| Literature DB >> 35411143 |
Hongyang Qian1, Yiqiu Wang1, Zehua Ma1, Lei Qian1, Xiaoguang Shao1, Di Jin1, Ming Cao1, Shupeng Liu2, Haige Chen1, Jiahua Pan1, Wei Xue1.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the value of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy analysis of pretreated plasma samples in prediction of bladder cancer (BCa) recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and radical cystectomy (RC). Patients andEntities:
Keywords: Raman spectroscopy; bladder cancer; cancer recurrence; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; radical cystectomy
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35411143 PMCID: PMC8994599 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S354590
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Figure 1The transmission electron microscope (TEM) of Ag nanoparticles.
Demographics and Clinical Features of the Cohort
| Clinical Variables | Total | Recurrent Patients | Non-Recurrent Patients | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case No. (%) | 88 | 44 (50.0) | 44 (50.0) | |
| Age (IQR), years | 61.5 (58–66) | 62 (57.5–66) | 61 (58–66) | 0.818 |
| Gender | 0.778 | |||
| Female | 15 (17.0) | 8 (18.2) | 7 (15.9) | |
| Male | 73 (83.0) | 36 (81.8) | 37 (84.1) | |
| Clinical stage, No.(%) | 0.263 | |||
| T2N0M0 | 73 (83.0) | 34 (77.3) | 39 (88.6) | |
| T3N0M0 | 10 (11.4) | 6 (13.6) | 4 (9.1) | |
| T4aN0M0 | 5 (5.7) | 4 (9.1) | 1 (2.3) | |
| Pathological T stage, No.(%) | <0.001 | |||
| T0 | 18 (20.5) | 2 (4.5) | 16 (36.4) | |
| Tis | 4 (4.5) | 2 (4.5) | 2 (4.5) | |
| Ta-1 | 26 (29.5) | 7 (15.9) | 19 (43.2) | |
| T2 | 14 (14.9) | 10 (22.7) | 4 (7.8) | |
| T3 | 17 (19.3) | 17 (38.6) | 0 (0) | |
| T4 | 9 (10.2) | 6 (13.6) | 3 (6.8) | |
| Pathological N stage No.(%) | 0.009 | |||
| N0 | 79 (89.8) | 36 (81.8) | 43 (97.7) | |
| N1 | 9 (10.2) | 8 (18.2) | 1 (2.3) | |
| Pathological downstaging | <0.001 | |||
| Yes | 50 (58.4) | 13 (29.5) | 37 (84.1) | |
| No | 38 (41.6) | 31 (70.5) | 7 (15.9) |
Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.
Figure 2Mean SERS spectra of the recurrent group and non-recurrent group.
Tentative Assignments of Significant SERS Shifts in Biological Samples24–27
| Raman Shift (cm−1) | Major Assignment |
|---|---|
| 638 | C-C twisting mode/tyrosine |
| 725 | Hypoxanthine |
| 890 | δ(C−O−H)/Amino galactose |
| 1095 | Deoxyribonucleic acid, phosphodioxy group |
| 1135 | C-N stretch/D-mannose |
| 1328 | Nucleic acids and phosphates |
| 1455 | Deoxyribose |
| 1558 | Tryptophan |
| 1583 | C=C bending mode/phenylalanine |
| 1655 | Amide I/C=C lipid stretch |
Abbreviation: SERS, Surface-enhanced Raman Spectroscopy.
Cox Regression Proportional Hazard Analysis of Clinical Variables and SERS Shifts
| Unadjusted | Adjusted | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | HR | (95% CI) | P | HR | (95% CI) | P |
| Pathological T stage | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||
| T0 | Ref. | / | / | Ref. | / | / |
| Tis | 7.15 | 1.00–51.37 | 0.051 | 11.69 | 1.59–85.93 | 0.016 |
| Ta-1 | 2.87 | 0.59–13.91 | 0.191 | 2.06 | 0.41–10.22 | 0.378 |
| T2 | 12.60 | 2.71–58.64 | 0.001 | 114.66 | 13.68–961.21 | <0.001 |
| T3 | 23.19 | 5.29–101.63 | <0.001 | 370.25 | 35.85–3823.68 | <0.001 |
| T4 | 12.05 | 2.41–60.17 | 0.002 | 228.56 | 20.98–2489.71 | <0.001 |
| Pathological N stage | / | / | / | |||
| N0 | Ref. | / | / | |||
| N1 | 3.06 | 1.40–6.70 | 0.005 | |||
| Pathological downstaging | 0.182 | 0.09–0.35 | <0.001 | 0.055 | 0.01–0.32 | 0.001 |
| Peak 638 cm−1 | 0.23 | 0.04–1.28 | 0.093 | / | / | / |
| Peak 725 cm−1 | 8.55 | 3.20–22.90 | <0.001 | / | / | / |
| Peak 1095 cm−1 | 715.45 | 36.35–14,082.31 | <0.001 | / | / | / |
| Peak 1135 cm−1 | 0.06 | 0.01–0.41 | 0.005 | / | / | / |
| Peak 1328 cm−1 | 71.58 | 7.79–657.93 | <0.001 | / | / | / |
| Peak 1455 cm−1 | 102.91 | 9.20–1151.23 | <0.001 | / | / | / |
| Peak 1558 cm−1 | 0.035 | 0.009–0.14 | <0.001 | 0.018 | 0.003–0.11 | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: CI, Confidence Interval; HR, Hazard Ratio; Ref., Reference; SERS, Surface-enhanced Raman Spectroscopy.
Figure 3Distribution of significant SERS peaks’ intensities for recurrent group and non-recurrent group. Bar graph shows the mean spectral intensities at each peak. Scatter diagram shows mean intensities of each sample in specific peaks, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001; Error bar indicates standard error of the mean (S.E.M.).
Figure 4The Kaplan–Meier curve for recurrent patients and non-recurrent patients divided by SERS peak 1558 cm−1.
Figure 5Scatter plot of linear discriminant (LDA) scores for recurrent group and non-recurrent group.
The PCA-LDA Model of Recurrent and Non-Recurrent Groups Based on the Raman Spectra of Plasma with Leave-One-Spectrum-Out Cross-Validation
| Group | Predicted Group | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-recurrent (%) | 37 (84.1) | 7 (15.9) | 44 (100) |
| Recurrent (%) | 7 (15.9) | 37 (84.1) | 44 (100) |
Abbreviations: PCA, principal component analysis; LDA, linear discriminant analysis.
Figure 6The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the PCA-LDA model, clinical variables of pathological tumor stage, lymph node metastasis and pathological downstaging, and clinical variables combined with Raman peaks of 1558 cm−1.