwanted impurities in natural polymers that increase the immunogenicity at the time of decomposition, the highly variable mechanical structures due to the type of bonds and compounds in the polymers, and the production of acidic compounds during degradation [24], [68].

Inorganic metal oxidase

Metal and metal oxide NPs comprise a wide range of nanomaterials. These compounds are highly regarded because of their unique chemical or physical properties such as high stability, high availability, simple modifiability, optimal to excellent biocompatibility, crossing physiological barriers, imaging capability, and auxiliary activities such as photothermal therapy (PTT), antioxidant activities, tunable size and level [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74]. Moreover, high enzyme loading [75], unusual redox properties [76] and regulation of enzymatic activities through conformational induction [77], [78], [79] can be other prominent features of these NPs. However, these nanomaterials show some disadvantages that depend on their physical and chemical nature and methods selected for NPs production. For example, the toxicity of inorganic metal oxide NPs increases as the surface-to-volume ratio of NPs enhances, whereas the toxicity reduces as their dimensions decrease below 10–15 nm due to the detoxification of NPs [80]. While, Gao et al. [81] and Chen et al. [82] reported that iron oxide NPs (IONPs) and copper oxide (CuO) NPs inherently have peroxidase- and oxidase-like activities respectively, which by decreasing the size of NPs from 300 to 30 nm and 30 to 6 nm, their enzymatic-like activity increases. Therefore, the toxicity of the nanomaterials is consistent with their catalytic activities. Also, active sites on metal or metal oxide NPs that have inducible effects on cell death cause high toxicity through DNA degradation, destruction of mitochondrial electron transfer activities, reactive oxygen induction, denaturation of vital intracellular proteins, and increased expression of inflammatory proteins [83], [84]. In addition, the cost of manufacturing methods and high toxicity of NPs-forming materials are other challenges of this group [85]. Nevertheless, the toxicity reported in metal and metal oxide NPs are confusing and generally challenging due to the variety of cells used in the articles as well as the diverse conditions of the examined NPs. However, the most toxic inorganic metal oxide NPs appear to be CuO and zinc oxide (ZnO) and the most compatible NPs seem to be IONPs and titanium oxide (TiO2) [84], [86]. Among the metal NPs, gold (Au) and Fe exhibited the minimum toxicity [84], [87], [88].

Hybrid compounds

Sometimes the combination of polymer compounds with inorganic metal oxide is used to increase the efficiency of nanoplatforms. Each of the polymers and metal or metal oxide NPs show some merits and drawbacks that their optimization can reduce their side effects. Moreover, platforms produced can display properties that cannot be observed in individual materials. Synthesized hybrids are divided into three parts based on the type of ingredients: organic-organic hybrids, organic-metal oxide hybrids and metal oxide-metal oxide hybrids (Table 2). Combining an inorganic metal oxide with potential mechanical stability and the ability to perform auxiliary therapeutic activities with a biocompatible polymer produces a suitable ENB for enzymatic activities in medical application. In addition, by using different hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds, a nanoplatform can be prepared which, in addition to increasing solubility and reducing immunogenicity in the physiological condition, increases the chemical bonds between the enzyme and the nano-based support and high enzyme efficiency under physiological states [89]. Also, Liu et al. [90] showed that the use of different polymers in the synthesis of nanoplatforms provides the possibility of creating higher porosity along with increasing the ability of chemical bonding. For example, Li et al. [91] by comparing the ENB and free enzyme with the platform derived from propyl-methyl ammonium chloride as a polymer and IONPs as a matrix, not only improved the lipase loading, but also increased the enzyme activity 1.5 fold and its recovery by 147.7%. Similarly, it was shown that the integration of poly-vinyl alcohol with IONPs increased the catalytic efficiency of the lipase and its stability compared to the individual state of the NPs and the free enzyme [92]. In addition to polymers, protein compounds such as amyloid fibrils can be used to produce hybrid NPs to further transfer NPs into the target cell or tissue [93].
Table 2

Summary of hybrid nanoplatforms applied for enzymes immobilization.

NanoplatformsImmobilization typeBinding groupImmobilize enzymeRef.
Graphene oxide-Fe3O4Covalent binding–OH, C = OGlucoamylase[151]
Cellulose-Polyacrylic acidCovalent binding–OH, COOHHorseradish peroxidase[152]
Chitosan-AlginateEntrapment–NH2, –OHAmyl glucosidase[153]
ZnO-SiO2Cross-linking–OHHorseradish peroxidase[154]
Silica-LigninAdsorption–OH, C = Oglucose oxidase[155]
Summary of hybrid nanoplatforms applied for enzymes immobilization.

Applications of ENB in medical activities

Therapeutic platforms

Therapeutic enzymes like other enzymes can be loaded onto nanomaterials and applied as a platform in different applications (Table 3). In this regard, it was shown that a magnetic carrier could handover streptokinase to the arterial thrombosis of the dog with high efficiency and high concentration [94]. In another study, Kempe and Kempe [95] exhibited that with the covalent bonding of magnetic NPs (10–30 nm) to the plasminogen activator as a protease, in addition to enhancing the enzyme stability, successful treatment of anti-thrombosis could be performed. On the other hand, it has been shown that the use of liposomes coated with PEG for entrapping tissue plasminogen activator results in greater stability of the enzyme in the blood up to 9 h versus the free enzyme with one hour due to preventing plasma clearance and enhancing the activity of the enzyme [96]. Moreover, Piras et al. [97] developed the enriched urokinase loading onto polymeric NPs based on a hydrophobic absorption gradient with 83% initial activity of the enzyme for thrombolysis treatment.
Table 3

Therapeutic enzymes immobilized on nanomaterials.

EnzymeNanomaterialsApplicationRef.
Bilirubin oxidaseAlbumin aggregateTreatment of neonatal jaundice[156]
ChymotrypsinMagneticPancreatic insufficiency[157]
Serine endopeptidaseAntithrombotic therapyThrombolytic activities[158]
ChymotrypsinElectrospinning nanofibersPancreatic insufficiency[159]
Beta-GalactosidaseMagneticLactose intolerance[160]
TyrosinaseTreatment of melanoma cancerPolylactic-acid nanocapsules[103]
LysozymeAntimicrobial therapiesNanofiber mats[161]
AsparginasePEGylatedAcute lymphoblastic leukemia[162]
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenaseSiO2-based matrixJaundice[163]
Therapeutic enzymes immobilized on nanomaterials. The use of microporous fibrin nanocomposites as a potential scaffold in entrapping the alkaline phosphatase with a covalent bond for bone regeneration resulted in a complete recovery of bone repair in vitro [58]. Researchers also used DNA and AuNP scaffolds to stabilize and improve the activity of alcohol oxidase for alcohol detoxification, which received reliable responses on clinical trials in vivo [98]. Furthermore, despite the high variation in the loading of the tyrosinase on nanomaterials in the medical field, such as ZnO nanorods [99], carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [100], magnetic nanobeads, [101] and chitosan [102], it has been recently shown that the nanocapsules of the polyhemoglobin–tyrosinase complex reduced the activity of the melanoma cells in the murine tumor model [103]. In another study, Yun et al. [104] were able to reduce the brain inflammation, reperfusion injury, and the possibility of stroke with the superoxide dismutase (SOD) encapsulated by liposome and polymer PLGA to increase stability, higher passage and higher enzyme accumulation in the damaged area. Meanwhile, the use of targeted polymeric NPs containing SOD and catalase after 30 min of injecting could provide strong protection from lung inflammation of the mouse due to the prevention of endotoxin production (Fig. 1A) [105]. Also, Martinez et al. [106] developed a dermal patch of the keratinase along with enrofloxacin antibiotic by the nano-gel from alcohol and pectin, which enzyme activity in this nano-composite was 100% of its initial enzyme activity with a higher stability and performance on the skin.
Fig. 1

(A): a; Endothelial targeted antioxidant NPs formation scheme by controlled precipitation, b; Binding of Ab-PAC to cultured endothelial cells. 125I- labeled PACs incubated with cells at 37 °C, rinsed, lysed and measured for radioactivity, c; Tissue distribution of intravenous injected PACs into mice after 30 min circulation time. Protection by endothelial-targeted catalase PACs from oxidative stress in vitro (d) and in vivo based on brochoalveolar lavage (BAL) protein (e-f) [105]. (B): a; transmission electron micrograph of DendGDP NPs, b; Release of Dox from the NPs in the absence or presence of cathepsin (50 U), c; near-infrared fluorescence images for CT26-bearing male nude BALB/c mice. Dox itself or Dox-conjugated dendrimer NPs (5 mg/kg) were injected into the tail vein of each mouse. The major organs were removed from each mouse 48 h after injection [108].

(A): a; Endothelial targeted antioxidant NPs formation scheme by controlled precipitation, b; Binding of Ab-PAC to cultured endothelial cells. 125I- labeled PACs incubated with cells at 37 °C, rinsed, lysed and measured for radioactivity, c; Tissue distribution of intravenous injected PACs into mice after 30 min circulation time. Protection by endothelial-targeted catalase PACs from oxidative stress in vitro (d) and in vivo based on brochoalveolar lavage (BAL) protein (e-f) [105]. (B): a; transmission electron micrograph of DendGDP NPs, b; Release of Dox from the NPs in the absence or presence of cathepsin (50 U), c; near-infrared fluorescence images for CT26-bearing male nude BALB/c mice. Dox itself or Dox-conjugated dendrimer NPs (5 mg/kg) were injected into the tail vein of each mouse. The major organs were removed from each mouse 48 h after injection [108].

Drug delivery

Enzymes can be used as agents in the drug delivery systems based on controlled release of drugs via enzyme reaction under specific conditions. In other words, targeting ligands in drug carriers are activated by enzymes to enter the selective cell to release the drug. The most important enzymes studied in this field are proteases, lipases and glycosidases. In this way, the NPs are assembled simultaneously with decomposed units, which, the drug is released after the digestion of the NP in the presence of the enzyme. This method can be very effective in reducing the secondary effects and toxicity due to the partial accumulation of drugs in non-target tissue due to the absence of required enzymes. Accordingly, Law et al. [107] designed a sequence of peptides that can diffuse the therapeutic factors by interaction with the protease. In the cellular model, it was shown that with the use of dendrimers containing Gly-Phe-Leu-Gly peptide-sequences linked to doxorubicin (Dox), the cell death process increases with the presence of cathepsin B enzymes (Fig. 1B) [108]. Furthermore, Kang et al. [109] developed peptide nano-polymers for gene delivery that were activated in the presence of protein kinase or protease and induced drug transfer to the cells in vitro and in vivo. Similarly, it has been shown that the application of a peptide sequence containing a glycine-glycine bond attached to a nano-polymer (N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide) and Dox that is degraded by protease, in addition to increasing the targeted release of drug in breast cancer, it can produce a higher stability and lower toxicity [110]. In the animal model, Singh et al. [111] and Liu et al. [112] reported that the Dox attached to the mesoporous SiO2 NP by peptide-sequence in response to the activity of the protease accumulated in the tumor tissue, led to cell apoptosis. In this line, the researchers showed that an antitumor ether lipids drug delivery based on the phospholipase A2 activity, which reduced drug toxicity, the increase of membrane permeability and drug performance [113]. In some cases, a linker susceptible to two or more enzymes can be established to improve the response of a developed platform to enzyme activity. For example, it was determined that the cyclodextrin caps of the cavities of the SiO2 NPs would be degraded by both lipase and amylase [114]. Since in the cancer cells, the emalase level is 85 times higher than that of normal cells [115], Ferguson and Duncan [116] described that sugar NPs provide drug delivery to the tumor site without cytotoxicity against normal cells. Also, this drug delivery system can be used as a potential platform in increasing drug stability by transporting drugs to cancer cells as well as decomposing glycosidic linkages by the amylase.

Biological assays

The real time monitoring of the biological events and simultaneously developing therapeutic approaches is known to be possible via examining chemical compounds such as glucose or urea [117]. Therefore, the use of enzymes as biosensors has received a great deal of interest in the control of diseases or physiological activities [118]. The use of ENB as a biosensor for diagnostic and therapeutic activities not only requires complete assurance of the biosensors' functional parameters, it is important to ensure that the sensor system does not present a hazard to the patient. Nevertheless, in vivo biosensors based on ENBs have attracted a number of researchers because of their important role in controlling some diseases, especially diabetes which is a global problem [119]. For instance, Chen et al. [120] in a short-term (21-d) and Luo et al. [121] in a long-term (295-d) period by designing a glucose oxidase (GOx)-based biosensing platform loaded on poly[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate] containing insulin were able to control blood glucose levels in the both non-fasting and fasting models by implanting the designed nanobiosensor in the animal's arm. As blood glucose increases, the GOx is activated in ENB which converts peripheral glucose to glucuronic acid. Changes in environmental acidity caused by glucuronic acid accumulation alter the structure of the polymer and result in release of insulin [120]. Likewise, Chu et al. [122] by providing an albumin-based membrane containing GOx, catalase, and manganese NPs were able to control glucose in blood based on insulin release in diabetic rats over a 7-day period by altering the environmental acidity via GOx activity. Moreover, in the animal model, Gu et al. [123] designed a nano-network of alginate and chitosan containing insulin capsules which insulin released by increasing blood glucose levels due to the activity of the GOx in the network and the bond breaking of polymer and insulin. It has also been shown that insulin can be used to control blood glucose based on solving insulin-containing polymeric vesicles due to the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance change. In this regard, Hu et al. [124] were able to control the blood glucose of diabetic rats at 20, 30, and 50 min based on concentrations of 268, 330, and 450 mg/dL, respectively, by designing vesicles made of H2O2-sensitive copolymers [PEG and phenylboronic ester (PBE)-conjugated polyserine] containing insulin and GOx. With activation of the GOx and H2O2 generation, the vesicles components breakdown which releases insulin. Based on this structure and enzymatic activity, drugs can be delivered to the target tissue or released into the body. Recently, to accelerate responsiveness to a platform containing insulin, Mohammadpour et al. [125] using PLGA and chitosan polymers and loading of both catalase and GOx were able to respond rapidly to any changes in blood glucose based on copolymer degradation induced by gluconic acid accumulation to alter the platform acidity under diabetic rat skin. However, any response to blood glucose variation without the burst release of insulin from the nanoplatform is a major challenge. Indeed, the simultaneous use of two enzymes can provide a rapid response to any changes in blood glucose. While, the use of copolymers that provide greater rigidity of the platform can guarantee the duration of solid support integrity. In this regard, it was determined that the presence of catalase and GOx in the copolymer synthesized from dextran with a high cyclic acetyl content, not only alters the kinetics of insulin release in diabetic rats, but also enhances the rate of response to glucose variation by immobilized enzymes [126]. On the other hand, there are reports of the use of inorganic NPs such as SiO2 to increase the stability of the platform for regulating blood glucose level [127], [128], [129]. In this technique, mesoporous NPs containing GOx and catalase coated with polymers linked to micro-needles are generally sensitive to any changes in blood glucose. In this context, Jiang et al. [130] by designing ENB located on skin including polyethyleneimine with catalase and GOx on insulin-containing mesoporous bioactive glass NPs, were able to control the blood glucose changes of diabetic rats by prolonging polymer degradation induced by enzymes activation and insulin release (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

(A): a; Schematic representation of the glucose-sensitive insulin delivery system using glucose-sensitive BGNs, b; The glucose-sensitive insulin released from the MNs in vivo, c; Profiles of insulin release in different pH, d; SEM images of BGNs-GOx/CAT MNs, e; Profiles of blood glucose levels after Ins-BGNs-GOx/CAT MNs injection of insulin treated with diabetic rats, f; Fluorescence and bright-field histological of FITC-labeled insulin-loaded MNs attached on diabetes rats, g; Histological sections of spleen, lung, and kidney of diabetic rat after treated [130].

(A): a; Schematic representation of the glucose-sensitive insulin delivery system using glucose-sensitive BGNs, b; The glucose-sensitive insulin released from the MNs in vivo, c; Profiles of insulin release in different pH, d; SEM images of BGNs-GOx/CAT MNs, e; Profiles of blood glucose levels after Ins-BGNs-GOx/CAT MNs injection of insulin treated with diabetic rats, f; Fluorescence and bright-field histological of FITC-labeled insulin-loaded MNs attached on diabetes rats, g; Histological sections of spleen, lung, and kidney of diabetic rat after treated [130]. Taken together, these reports indicate that drug delivery systems based on biosensing activities of GOx or catalase is a promising strategy for the treatment of wide range diseases.

Enzymatic nanobiosensors

An enzymatic nanobiosensor is a valuable method for analyzing various types of biomaterials in medicine, pathology, pharmacy, and so on. In the clinical field, enzymatic nanobiosensors can accelerate laboratory processes at a lower cost [118], whereas a limited number of them are available in the laboratory. The enzymatic nanobiosensors are essentially designed based on the existence of a specific catalyst for binding to an analyte that can increase selectivity, sensitivity, and analytical signaling of the sensors [131]. Because of the wide variation in enzymatic nanobiosensors [132], [133], [134] and the presence of numerous reviews in this field [23], [24], [135], this paper focuses on the nanostructure of paper-based biosensors, wearable biosensing tools, and lab-on-a-chip or microfluidic instruments.

Paper-based enzymatic nanobiosensors for medical detection

Paper-based enzymatic nanobiosensors that were introduced in 2007 are a powerful detection (Table 4) and portable instrument which greatly reduces production and maintenance costs. To increase the sensitivity and selectivity of paper sensors that are almost fabricated by photolithography, laser, and screen printing, the use of nanomaterials in its layers was also used. Enzymatic agents, cofactors and colorimetric dyes were also immobilized on nanomaterials in addition to the paper substrate. In this regard, Ornatska et al. [136] reported that ceria NPs along with the GOx onto filter paper in the presence of urinary glucose could change the color of the paper sensor from white to yellow. They declined the glucose limit of detection to 0.5 mM and linear range up to 100 mM. Analogously, Cho et al. [137] developed a paper enzymatic nanobiosensor with a GOx capable of detecting a level of glucose from a sweat with a range of 0.02–1.0 mg glucose mL−1 (Fig. 3A). Also, another study showed that electrochemical paper nanosensors based on AgNPs decorated boron-doped diamond onto paper with cholesterol oxidase could detect cholesterol [138]. In addition, with the application of GO in paper-based electrochemical nanobiosensors along with acetylthiocholine chloride, Panraksa et al. [139] provided diagnosis of acetylcholinesterase in the blood at a detection limit of 0.1 U/mL in range of 0.1–15 U/mL.
Table 4

Paper-based enzymatic nanobiosensors.

EnzymeNanostructureAnalyteMethodDetection limitRef.
GOxTungsten disulfide nanosheetsBlood glucoseColorimetric method2.9 µM[164]
GOxMFe2O4(M = Mg, Ni, Cu)Glucose in the urineColorimetric biosensing4.5 × 10-7 M[165]
GlucosedehydrogenaseAuNPsDihydronicotinamideadenine dinucleotideColorimetric readout12.5 µM[166]
HRPAuNPsNucleic acidLateral flow strip0.3 pM[167]
CholesteroloxidaseAgNPsCholesterolAmperometric detection0.25 mg/dL[138]
Acetyl thiocholine esteraseAuNPsacetylthiocholineColorimetric method0.5 µM[168]
AcetylcholinesteraseCNTsnerve agentsLateral flow strip0.02 nM[169]
Fig. 3

A: a-b; Power outputs and polarization curves with varying concentration of glucose in artificial sweat; (a) 0.02 mg/mL (~100 µM); (b) 0.2 mg/mL (~1 mM), c; The glucose levels in sweat were monitored immediately 30 min after the beginning of the exercise [137]. B: (a) Schematic diagram of a wireless operation of the iontophoretic-sensing tattoo device for transdermal alcohol sensing. In the diagrams of the tattoo-base device, blue and red highlights show the active zones during iontophoresis and amperometric detection, respectively, b; Control experiments without drinking, c; Experiments with consumption of 12 oz of beer measured from two different human subjects, before and after drinking alcohol beverage [145]. C: a; Pictures demonstrating NFC between a sweat monitoring device and a smartphone to launch software for image capture and analysis, b; Results of stress distribution associated with the devices on phantom skin and respective optical images under bending with 5 cm radius, c; colorimetric detection reservoirs that enable determination of total water loss and concentrations of lactate, glucose, creatinine, pH, and chloride ions in sweat, d; images of two different types of sweat patches (small and large harvesting areas) applied to the lower back and volar forearm collected at various times during the study [148].

Paper-based enzymatic nanobiosensors. A: a-b; Power outputs and polarization curves with varying concentration of glucose in artificial sweat; (a) 0.02 mg/mL (~100 µM); (b) 0.2 mg/mL (~1 mM), c; The glucose levels in sweat were monitored immediately 30 min after the beginning of the exercise [137]. B: (a) Schematic diagram of a wireless operation of the iontophoretic-sensing tattoo device for transdermal alcohol sensing. In the diagrams of the tattoo-base device, blue and red highlights show the active zones during iontophoresis and amperometric detection, respectively, b; Control experiments without drinking, c; Experiments with consumption of 12 oz of beer measured from two different human subjects, before and after drinking alcohol beverage [145]. C: a; Pictures demonstrating NFC between a sweat monitoring device and a smartphone to launch software for image capture and analysis, b; Results of stress distribution associated with the devices on phantom skin and respective optical images under bending with 5 cm radius, c; colorimetric detection reservoirs that enable determination of total water loss and concentrations of lactate, glucose, creatinine, pH, and chloride ions in sweat, d; images of two different types of sweat patches (small and large harvesting areas) applied to the lower back and volar forearm collected at various times during the study [148].

Wearable biosensing devices

Integrating smart tools such as mobile phones, tablets, watches and flexible electronic devices with biosensing techniques can in addition to instantaneous medical monitoring and easy transport, provide quick collection of real-time biometric data at single way [140]. The best practical example in this scope is the continuous and extensive control of blood glucose levels among diabetics and athletes in periodic competitions. In this regard, Kudo et al. [141] and Iguchi et al. [142] produced a wearable enzymatic nanobiosensor with flexible oxygen and hydrogen peroxide electrodes, respectively, that could detect glucose level in tears with a range of 0.025–1.475 mM and a range of 0.06 to 2.00 mM. Similarly, in another study, a combination of sol–gel as a contact lens with GOx was used to determine the level of glucose with rapid rate and high precision (0.1–0.6 mM) [143]. Also, Jia et al. [144] demonstrated a wearable enzymatic nanobiosensor to determine the level of lactate with lactate oxidase in the sweat of cyclist sports with linearity up to 20 mM. Meanwhile, another study showed that the determination of alcohol level by alcohol dehydrogenase immobilized on the wearable nanobiosensor through sweat is possible (Fig. 3B) [145].

Lab-on-a-chip or microfluidic devices

Lab-on-a-chip and microfluidics are tools for analyzing samples with small volume, whereas designed to integrate multiple experiments. The main purpose of these tools is access to high precision and selection, and the lack of manual preparation of samples. In this line, Chikkaveeraiah et al. [146] identified the products of tissue culture by integrating cell culture into microfluidic reservoirs and using Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) deposited on AuNPs in canals. Furthermore, Wisitsoraat et al. [147] were able to measure the cholesterol levels of 60 specimens per hour by using cholesterol oxidase immobilized on CNTs based on amperometric sensors in microfluidic channels. In an experimental, the concentration of glucose, lactate, chloride, and pH of the secreted fluid derived from the sweat glands cultured in the microfluidic reservoirs was determined by immobilizing the enzymes like a peroxidase, Keratinase and oxidase in the channels (Fig. 3C) [148]. The change in the color of the fluid introduced into the channels caused by the enzyme activity indicated the concentration of the desired products. As well as, Backer et al. [149] developed a lab-on-a-chip microfluidic system based on amperometric sensor to measure glucose, glutamate and glutamine by inserting enzymes of GOx, glutamate oxidase and glutaminase onto platinum NPs with a detection limit of 0.05 mM for glucose and glutamate and 0.1 mM for glutamine. Besides, Ali et al. [150] using a microfluidic system based on lab on chip and cholesterol esterase and oxidase immobilized on nickel NPs and CNTs in canals, were able to detect cholesterol levels in body fluids with a sensitivity of 2.2 mA/mM/cm2.

Challenges and future perspective

Despite the benefits of using ENB in biomedical activities, these compounds still face serious challenges, most notably: One of the major challenges in enzyme loading on porous NPs such as porous SiO2, scaffolds and even porous inorganic metal oxides, is the blockage of pores in tanks embedded in the platform. Increasing the enzymatic layers on the platform as well as the presence of enzymes that have not been fully incorporated into the tank can reduce the embedded gap diameter, which adversely affects the performance of the ENB. Moreover, because most designed ENBs are saturated with enzyme layer-by-layer aggregation, excessive enzyme accumulation on the support or part of it can impair the overall performance of the enzymes. Therefore, by creating specific sites on the NPs for binding to the enzyme, in addition to reducing the consumption of enzyme, it can prevent the reduction of the unwanted enzyme activity. Despite increasing enzyme stability and reproducibility upon ENB, a decrease in the content of enzyme loading is observed due to changes in the enzyme active site resulted from the conformational effects induced by the nanomaterials or the unfavorable binding of the enzyme to the nanomaterials. Since the developed NPs do not have a complete uniformity, so the size and shape of the NPs can strongly influence the structure of the enzymes. For this purpose, biological methods that produce more uniform NPs can be used as an alternative for fabrication of potential NPs. Another major challenge in development of ENB is the incompatibility of nanomaterials with biological activities that require surface modification. Surface modification sometimes reduces the performance of nanomaterials in enzyme transfer to the targeted tissue due to the lack of targeted ligands. On the other hand, the presence of ligands along with the enzymes can provide an unfavorable binding of the enzyme-ligand, which reduces the enzyme activity. Although targeting by entrapment/encapsulation may result only in partial structural changes of enzymes, it was found that enzyme function was reduced by creating rigid structures in the enzyme by NPs modification. The development of a promising strategy is difficult because of the lack of sufficient information on NPs-enzyme, enzyme-ligand and enzyme-enzyme interactions after immobilization of enzymes into the solid supports. Next challenge is the lack of confidence in the advantages of inorganic substrates such as inorganic metal oxide in biosensing activities in vivo, due to the long-term stability and also the unintended catalytic effects resulting from removal of the surface enzyme. According to the reported literature, the use of polymers or inorganic NPs less than 10 nm can greatly reduce this problem. However, the use of ENB in biosensing has generally been used in implants or skin attachments. Despite the widespread use of ENB in therapeutic activities and drug delivery to cancer cells due to the possibility of corona protein formation on inorganic NPs such as metal oxidize in blood and non-target cells, the risk of unwanted toxicity increases. However, with the change of nanomaterials used in the platform, the limitation caused by the presence of corona proteins has been partially controlled. Taken together, the use of ENB instead of free enzyme in biomedical activities not only increases the targeting, sustainability, and reduces the therapeutic costs, but also enables the synchronization of therapeutic activities such as PTT or magnetic therapy based on the presence of metal oxide NPs.

Summary and outlook

Although free enzymes have higher enzymatic activity than enzymes loaded on objects, ENBs have received a great deal of attention in biomedical activities due to increased stability of enzymes and even improved enzymatic activity at inappropriate temperature and pH. Achieving the method of isolating and purifying proteins in solution proves that by using NPs, it is possible to remove certain enzymes from raw solutions. One of the future fields of research in the field of using NPs is the preparation of adsorbents with special functional groups to facilitate the specific or selective extraction of enzymes from different samples for biomedical applications. The use of ENB in the biomedical application can result in the development of simple, fast and sensitive methods for drug targeting, anticancer and biosensing platforms. This integration in the future can lead to a set-up of more potential and rapid methods for promising development of biomedical modalities based on immobilized enzymes. There are many challenges before the practical application of ENB in the biomedical applications. First, the potential dangers of ENB to human health must be fully assessed. Another issue is the use of coatings that do not have a health grade and can lead to health risks. Therefore, one of the important areas of research is the development of ENB that can be used in a safe aspect in the development of biomedical platforms.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.
  121 in total

1.  Design of polymeric carriers for cancer-specific gene targeting: utilization of abnormal protein kinase Calpha activation in cancer cells.

Authors:  Jeong-Hun Kang; Daisuke Asai; Jong-Hwan Kim; Takeshi Mori; Riki Toita; Tetsuro Tomiyama; Yoji Asami; Jun Oishi; Yuko T Sato; Takuro Niidome; Byungdug Jun; Hideki Nakashima; Yoshiki Katayama
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 2.  Multi-faceted strategy based on enzyme immobilization with reactant adsorption and membrane technology for biocatalytic removal of pollutants: A critical review.

Authors:  Jakub Zdarta; Anne S Meyer; Teofil Jesionowski; Manuel Pinelo
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 14.227

Review 3.  Involvement of planned cell death of necroptosis in cancer treatment by nanomaterials: Recent advances and future perspectives.

Authors:  Majid Sharifi; Sara Haji Hosseinali; Ali Akbar Saboury; Eva Szegezdi; Mojtaba Falahati
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Endothelial delivery of antioxidant enzymes loaded into non-polymeric magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Michael Chorny; Elizabeth Hood; Robert J Levy; Vladimir R Muzykantov
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Effect of copper oxide nanoparticles on the conformation and activity of β-galactosidase.

Authors:  Gulam Rabbani; Mohd Jahir Khan; Abrar Ahmad; Mohamad Yusof Maskat; Rizwan Hasan Khan
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 5.268

6.  Effect of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles on growth and physiology of globally important food crops: A critical review.

Authors:  Muhammad Rizwan; Shafaqat Ali; Muhammad Farooq Qayyum; Yong Sik Ok; Muhammad Adrees; Muhammad Ibrahim; Muhammad Zia-Ur-Rehman; Mujahid Farid; Farhat Abbas
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 10.588

7.  Dextrin-phospholipase A2: synthesis and evaluation as a bioresponsive anticancer conjugate.

Authors:  Elaine L Ferguson; Ruth Duncan
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 8.  Mesoporous silica nanoparticles: synthesis, classification, drug loading, pharmacokinetics, biocompatibility, and application in drug delivery.

Authors:  Zhe Li; Yongtai Zhang; Nianping Feng
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 6.648

9.  Injectable nano-network for glucose-mediated insulin delivery.

Authors:  Zhen Gu; Alex A Aimetti; Qun Wang; Tram T Dang; Yunlong Zhang; Omid Veiseh; Hao Cheng; Robert S Langer; Daniel G Anderson
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 15.881

10.  Targeted Polymeric Nanoparticles for Brain Delivery of High Molecular Weight Molecules in Lysosomal Storage Disorders.

Authors:  Marika Salvalaio; Laura Rigon; Daniela Belletti; Francesca D'Avanzo; Francesca Pederzoli; Barbara Ruozi; Oriano Marin; Maria Angela Vandelli; Flavio Forni; Maurizio Scarpa; Rosella Tomanin; Giovanni Tosi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Atropine-Phosphotungestate Polymeric-Based Metal Oxide Nanoparticles for Potentiometric Detection in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms.

Authors:  Seham S Alterary; Maha F El-Tohamy; Gamal A E Mostafa; Haitham Alrabiah
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 2.  Explaining chemical clues of metal organic framework-nanozyme nano-/micro-motors in targeted treatment of cancers: benchmarks and challenges.

Authors:  Mojtaba Falahati; Majid Sharifi; Timo L M Ten Hagen
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 10.435

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.