Yanfei Wang1, Ivan J Dmochowski1. 1. Department of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania , 231 South 34th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Abstract
Molecular imaging holds considerable promise for elucidating biological processes in normal physiology as well as disease states, by determining the location and relative concentration of specific molecules of interest. Proton-based magnetic resonance imaging (1H MRI) is nonionizing and provides good spatial resolution for clinical imaging but lacks sensitivity for imaging low-abundance (i.e., submicromolar) molecular markers of disease or environments with low proton densities. To address these limitations, hyperpolarized (hp) 129Xe NMR spectroscopy and MRI have emerged as attractive complementary methodologies. Hyperpolarized xenon is nontoxic and can be readily delivered to patients via inhalation or injection, and improved xenon hyperpolarization technology makes it feasible to image the lungs and brain for clinical applications. In order to target hp 129Xe to biomolecular targets of interest, the concept of "xenon biosensing" was first proposed by a Berkeley team in 2001. The development of xenon biosensors has since focused on modifying organic host molecules (e.g., cryptophanes) via diverse conjugation chemistries and has brought about numerous sensing applications including the detection of peptides, proteins, oligonucleotides, metal ions, chemical modifications, and enzyme activity. Moreover, the large (∼300 ppm) chemical shift window for hp 129Xe bound to host molecules in water makes possible the simultaneous identification of multiple species in solution, that is, multiplexing. Beyond hyperpolarization, a 106-fold signal enhancement can be achieved through a technique known as hyperpolarized 129Xe chemical exchange saturation transfer (hyper-CEST), which shows great potential to meet the sensitivity requirement in many applications. This Account highlights an expanded palette of hyper-CEST biosensors, which now includes cryptophane and cucurbit[6]uril (CB[6]) small-molecule hosts, as well as genetically encoded gas vesicles and single proteins. In 2015, we reported picomolar detection of commercially available CB[6] via hyper-CEST. Inspired by the versatile host-guest chemistry of CB[6], our lab and others developed "turn-on" strategies for CB[6]-hyper-CEST biosensing, demonstrating detection of protein analytes in complex media and specific chemical events. CB[6] is starting to be employed for in vivo imaging applications. We also recently determined that TEM-1 β-lactamase can function as a single-protein reporter for hyper-CEST and observed useful saturation contrast for β-lactamase expressed in bacterial and mammalian cells. These newly developed small-molecule and genetically encoded xenon biosensors offer significant potential to extend the scope of hp 129Xe toward molecular MRI.
Molecular imaging holds considerable promise for elucidating biological processes in normal physiology as well as disease states, by determining the location and relative concentration of specific molecules of interest. Proton-based magnetic resonance imaging (1H MRI) is nonionizing and provides good spatial resolution for clinical imaging but lacks sensitivity for imaging low-abundance (i.e., submicromolar) molecular markers of disease or environments with low proton densities. To address these limitations, hyperpolarized (hp) 129Xe NMR spectroscopy and MRI have emerged as attractive complementary methodologies. Hyperpolarized xenon is nontoxic and can be readily delivered to patients via inhalation or injection, and improved xenon hyperpolarization technology makes it feasible to image the lungs and brain for clinical applications. In order to target hp 129Xe to biomolecular targets of interest, the concept of "xenon biosensing" was first proposed by a Berkeley team in 2001. The development of xenon biosensors has since focused on modifying organic host molecules (e.g., cryptophanes) via diverse conjugation chemistries and has brought about numerous sensing applications including the detection of peptides, proteins, oligonucleotides, metal ions, chemical modifications, and enzyme activity. Moreover, the large (∼300 ppm) chemical shift window for hp 129Xe bound to host molecules in water makes possible the simultaneous identification of multiple species in solution, that is, multiplexing. Beyond hyperpolarization, a 106-fold signal enhancement can be achieved through a technique known as hyperpolarized 129Xe chemical exchange saturation transfer (hyper-CEST), which shows great potential to meet the sensitivity requirement in many applications. This Account highlights an expanded palette of hyper-CEST biosensors, which now includes cryptophane and cucurbit[6]uril (CB[6]) small-molecule hosts, as well as genetically encoded gas vesicles and single proteins. In 2015, we reported picomolar detection of commercially available CB[6] via hyper-CEST. Inspired by the versatile host-guest chemistry of CB[6], our lab and others developed "turn-on" strategies for CB[6]-hyper-CEST biosensing, demonstrating detection of protein analytes in complex media and specific chemical events. CB[6] is starting to be employed for in vivo imaging applications. We also recently determined that TEM-1 β-lactamase can function as a single-protein reporter for hyper-CEST and observed useful saturation contrast for β-lactamase expressed in bacterial and mammalian cells. These newly developed small-molecule and genetically encoded xenon biosensors offer significant potential to extend the scope of hp 129Xe toward molecular MRI.
Magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) is a well-established clinical
imaging method with good spatial resolution and excellent tissue penetration
ability. Pioneering work in the development of 1H MRI contrast
agents has enabled stimuli-responsive detection of metabolites including
enzymes, signaling molecules, and pH values of local environments,
but such agents do not allow detection of most analytes at physiologic
concentration.[1] Paramagnetic contrast agents
function by affecting thermally polarized 1H nuclei in
the local environment; therefore, high micromolar (or greater) concentrations
of contrast agent are typically needed.Hyperpolarized (hp) 129Xe NMR and MRI have emerged as
attractive complements to 1H MRI and have been investigated
in many applications that require significant enhancements in detection
sensitivity.[2−5] The isotope 129Xe is spin-1/2 and possesses several favorable
physical properties that make it a unique candidate for molecular
imaging. First, xenon is very soluble in organic solvents such as
hexane and benzene, as well as aqueous solutions including blood plasma.
As a result, xenon will partition between different solvents or between
blood and tissue, and this feature can be utilized for certain imaging
applications. Second, the large and highly polarizable electron cloud
of xenon affords high affinity for void spaces as well as sensitivity
to its local environment. This translates to a large (∼300
ppm) chemical shift window for 129Xe bound to different
organic host molecules in aqueous solution.[6] Consequently, xenon can display well-resolved chemical shifts, corresponding
to the solvent, small molecules, or proteins with which it associates.
Third, 129Xe can be hyperpolarized (hp) through a two-step
process called spin exchange optical pumping where polarization is
transferred from electronically polarized Rb atoms in the vapor state
to 129Xe nuclei.[7] The 129Xe NMR signal can be increased by more than 10000-fold upon hyperpolarization.
Therefore, low (i.e., micromolar) concentrations of hp 129Xe can produce intense NMR signals. Xenon is found in trace quantities
in air; thus there is no background signal competing with exogenously
supplied hp 129Xe.Finally, for the purpose of in vivo imaging, hp 129Xe has lower toxicity
compared to most paramagnetic metals
currently used as contrast agents for proton-based MRI. The long T1 of hp 129Xe in both gas phase (with
the longest measured T1 of 99 h at 14.1
T[8]) and dissolved phase (∼66 s in
salinewater at 9.4 T[9]) helps in sustaining
the hp 129Xe signal during transport from the hyperpolarizer
to the detection region. It is also worth noting that because signal
averaging in hp MRI is not based on relaxation recovery but on renewed
delivery of hp species for each scan, long T1 does not slow image acquisition. These favorable properties
of xenon have led to many in vivo imaging studies.
Albert et al. first used xenon to image a mouse lung;[10] subsequently, there have been many examples of 129Xe-based imaging of human lungs, chest, and brain,[11] which confirm the biocompatibility of xenon-based MRI.
Cryptophane-Based Xenon Biosensors
Cryptophane
Characterization
It was
discovered in 1998 that cryptophane-A binds xenon reversibly and with
good affinity (KA ≈ 3000 M–1 at rt in C2D2Cl4), and the xenon exchange rate is sufficiently slow to give well
separated xenon signals on a NMR spectrum.[12,13] Early work on cryptophane synthesis and studies of xenon complexation
was reviewed extensively by Brotin and Dutasta.[14] In 2011, we reported a shorter six-step synthesis of trifunctionalized
cryptophane-A derivatives with an improved yield of 6%,[15] building on the work of Brotin et al., who reported
a milder Sc(OTf)3 cyclization for cyclotriguiacylene formation.[16] The use of either tripropargyl cryptophane with
azide–alkyne cycloaddition(s) or trihydroxy cryptophane with
ether linkage(s) allows functionalization of cryptophane with solubilizing
or targeting moieties. Our trifunctionalized water-soluble cryptophanes,
triacetic acid cryptophane (TAAC),[17] tris(triazole
propionic acid) cryptophane (TTPC),[18] and
tris(triazole ethylamine) cryptophane (TTEC),[19] showed similar water solubility to the reported hexa-functionalized
cryptophanes[20] but exhibited significantly
higher xenon-binding affinities. To rationalize these differences,
molecular simulation and free energy perturbation methods were applied
to estimate the affinities of Xe for TAAC, TTPC, and TTEC, as well
as three hexa-acidwater-soluble cryptophanes with varying cavity
size.[21] The simulations showed that displacement
of water from the host cavity is a key component of the xenon binding
equilibrium, and the average number of water molecules within the
cavity is strongly anticorrelated with the free energy of Xe binding
to the different cryptophanes.[21]We also investigated host–guest interactions in cryptophanes
by X-ray crystallography. Co-crystallization of cryptophane-A derivatives
with methanol, xenon, and chloroform revealed that the cavity internal
volume (80–102 Å3) varied with guest size.[22] Importantly, we observed that in the xenon-bound
structure, van der Waals interactions were nearly optimized, with
intermediate interior cavity volume of 85–89 Å3 and guest/host volume ratio of 0.47–0.49. This ratio was
found previously to reside ideally near 0.55 for host–guest
interactions relying purely on dispersion interactions.[23]
Biosensors
Xenon
biosensing can be
achieved by conjugating specific targeting and water-solubilizing
group(s) to cryptophane. The xenon biosensor usually functions by
producing a different 129Xe NMR chemical shift when bound
to the target, due to the sensitivity of the xenon nuclear spin to
any perturbation of the large electron cloud. The first xenon biosensor,
developed by Pines and co-workers in 2001, covalently modified cryptophane-A
with a peptide as the solubilizing element and biotin as the targeting
element.[24] A measurable shift, ∼2.3
ppm, was observed for the xenon biosensor bound to avidin. In a follow-up
study, one resonance was observed for monoallyl-substituted cryptophane-A,
and upon conjugation of the chiral peptide, two peaks 0.15 ppm apart
appeared,[25] which were attributed to the
diastereomers. The observed sensitivity of xenon to diastereomerism
is problematic for many biosensing applications, because it dilutes
the xenon-biomarker signal and complicates peak assignments as well
as efforts to selectively irradiate 129Xe in a specific
environment, as required for many NMR experiments.In 2006,
our laboratory demonstrated the ability of hp 129Xe to
report on protease activity by appending cryptophane with a peptide
substrate for matrix metalloproteinase-7, a known cancer biomarker.[26] In a next study, researchers utilized enantiopure
cryptophane-A grafted to a 20-mer oligonucleotide to detect DNA binding.[27] The 129Xe NMR peak for biosensor
plus complementary DNA strand was shifted 1.5 ppm upfield, with only
one bound peak as expected for single enantiomers. However, at increasing
concentration, both biosensor alone and biosensor plus noncomplementary
strand exhibited multiple Xe@biosensor peaks. This was hypothesized
to be a result of microemulsions and micelles or vesicles formed at
higher concentration.[27] This observation
highlights the importance of well-solubilized xenon biosensors. Most
recently, Kotera et al. attached hexa-carboxylate cryptophane to two
arsenic moieties capable of interacting with proteins that contain
a tetracysteine tag and observed a single peak that was shifted 6.4
ppm upon addition of excess Cys4-tagged peptide.[28]We also developed xenon biosensors targeting integrin
receptors
that are upregulated in many humancancers. Cryptophane was functionalized
with a single linear (RGD)4 peptide repeat[29] or with a cyclic RGDyK peptide and two 3-azidopropionic
acids.[30] We observed only one 4.1 ppm downfield-shifted
peak when the biosensor bound to αvβ3 integrin, indicating again that with a well-solubilized cryptophane
it was possible to engage protein targets using short tethers and
obtain well-resolved 129Xe NMR spectra. In order to investigate
the cell compatibility of xenon biosensors, we fluorescently labeled
the cRGDyK-cryptophane and performed cell uptake, viability, and specificity
studies.[30] This work demonstrated targeting
of αvβ3 integrin and αIIbβ3 integrin with nanomolar affinity and
specificity and low cytotoxicity at concentrations required for NMR
experiments, which paved the way for cellular hp 129Xe
NMR spectroscopy and imaging experiments.[31−33]We have
used carbonic anhydrase II (CAII) and CAI, cytosolic isoforms
of α-CA, as the archetype to guide the development of xenon
biosensors.[34−36] The unique 129Xe NMR chemical shifts for
biosensors bound to CAI or CAII demonstrate the potential of xenon
biosensors to discriminate between isoforms of α-CA, including
the cancer biomarkers CAIX and CAXII.
Enhanced
Detection
The hyperpolarization
of xenon makes it possible to detect directly the signals from low
concentrations of biosensors. When the concentration of biosensor
is low compared to dissolved xenon, the dissolved xenon can act as
a polarization reservoir if just the magnetization of caged xenon
is excited during signal acquisition. This can be achieved by applying
selective pulses when the resonances are well separated.[37] With a 0.1–0.15 s delay between excitation
pulses, there is effectively full recovery of the caged xenon magnetization,
and hence many acquisitions can be taken before the dissolved hp xenon
pool is exhausted. This soft-pulse approach relies on signal averaging
based on the exchange of xenon and allows for detection of low-micromolar
cryptophane.Detection sensitivity can be further improved via
the hyper-CEST technique, which relies on the initial hp 129Xe signal, as well as modulation by chemical exchange saturation
transfer (CEST). Specifically, the 129Xe@host spin pool
is saturated by frequency-selective RF pulses, and through chemical
exchange, the saturated spins transfer to the bulk xenonspin pool
where loss of signal is monitored.[38] Selective
RF pulses are applied for a long period compared to the mean xenon
residence time inside cryptophane-A (∼1 ms at 320 K), allowing
for a single cryptophane molecule to saturate thousands of xenon spins
by the simplest mechanism (Scheme ). This method improved the detection sensitivity of
water-soluble cryptophane to the nanomolar and picomolar range, without
the need for long acquisition times.[38,39] A similar in vivo MRI approach, xenon transfer contrast (XTC), initially
took advantage of the exchange between xenon in gas phase and that
in solution phase to probe lung physiology.[40]
Scheme 1
Chemical Structures of CB[6] and TAAC (Top) and Hyper-CEST Mechanism
Involving Xenon-Binding Molecules Represented by Hexagons (Bottom)
Reproduced
with permission from ref (54). Copyright 2015 Royal
Society of Chemistry.
Chemical Structures of CB[6] and TAAC (Top) and Hyper-CEST Mechanism
Involving Xenon-Binding Molecules Represented by Hexagons (Bottom)
Reproduced
with permission from ref (54). Copyright 2015 Royal
Society of Chemistry.Since
its development in 2006, hyper-CEST has been applied
in many
biosensing applications. In 2009, Schlundt et al.[200] modified cryptophane with a hemagglutinin peptide, which
binds to a major histocompatibility complex protein, and observed
a 1-ppm downfield shift. More recently, Schröder and co-workers
acquired hyper-CEST MR images of cell-internalized fluorescein-bearing
cryptophane conjugates,[31] of a peptide-functionalized
liposomal carrier targeting brain endothelial cells,[41] metabolically labeled cell-surface glycans,[42] and cells targeted by antibody-based modular
biosensors.[43]Our laboratory recently
developed a 129Xe biosensor
that labels cancer cells at acidic pH.[44] The cryptophane biosensor was attached to a 30mer EALA-repeat peptide
that is α-helical at pH 5.5 and disordered at pH 7.5. The 129Xe NMR chemical shift at rt was strongly pH-dependent (Δδ
= 3.4 ppm): δ = 64.2 ppm at pH 7.5 vs δ = 67.6 ppm at
pH 5.5. Using hyper-CEST, peptido-cryptophane was detected at low-picomolar
(10–11 M) concentration. As designed, in biosensor-HeLa
cell solutions, peptide-cell membrane insertion at pH 5.5 generated
a 13.4 ppm downfield cryptophane-129Xe NMR chemical shift
relative to pH 7.5 studies (Figure ). The larger separation of the two resonances was
induced by the insertion of cryptophane into lipid membrane, as observed
in other studies.[31−33]
Figure 1
(top) Chemical structure of water-soluble EALA-cryptophane
(WEC).
(bottom) Hyper-CEST 129Xe NMR spectra for 5–10 μM
WEC in a suspension of 1 × 107 cells/mL at pH 7.5:
(a) Xe@cells, red trace; Xe@aq, blue trace; (b) Xe@WECaq and at pH 5.5; (c) Xe@cells, red trace; Xe@aq, blue trace; (d) Xe@WECcells, red trace; Xe@WECaq, blue trace. Reproduced
with permission from ref (44). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
(top) Chemical structure of water-soluble EALA-cryptophane
(WEC).
(bottom) Hyper-CEST 129Xe NMR spectra for 5–10 μM
WEC in a suspension of 1 × 107 cells/mL at pH 7.5:
(a) Xe@cells, red trace; Xe@aq, blue trace; (b) Xe@WECaq and at pH 5.5; (c) Xe@cells, red trace; Xe@aq, blue trace; (d) Xe@WECcells, red trace; Xe@WECaq, blue trace. Reproduced
with permission from ref (44). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
Continued Optimization
of Xe Biosensors
The modular construction of xenon biosensors
allows chemical linkage
of the host molecule to a wide range of targeting agents. A moderate
length linker affords flexibility and holds cryptophane and binding
moiety in proximity, which generates narrow 129Xe NMR lines
while retaining the chemical shift response to the binding event.[35,45]To increase sensitivity, multiple cryptophanes have been tethered
to each targeting element, thereby increasing local concentration
of xenon. This concept was first demonstrated by Mynar et al., who
observed moderate 129Xe signal enhancement using multiple
cryptophanes in a dendrimer with one targeting attachment.[46] Higher sensitivity was later achieved by covalently
attaching several cryptophanes to one targeting module through avidin–biotin
bridges[43] or many cryptophanes to spherical
or rod-like viral capsids.[32,47,48] The dual signal amplification from multiple cryptophanes per target
and many xenon atoms per cryptophane via hyper-CEST greatly expanded
the potential of using xenon biosensors for localized and sensitive
target detection.
Hyperpolarized Xenon in Biomaterials
Hyperpolarized xenon has also been used alone to characterize biological
environments. Initially, Albert et al. showed that xenon in the presence
of red blood cells gave rise to two signals in the NMR spectrum.[49] The ∼20 ppm separation between two peaks
was attributed to the interaction of xenon with hemoglobin present
in the intracellular compartment of RBCs.[9] In 2011, Berthault and co-workers reported the 129Xe
NMR spectra of prokaryotic, eukaryotic, vegetal, and yeast cells,
where two signals separated by only a few ppm at high cell density
(107–108 mammalian cells/mL) were observed.[50]In 2014, our laboratory employed hyper-CEST
to detect Bacillus
anthracis and Bacillus subtilis spores in
solution and interrogate the layers that comprise their structures.[51] Removal of the outermost spore layers in B. anthracis and B. subtilis (the exosporium
and coat, respectively) enhanced 129Xe exchange with the
spore interior and therefore increased the hyper-CEST saturation contrast.
The most Xe-accessible spore sample (strain AD142) was detected at
a concentration below 1 fM. Notably, the spores were invisible by
hp 129Xe NMR direct detection methods, highlighting the
lack of high-affinity xenon-binding sites, and the potential for extending
hyper-CEST NMR analysis to other biological and synthetic nanoporous
structures.
Cucurbit[6]uril Based Xenon-129 NMR Biosensors
Cryptophane-based xenon biosensors require multistep synthesis
and are isolated in low yield. New xenon-binding contrast agents have
recently expanded applications of hp 129Xe in chemical
sensing and imaging. Stevens et al. reported a perfluorocarbon nanoemulsion
contrast agent for 129Xe NMR, with each droplet encapsulating
multiple xenon atoms.[52] Nanoemulsions with
droplet diameters between 160 and 310 nm were detected at concentrations
as low as 100 fM, using hyper-CEST. Perfluorocarbon nanodroplets were
later shown to be internalized by cells and detected sensitively.[53]Our laboratory found that commercially
available cucurbit[6]uril
(CB[6]) with a cavity that is hydrophobic, rigidly open, and of similar
dimensions to Xe (diameter ∼4.3 Å), can promote rapid
Xe exchange interactions, as required for hyper-CEST.[54] The hp 129Xe NMR spectrum obtained with 5 mM
CB[6] using a direct detection method showed that the 129Xe–CB[6] peak in pH 7.2 PBS was 72 ppm upfield-shifted from
the 129Xe-water peak. Xe affinity determined for CB[6]
in PBS at 300 K was ∼40-fold lower than that measured previously
for TAAC.[18] However, the 129Xe–CB[6] exchange rate was ∼17-fold higher than previously
measured for 129Xe–TAAC (kexch = 86 s–1) at 300 K.[39] Ultrasensitive (1.8 pM) detection of CB[6] via hyper-CEST
was achieved by applying shaped RF saturation pulses at the chemical
shift of 129Xe in CB[6] and measuring the residual aqueous 129Xe signal after spin transfer as on-resonance CEST response.We sought to exploit the versatile host–guest chemistry
of CB[6] to develop a de novo “molecular relay”
that reports on specific proteins in solution.[55] CB[6]-based 129Xe NMR biosensors were programmed
for three sequential recognition events: a two-faced guest (TFG) initially
binds CB[6], the TFG is sequestered by cognate protein thereby freeing
CB[6], and last, xenon binds CB[6] for ultrasensitive detection by
hyper-CEST. The TFG is engineered to control this relay, such that
CB[6]–129Xe NMR signal is absent until addition
of analyte. In our initial study, we designed TFGs with a CAII-binding p-benzenesulfonamide moiety and CB[6]-binding butylamine
tail, while varying the length and chemical structure of the linker.
Upon addition of excess TFG to CB[6], the 129Xe–CB[6]
signal was greatly reduced as a result of less free CB[6] in solution.
Upon CAII addition, 129Xe–CB[6]hyper-CEST signal
was mostly restored, confirming that TFG was sequestered by CAII.
Cell studies highlighted the ability of the CB[6] detection scheme
to identify a specific protein target within a complex mixture (Figure ).
Figure 2
(top) Molecular relay
producing 129Xe NMR signal upon
analyte detection. (bottom) Frequency-dependent hyper-CEST spectra
showed CAII detection via CB[6] relay in bacterial lysate (OD600nm = 2) at 300 K. Reproduced with permission from ref (55). Copyright 2015 Wiley−VCH.
(top) Molecular relay
producing 129Xe NMR signal upon
analyte detection. (bottom) Frequency-dependent hyper-CEST spectra
showed CAII detection via CB[6] relay in bacterial lysate (OD600nm = 2) at 300 K. Reproduced with permission from ref (55). Copyright 2015 Wiley−VCH.CB[6] has gained attention for
its excellent hyper-CEST
response,
comparable to previously used cryptophane constructs.[56] For example, in 2015, Schröder et al. reported an
enzyme-sensing platform based on a competition between 129Xe and an enzyme product for binding to the CB[6] cavity.[57] And, the Pines group designed a CB[6]–rotaxane
platform where a cyclodextrin stopper prevents 129Xe from
accessing the CB[6] cavity until a specific cleavage event releases
CB[6] to produce a 129Xe@CB[6] signal.[58] Most recently, magnetic resonance images and a hyper-CEST
saturation map of CB[6] in whole bovine blood were reported.[59]Cryptophane-based xenon biosensing strategies
have mostly relied
on small chemical shift differences between target-bound and unbound
states, which requires high spectral resolution that can be challenging
in hyper-CEST mode. Thus, the turn-on strategies reported with CB[6]
offer advantages by suppressing the 129Xe@host signal until
the sensor reaches a region of interest or is selectively activated.
Genetically-Encoded Protein as a 129Xe NMR Reporter
There
has been long-standing interest in developing genetically
encoded MRI reporters that combine high-resolution, noninvasive MRI
with the power of molecular biology to visualize specific molecular
processes. However, previous efforts to develop such reporters for 1H MRI have been limited by low detection sensitivity.[60] This has motivated investigation of hyper-CEST
contrast agents, which can provide Xe-specific molecular details in
the context of an anatomical 1H MR image. In 2014, Shapiro
et al. reported the use of genetically encoded bacterial gas vesicles
(GVs) as ultrasensitive hyper-CEST contrast agents, detectable at
picomolar concentration.[61] This pioneering
example of a hyper-CEST reporter gene is translationally challenging
because GVs are very large (0.1–2 μm long) multimeric
protein assemblies from complex gene clusters and difficult to reconstitute
in many eukaryotic systems.Our lab has endeavored to develop
a genetically encoded single
protein as a hyper-CEST reporter.[62] We
initially considered TEM-1 β-lactamase (bla) based on its well-established
allosteric site whose size and hydrophobicity suggest it to be a good
target for Xe exchange. We observed two saturation responses in the
hyper-CEST z-spectrum for 80 μM bla: one free 129Xe in solution peak centered at 195 ppm, and a second peak centered
at 255 ppm that results from 129Xe–bla interaction.
Importantly, the unique 129Xe–bla peak cannot be
directly observed by hp 129Xe NMR spectroscopy even with
high-concentration (approximately millimolar) bla, due to the low
xenon-bound population and high rate of xenon exchange between different
sites. We carried out hyper-CEST measurements by varying saturation
time to determine the molecular sensitivity of bla and showed that
0.1 μM (2.9 μg/mL) bla was able to produce 23% ±
2% saturation contrast. The in vitro detection limit
of single protein bla is comparable to previously reported GVs in
terms of protein mass concentration[61] and
represents a roughly 100-fold improvement compared to 1H-CEST reporter genes.[63]We then
investigated the possibility of using bla as a genetically
encoded 129Xe NMR reporter. BL21(DE3) E. coli cells expressing recombinant wt-bla were induced with isopropyl-β-thiogalactopyranoside,
and hyper-CEST experiments showed a saturation contrast of 72% ±
3% for cells at OD600 of 9.2. By contrast, the on-resonance
and off-resonance curves were almost identical for the control E. coli sample at the same OD600. We also tested
whether bla can function in mammalian cells and found that 0.2 million/mL
transfected HEK cells producing the equivalent of 0.7 μM bla
in the cell suspension was sufficient to produce a saturation contrast
of 13% ± 1%, compared to minimal contrast observed for control
HEK cells (Figure ).
Figure 3
(top) Time-dependent saturation transfer data for induced E. coli (a) and noninduced E. coli (b).
(bottom) Time-dependent saturation transfer data for transfected (c)
and control (d) HEK293T/17 cells. Reproduced with permission from
ref (62). Copyright
2016 Wiley−VCH.
(top) Time-dependent saturation transfer data for induced E. coli (a) and noninduced E. coli (b).
(bottom) Time-dependent saturation transfer data for transfected (c)
and control (d) HEK293T/17 cells. Reproduced with permission from
ref (62). Copyright
2016 Wiley−VCH.This study highlights a potential use for hp 129Xe as
an ultrasensitive probe for studying allosteric pockets in proteins.
Moreover, bla has been well established as a fluorogenic reporter
for in vivo studies, which lends support to its development
as a hyper-CEST reporter for biomolecular imaging. Bla mutagenesis
should make it possible to increase Xe affinity at the primary site
and also shift the hyper-CEST response peak, either to achieve multiplexing
or to discriminate against 129Xe-mammalian cell background
signals.
Summary and Outlook
Further enhancement
of detection sensitivity will be important
in future applications but is somewhat context dependent. For example,
in the hyper-CEST scheme, higher Xe exchange rates confer faster saturation
transfer but also require more power for complete saturation and therefore
reduce selectivity. The parameters for continuous-wave (CW) saturation
were recently reported.[64] Moreover, to
achieve optimal sensitivity, saturation of the encapsulated xenon
should not perturb the bulk xenon pool, to ensure that biosensor-mediated
saturation can be discerned from the natural relaxation processes.
While saturation-transfer effects can be quantitatively predicted
from the Bloch equations,[65] specific information
that is not always known in advance is required, such as the inhomogeneous
contribution to line width. The sensitivity also depends on the initial 129Xe polarization level, rate and fluctuation of hp 129Xe delivery, and relaxation rate of hp 129Xe in the specific
environment.Translating in vitro experiments
to in
vivo imaging requires addressing additional issues such as
delivery of hp Xe and biosensors to local sites of interest, and RF
tissue heating during imaging. Previous study on the pharmacokinetics
of hp Xe estimated that the maximum concentration of Xe that can be
breathed is 80%,[66] and delivery of hp Xe
through inhalation has enabled pulmonary and cerebral MRI in both
animals and humans.[67] Hyperpolarized 129Xe can be delivered into the bloodstream by injection of
hp 129Xe dissolved in physiological solution. For hp 129Xe MR biosensing, the biosensors are administered to the
organism before the delivery of hp 129Xe. More work is
needed to determine the biocompatibility and biodistribution of CB[6],
cryptophane, and other xenon-binding biosensors. Promising structures
are zeolite nanoparticles, for which the localization and biodistribution
have been studied after injection into mice.[68] The high sensitivity of hyper-CEST experiments depends on highly
efficient saturation but is constrained by limits on specific absorption
rate (SAR) of the pulses for in vivo studies. It
has been shown that, compared with CW saturation, pulsed saturation
can achieve comparable saturation efficiency at lower power, thus
minimizing RF heating.[69] Recently, hyper-CEST
data with CB[6] in whole blood was reported using prepulse train with
a SAR of 0.025 W/kg, well below the FDA limit of 4 W/kg.[59]Importantly, 129Xe contrast
agents should be amenable
to multiplexed detection, due to the large 129Xe NMR chemical
shift window for xenon bound to different biosensors.[53] The ability to visualize several biomarkers simultaneously
will be particularly useful for disease diagnosis. Coupling hyper-CEST
with multiplexing will require additional optimization to maximize
molecular and spatial selectivity in different compartments. The continued
development of better hp xenon delivery methods and more targeted,
small-molecule and genetically encoded biosensors will help to expand
the scope of hp 129Xe MRI for molecular imaging.
Authors: M M Spence; S M Rubin; I E Dimitrov; E J Ruiz; D E Wemmer; A Pines; S Q Yao; F Tian; P G Schultz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-09-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Megan M Spence; E Janette Ruiz; Seth M Rubin; Thomas J Lowery; Nicolas Winssinger; Peter G Schultz; David E Wemmer; Alexander Pines Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2004-11-24 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Thomas J Lowery; Sandra Garcia; Lana Chavez; E Janette Ruiz; Tom Wu; Thierry Brotin; Jean-Pierre Dutasta; David S King; Peter G Schultz; Alex Pines; David E Wemmer Journal: Chembiochem Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.164
Authors: Mikhail G Shapiro; Tatjana Atanasijevic; Henryk Faas; Gil G Westmeyer; Alan Jasanoff Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Sandra Garcia; Lana Chavez; Thomas J Lowery; Song-I Han; David E Wemmer; Alexander Pines Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2006-10-13 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Justin L Mynar; Thomas J Lowery; David E Wemmer; Alexander Pines; Jean M J Fréchet Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2006-05-17 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Qian Wei; Garry K Seward; P Aru Hill; Brian Patton; Ivan E Dimitrov; Nicholas N Kuzma; Ivan J Dmochowski Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2006-10-11 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Katherine W Pulsipher; Joshua A Bulos; José A Villegas; Jeffery G Saven; Ivan J Dmochowski Journal: Protein Sci Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 6.725
Authors: Jason Graham Skinner; Luca Menichetti; Alessandra Flori; Anna Dost; Andreas Benjamin Schmidt; Markus Plaumann; Ferdia Aiden Gallagher; Jan-Bernd Hövener Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Joseph W Plummer; Kiarash Emami; Andrew Dummer; Jason C Woods; Laura L Walkup; Zackary I Cleveland Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2020-10-10 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Sarah H Klass; Ashley E Truxal; Tahoe A Fiala; Joseph Kelly; Dang Nguyen; Joel A Finbloom; David E Wemmer; Alexander Pines; Matthew B Francis Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Sourabh Shukla; He Hu; Hui Cai; Soo-Khim Chan; Christine E Boone; Veronique Beiss; Paul L Chariou; Nicole F Steinmetz Journal: Annu Rev Virol Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 10.431