| Literature DB >> 34587660 |
Ekaterina Laukhtina1,2, Victor M Schuettfort1,3, David D'Andrea1, Benjamin Pradere1, Keiichiro Mori1,4, Fahad Quhal1,5, Reza Sari Motlagh1,6, Hadi Mostafaei1,7, Satoshi Katayama1,8, Nico С Grossmann1,9, Pawel Rajwa1,10, Flora Zeinler1, Mohammad Abufaraj11, Marco Moschini12,13, Kristin Zimmermann14, Pierre I Karakiewicz15, Harun Fajkovic1,16, Douglas Scherr17, Eva Compérat1, Peter Nyirady18, Michael Rink3, Dmitry Enikeev2, Shahrokh F Shariat1,2,16,19,20,21,22.
Abstract
Elevated preoperative plasma level of endoglin has been associated with worse oncologic outcomes in various malignancies. The present large-scale study aimed to determine the predictive and prognostic values of preoperative endoglin with regard to clinicopathologic and survival outcomes in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for nonmetastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). We prospectively collected preoperative blood samples from 1036 consecutive patients treated with RC for UCB. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were undertaken to assess the correlation of endoglin levels with pathologic and survival outcomes, respectively. The AUC and C-index were used to assess the discrimination. Patients with adverse pathologic features had significantly higher median preoperative endoglin plasma levels than their counterparts. Higher preoperative endoglin level was independently associated with an increased risk for lymph node metastasis, ≥pT3 disease, and nonorgan confined disease (NOCD; all p < 0.001). Plasma endoglin level was also independently associated with cancer-specific and overall survival in both pre- and postoperative models (all p < 0.05), as well as with recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the preoperative model (p < 0.001). The addition of endoglin to the preoperative standard model improved its discrimination for prediction of lymph node metastasis, ≥pT3 disease, NOCD, and RFS (differential increases in C-indices: 10%, 5%, 5.8%, and 4%, respectively). Preoperative plasma endoglin is associated with features of biologically and clinically aggressive UCB as well as survival outcomes. Therefore, it seems to hold the potential of identifying UCB patients who may benefit from intensified therapy in addition to RC such as extended lymphadenectomy or/and preoperative systemic therapy.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; bladder cancer; endoglin; radical cystectomy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34587660 PMCID: PMC9293216 DOI: 10.1002/mc.23355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Carcinog ISSN: 0899-1987 Impact factor: 5.139
Association of median preoperative plasma level of endoglin with clinicopathologic characteristics in 1036 patients treated with radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder
| Variable | Median plasma endoglin level, ng/ml (IQR) | Stratified by median preoperative plasma level of endoglin | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall ( | 31.4 (20.0–39.2) |
|
Low ≥ 3.142 μg/ml ( |
High < 3.142 μg/ml ( |
| |
| Age | 67 (60, 73) | ‐ | ‐ | 67 (61, 73) | 66 (59, 72) | 0.2 |
| Gender | 0.71 | 0.8 | ||||
| Male | 814 (79%) | 31.4 (19.6–39.1) | 406 (79%) | 408 (78%) | ||
| Female | 222 (21%) | 31.5 (22.2–40.2) | 109 (21%) | 113 (22%) | ||
| Blood transfusion | 0.26 | >0.9 | ||||
| No | 768 (74%) | 31.5 (19.7–39.1) | 381 (74%) | 387 (74%) | ||
| Yes | 268 (26%) | 31.4 (20.4–39.9) | 134 (26%) | 134 (26%) | ||
| Thrombocytosis |
| 0.2 | ||||
| No | 923 (89%) | 31.2 (19.6–39.0) | 465 (90.3%) | 458 (88%) | ||
| Yes | 923 (89%) | 33.5 (23.7–41.7) | 50 (9.7%) | 63 (12%) | ||
| Hypoalbuminemia | 0.06 | 0.2 | ||||
| No | 891 (86%) | 31.1 (19.9–39.0) | 450 (87%) | 441 (85%) | ||
| Yes | 145 (14%) | 33.9 (21.8–40.0) | 65 (13%) | 80 (15%) | ||
| Clinical tumor grade | >0.9 | |||||
| G2 | 6 (0.6%) | 3 (0.6%) | 3 (0.6%) | |||
| G3 | 1022 (99%) | ‐ | ‐ | 510 (99%) | 512 (99%) | |
| Unknown | 8 | 2 | 6 | |||
| Clinical tumor stage |
|
| ||||
| cTa | 23 (2.2%) | 31.7 (13.3–39.6) | 11 (2.1%) | 12 (2.3%) | ||
| cTis | 105 (10%) | 29.2 (19.4–39.1) | 54 (11%) | 51 (9.9%) | ||
| cT1 | 336 (33%) | 29.9 (20.2–37.9) | 184 (36%) | 152 (29%) | ||
| cT2 | 498 (48%) | 32.7 (19.5–39.7) | 233 (45%) | 265 (51%) | ||
| cT3 | 38 (3.7%) | 37.3 (30.2–43.4) | 11 (2.1%) | 27 (5.2%) | ||
| cT4 | 29 (2.8%) | 23.5 (21.0–40.1) | 20 (3.9%) | 9 (1.7%) | ||
| Unknown | 7 | 40.4 (27.1–47.7) | 2 | 5 | ||
| Pathological tumor grade | 0.05 | 0.2 | ||||
| G1 | 62 (6.0%) | 35.3 (24.1–41.5) | 25 (4.9%) | 37 (7.1%) | ||
| G2 | 11 (1.1%) | 19.4 (13.9–38.5) | 7 (1.4%) | 4 (0.8%) | ||
| G3 | 963 (93%) | 31.3 (19.6–39.1) | 483 (94%) | 480 (92%) | ||
| Pathological tumor stage |
|
| ||||
| pT0 | 62 (6.0%) | 35.3 (24.1–41.5) | 25 (4.9%) | 37 (7.1%) | ||
| pTa | 22 (2.1%) | 43.1 (14.1–48.6) | 9 (1.7%) | 13 (2.5%) | ||
| pTis | 131 (13%) | 24.6 (11.1–36.9) | 72 (14%) | 59 (11%) | ||
| pT1 | 162 (16%) | 27.1 (12.7–37.4) | 96 (19%) | 66 (13%) | ||
| pT2 | 248 (24%) | 27.3 (17.7–36.3) | 164 (32%) | 84 (16%) | ||
| pT3 | 281 (27%) | 33.3 (26.0–39.1) | 103 (20%) | 178 (34%) | ||
| pT4 | 130 (13%) | 38.6 (23.2–46.1) | 46 (8.9%) | 84 (16%) | ||
| Positive soft tissue surgical margins |
|
| ||||
| No | 941 (91%) | 30.8 (19.3–38.8) | 483 (93.8%) | 458 (88%) | ||
| Yes | 95 (9.2%) | 35.6 (25.7–43.7) | 32 (6.2%) | 63 (12%) | ||
| Lymphovascular invasion |
|
| ||||
| No | 741 (72%) | 30.1 (18.0–39.0) | 389 (76%) | 352 (58%) | ||
| Yes | 295 (28%) | 33.3 (23.7–40.4) | 126 (24%) | 169 (32%) | ||
| Concomitant CIS |
| 0.5 | ||||
| No | 464 (45%) | 32.0 (22.2–39.8) | 225 (44%) | 239 (46%) | ||
| Yes | 572 (55%) | 31.1 (18.0–39.1) | 290 (56%) | 282 (54%) | ||
| Lymph node involvement |
|
| ||||
| No | 773 (75%) | 27.3 (16.6–38.5) | 439 (85%) | 334 (64%) | ||
| Yes | 263 (25%) | 34.9 (30.2–41.6) | 76 (15%) | 187 (36%) | ||
| Adjuvant chemotherapy |
|
| ||||
| No | 869 (84%) | 30.5 (18.9–39.1) | 447 (87%) | 422 (81%) | ||
| Yes | 167 (16%) | 33.3 (26.5–40.6) | 68 (13%) | 99 (19%) | ||
Note: Median (IQR); n (%). Bold p values are statistically significant.
Multivariable logistic regression models for the prediction of lymph node metastasis, ≥pT3 disease, and any nonorgan confined disease in 1029 patients treated with radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder
| Variable | Lymph node involvement | ≥pT3 disease | Any nonorgan confined disease | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI |
| OR | 95% CI |
| OR | 95% CI |
| |
| Endoglin | 1.72 | 1.52, 1.97 |
| 1.53 | 1.37, 1.72 |
| 1.61 | 1.44, 1.81 |
|
| Age | 1.00 | 0.98, 1.01 | 0.9 | 1.03 | 1.01, 1.04 |
| 1.02 | 1.01, 1.04 |
|
| Gender (female) | 1.40 | 0.98, 1.99 | 0.06 | 1.02 | 0.73, 1.42 | 0.9 | 1.14 | 0.82, 1.59 | 0.4 |
| Clinical tumor stage | |||||||||
| cTa/cTis/cT1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| cT2 | 2.38 | 1.72, 3.30 |
| 2.64 | 1.99, 3.51 |
| 2.96 | 2.25, 3.91 |
|
| ≥cT3 | 3.13 | 1.74, 5.55 |
| 8.83 | 4.89, 16.7 |
| 8.25 | 4.44, 16.2 |
|
| AUC with endoglin | 0.733 | 0.725 | 0.734 | ||||||
| AUC without endoglin | 0.629 | 0.675 | 0.676 | ||||||
| DeLong's test |
|
|
| ||||||
Note: Bold p values are statistically significant.
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. CI, confidence interval.
Figure 1Decision curve analyses (DCA) for the evaluation of the clinical net‐benefit using the log models for the prediction of (A) lymph node metastasis, (B) ≥ pT3 disease, and (C) any nonorgan confined disease
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier analysis for (A) recurrence‐free survival (RFS), (B) cancer‐specific survival (CSS), and (C) overall survival (OS) in 1036 patients treated with radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, stratified according to preoperative plasma level of endoglin at a cut‐off of 3.142 [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Separate pre‐ and postoperative multivariable Cox regression models for the prediction of recurrence‐free survival, cancer‐specific survival, and overall survival in 1036 patients treated with radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder
| Variable | Recurrence‐free survival | Cancer‐specific survival | Overall survival | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI |
| HR | 95% CI |
| HR | 95% CI |
| |
|
| |||||||||
| Endoglin | 1.28 | 1.18, 1.39 |
| 1.33 | 1.22, 1.45 |
| 1.21 | 1.14, 1.29 |
|
| Age | 1.02 | 1.01, 1.03 |
| 1.02 | 1.01, 1.04 |
| 1.05 | 1.04, 1.06 |
|
| Gender (female) | 1.48 | 1.15, 1.89 |
| 1.59 | 1.23, 2.05 |
| 1.30 | 1.07, 1.58 |
|
| Clinical tumor stage | |||||||||
| cTa/cTis/cT1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| cT2 | 1.66 | 1.32, 2.10 |
| 1.77 | 1.38, 2.27 |
| 1.59 | 1.33, 1.90 |
|
| ≥cT3 | 1.97 | 1.31, 2.96 |
| 2.23 | 1.47, 3.40 |
| 1.88 | 1.37, 2.59 |
|
| C‐index with endoglin | 0.645 | 0.678 | 0.663 | ||||||
| C‐index without endoglin | 0.605 | 0.632 | 0.636 | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Endoglin | 1.09 | 0.99, 1.20 | 0.06 | 1.13 | 1.02, 1.24 |
| 1.11 | 1.04, 1.19 |
|
| Age | 1.01 | 1.00, 1.02 | 0.09 | 1.02 | 1.00, 1.03 |
| 1.04 | 1.03, 1.05 |
|
| Gender (female) | 1.53 | 1.19, 1.96 |
| 1.59 | 1.23, 2.06 |
| 1.35 | 1.11, 1.64 |
|
| Pathological stage | |||||||||
| pT0/pTa/pTis/pT1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| pT2 | 1.51 | 1.04, 2.18 |
| 1.47 | 0.99, 2.18 | 0.05 | 1.39 | 1.09, 1.77 |
|
| ≥pT3 | 3.11 | 2.19, 4.40 |
| 2.99 | 2.06, 4.32 |
| 2.43 | 1.90, 3.11 |
|
| Positive soft tissue surgical margins | 1.35 | 0.99, 1.85 | 0.06 | 1.42 | 1.02, 1.96 |
| 1.05 | 0.79, 1.39 | 0.7 |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 1.43 | 1.11, 1.83 |
| 1.58 | 1.22, 2.05 |
| 1.24 | 1.01, 1.51 |
|
| Concomitant CIS | 1.03 | 0.83, 1.29 | 0.8 | 0.94 | 0.74, 1.19 | 0.6 | 1.01 | 0.85, 1.20 | 0.9 |
| Lymph node involvement | 2.36 | 1.81, 3.06 |
| 2.41 | 1.84, 3.16 |
| 1.97 | 1.59, 2.43 |
|
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.91 | 0.70, 1.20 | 0.5 | 0.97 | 0.73, 1.28 | 0.8 | 0.85 | 0.68, 1.08 | 0.2 |
| C‐index with endoglin | 0.751 | 0.777 | 0.734 | ||||||
| C‐index without endoglin | 0.754 | 0.778 | 0.733 | ||||||
Note: Bold p values are statistically significant.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CIS, carcinoma in situ; HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 3Decision curve analyses (DCA) for the evaluation of the clinical net‐benefit using the preoperative Cox models for the prediction of (A) recurrence‐free survival (RFS), (B) cancer‐specific survival (CSS), and (C) overall survival (OS) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 4Decision curve analyses (DCA) for the evaluation of the clinical net‐benefit using the postoperative Cox models for the prediction of (A) recurrence‐free survival (RFS), (B) cancer‐specific survival (CSS), and (C) overall survival (OS)