Manus J Donahue1,2,3,4, Paula C M Donahue5,6, Swati Rane1, Christopher R Thompson7, Megan K Strother1, Allison O Scott1, Seth A Smith1. 1. Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee. 3. Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee. 4. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee. 5. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee. 6. Dayani Center for Health and Wellness, Nashville, Tennessee. 7. Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Lymphatic impairment is known to reduce quality of life in some of the most crippling diseases of the 21st century, including obesity, lymphedema, and cancer. However, the lymphatics are not nearly as well-understood as other bodily systems, largely owing to a lack of sensitive imaging technologies that can be applied using standard clinical equipment. Here, proton exchange-weighted MRI is translated to the lymphatics in patients with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS: Healthy volunteers (N = 8) and BCRL patients (N = 7) were scanned at 3 Tesla using customized structural MRI and amide proton transfer (APT) chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI in sequence with the hypothesis that APT effects would be elevated in lymphedematous tissue. APT contrast, lymphedema stage, symptomatology, and histology information were evaluated. RESULTS: No significant difference between proton-weighted APT contrast in the right and left arms of healthy controls was observed. An increase in APT contrast in the affected arms of patients was found (P = 0.025; Cohen's d = 2.4), and variability among patients was consistent with documented damage to lymphatics as quantified by lymphedema stage. CONCLUSION: APT CEST MRI may have relevance for evaluating lymphatic impairment in patients with BCRL, and may extend to other pathologies where lymphatic compromise is evident.
PURPOSE:Lymphatic impairment is known to reduce quality of life in some of the most crippling diseases of the 21st century, including obesity, lymphedema, and cancer. However, the lymphatics are not nearly as well-understood as other bodily systems, largely owing to a lack of sensitive imaging technologies that can be applied using standard clinical equipment. Here, proton exchange-weighted MRI is translated to the lymphatics in patients with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS: Healthy volunteers (N = 8) and BCRL patients (N = 7) were scanned at 3 Tesla using customized structural MRI and amide proton transfer (APT) chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI in sequence with the hypothesis that APT effects would be elevated in lymphedematous tissue. APT contrast, lymphedema stage, symptomatology, and histology information were evaluated. RESULTS: No significant difference between proton-weighted APT contrast in the right and left arms of healthy controls was observed. An increase in APT contrast in the affected arms of patients was found (P = 0.025; Cohen's d = 2.4), and variability among patients was consistent with documented damage to lymphatics as quantified by lymphedema stage. CONCLUSION: APT CEST MRI may have relevance for evaluating lymphatic impairment in patients with BCRL, and may extend to other pathologies where lymphatic compromise is evident.
Authors: Constance M Chen; Stefan J Cano; Anne F Klassen; Tari King; Colleen McCarthy; Peter G Cordeiro; Monica Morrow; Andrea L Pusic Journal: Breast J Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Jun Hua; Craig K Jones; Jaishri Blakeley; Seth A Smith; Peter C M van Zijl; Jinyuan Zhou Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: William A Grissom; Mohammad-Mehdi Khalighi; Laura I Sacolick; Brian K Rutt; Mika W Vogel Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Vipul R Sheth; Yuguo Li; Liu Qi Chen; Christine M Howison; Chris A Flask; Mark D Pagel Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: María Torres Lacomba; María José Yuste Sánchez; Alvaro Zapico Goñi; David Prieto Merino; Orlando Mayoral del Moral; Ester Cerezo Téllez; Elena Minayo Mogollón Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-01-12
Authors: Rachelle Crescenzi; Paula M C Donahue; Katherine G Hartley; Aditi A Desai; Allison O Scott; Vaughn Braxton; Helen Mahany; Sarah K Lants; Manus J Donahue Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jiadi Xu; Kannie W Y Chan; Xiang Xu; Nirbhay Yadav; Guanshu Liu; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Rachelle Crescenzi; Paula M Donahue; Vaughn G Braxton; Allison O Scott; Helen B Mahany; Sarah K Lants; Manus J Donahue Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Rachelle Crescenzi; Paula M C Donahue; Helen Mahany; Sarah K Lants; Manus J Donahue Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Paula M C Donahue; Rachelle Crescenzi; Allison O Scott; Vaughn Braxton; Aditi Desai; Seth A Smith; John Jordi; Ingrid M Meszoely; Ana M Grau; Rondi M Kauffmann; Raeshell S Sweeting; Kandace Spotanski; Sheila H Ridner; Manus J Donahue Journal: Lymphat Res Biol Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.589
Authors: Lin Chen; Haifeng Zeng; Xiang Xu; Nirbhay N Yadav; Shuhui Cai; Nicolaas A Puts; Peter B Barker; Tong Li; Robert G Weiss; Peter C M van Zijl; Jiadi Xu Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Paula M C Donahue; Rachelle Crescenzi; Chelsea Lee; Maria Garza; Niral J Patel; Kalen J Petersen; Manus J Donahue Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Sandra Russo; Joan L Walker; Jay W Carlson; Jeanne Carter; Leigh C Ward; Allan Covens; Edward J Tanner; Jane M Armer; Sheila Ridner; Sandi Hayes; Alphonse G Taghian; Cheryl Brunelle; Micael Lopez-Acevedo; Brittany A Davidson; Mark V Schaverien; Sharad A Ghamande; Michael Bernas; Andrea L Cheville; Kathleen J Yost; Kathryn Schmitz; Barbara Coyle; Jeannette Zucker; Danielle Enserro; Stephanie Pugh; Electra D Paskett; Leslie Ford; Worta McCaskill-Stevens Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 5.482