Literature DB >> 34601738

In vivo hyperCEST imaging: Experimental considerations for a reliable contrast.

Christian T McHugh1,2, Michele Kelley1,2, Nicholas J Bryden1,2, Rosa T Branca1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: HyperCEST contrast relies on the reduction of the solvent signal after selective saturation of the solute magnetization. The scope of this work is to outline the experimental conditions needed to obtain a reliable hyperCEST contrast in vivo, where the "solvent" signal (ie, the dissolved-phase signal) may change over time due to the increase in xenon (Xe) accumulation into tissue.
METHODS: Hyperpolarized 129 Xe was delivered to mice at a constant volume and rate using a mechanical ventilator, which triggered the saturation, excitation, and acquisition of the MR signal during the exhale phase of the breath cycle-either every breath or every 2, 3, or 4 breaths. Serial Z-spectra and hyperCEST images were acquired before and after a bolus injection of cucurbit[6]uril to assess possible signal fluctuations and instabilities.
RESULTS: The intensity of the dissolved-phase Xe signal was observed to first increase immediately after the beginning of the hyperpolarized gas inhalation and NMR acquisition, and then decrease before reaching a steady-state condition. Once a steady-state dissolved-phase magnetization was established, a reliable hyperCEST contrast, exceeding 40% signal reduction, was observed.
CONCLUSION: A reliable hyperCEST contrast can only be obtained after establishing a steady-state dissolved phase 129 Xe magnetization. Under stable physiological conditions, a steady-state dissolved-phase Xe magnetization is only achieved after a series of Xe inhalations and RF excitations, and it requires synchronization of the breathing rate with the MR acquisition.
© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemical exchange; cucurbit[6]uril; hyperCEST; hyperpolarized 129Xe; molecular imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34601738      PMCID: PMC8776610          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  30 in total

1.  Cucurbiturils: from synthesis to high-affinity binding and catalysis.

Authors:  Khaleel I Assaf; Werner M Nau
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Quantitative chemical exchange saturation transfer with hyperpolarized nuclei (qHyper-CEST): sensing xenon-host exchange dynamics and binding affinities by NMR.

Authors:  M Kunth; C Witte; L Schröder
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Protein Nanostructures Produce Self-Adjusting Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast through Physical Gas Partitioning.

Authors:  Martin Kunth; George J Lu; Christopher Witte; Mikhail G Shapiro; Leif Schröder
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  Assessment of lymphatic impairment and interstitial protein accumulation in patients with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema using CEST MRI.

Authors:  Manus J Donahue; Paula C M Donahue; Swati Rane; Christopher R Thompson; Megan K Strother; Allison O Scott; Seth A Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  A Constant-Volume Ventilator and Gas Recapture System for Hyperpolarized Gas MRI of Mouse and Rat Lungs.

Authors:  John Nouls; Manuel Fanarjian; Laurence Hedlund; Bastiaan Driehuys
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.176

6.  Histogram Analysis of Amide Proton Transfer Imaging to Identify Contrast-enhancing Low-Grade Brain Tumor That Mimics High-Grade Tumor: Increased Accuracy of MR Perfusion.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park; Ho Sung Kim; Kye Jin Park; Choong Gon Choi; Sang Joon Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Four-pool modeling of proton exchange processes in biological systems in the presence of MRI-paramagnetic chemical exchange saturation transfer (PARACEST) agents.

Authors:  Alex X Li; Robert H E Hudson; John W Barrett; Craig K Jones; Stephen H Pasternak; Robert Bartha
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Amide proton transfer imaging of the breast at 3 T: establishing reproducibility and possible feasibility assessing chemotherapy response.

Authors:  Adrienne N Dula; Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard D Dortch; Blake E Dewey; Jennifer G Whisenant; Gregory D Ayers; Thomas E Yankeelov; Seth A Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Differentiation between glioma and radiation necrosis using molecular magnetic resonance imaging of endogenous proteins and peptides.

Authors:  Jinyuan Zhou; Erik Tryggestad; Zhibo Wen; Bachchu Lal; Tingting Zhou; Rachel Grossman; Silun Wang; Kun Yan; De-Xue Fu; Eric Ford; Betty Tyler; Jaishri Blakeley; John Laterra; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  An Expanded Palette of Xenon-129 NMR Biosensors.

Authors:  Yanfei Wang; Ivan J Dmochowski
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 22.384

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.