| Literature DB >> 34568492 |
Xingning Xiao1, Biao Tang1, Siyi Liu2, Yujuan Suo3, Hua Yang1, Wen Wang1.
Abstract
Disease caused by antibiotic-resistant Salmonella is a serious clinical problem that poses a great threat to public health. The present study is aimed at assessing differences in bacterial kinetics with different antibiotic resistance profiles under environmental stress and at developing microbial tolerance models in lettuce during storage from 4 to 36°C. The drug-resistance phenotypes of 10 Salmonella Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) isolates were examined using the broth microdilution method. The results of 10 S. Typhimurium isolates in the suspensions showed that a slow trend towards reduction of drug-sensitive (DS) isolates in relation to the others though without statistical difference. Compared to DS S. Typhimurium SA62, greater bacterial reduction was observed in multidrug-resistant (MDR) S. Typhimurium HZC3 during lettuce storage at 4°C (P < 0.05). It was likely that a cross-response between antibiotic resistance and food-associated stress tolerance. The greater growth in lettuce at 12°C was observed for DS S. Typhimurium SA62 compared to MDR S. Typhimurium HZC3 and was even statistically different (P < 0.05), while no significant difference was observed for bacterial growth between MDR S. Typhimurium HZC3 and DS S. Typhimurium SA62 strains in lettuce storage from 16 to 36°C (P > 0.05). The goodness-of-fit indices indicated the Log-linear primary model provided a satisfactory fit to describe the MDR S. Typhimurium HZC3 and DS S. Typhimurium SA62 survival at 4°C. A square root secondary model could be used to describe the effect of temperature (12, 16, 28, and 36°C) on the growth rates of S. Typhimurium HZC3 (adj - R 2 = 0.91, RMSE = 0.06) and S. Typhimurium SA62 (adj - R 2 = 0.99, RMSE = 0.01) derived from the Huang primary model. It was necessary to pay attention to the tolerance of antibiotic resistant bacteria under environmental stress, and the generated models could provide parts of the input data for microbial risk assessment of Salmonella with different antibiotic resistance profile in lettuce.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34568492 PMCID: PMC8457946 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5604458
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Antibiotic resistance phenotype of Salmonella isolates.
| Isolation | Phenotypic antibiotic resistance | Number of resistant antibiotics | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| SA62 | — | 0 | DSa |
| Z62 | — | 0 | |
|
| |||
| Z95 | TET | 1 | DRb |
| Z9 | CIP--FFC | 2 | |
| X79 | AMC--FFC | 2 | |
| Z27 | CIP--TET | 2 | |
|
| |||
| X63 | CS--T/S--TET--FFC | 4 | MDRc |
| HZC3 | AMP--AMC--CIP--TET--FFC | 5 | |
| X54 | AMP--MEM--GEN--CEF--T/S--TET--FFC | 7 | |
| X100 | AMP--AMC--CTX--GEN--CIP--T/S--TET--FFC | 8 | |
aDS: bacterial sensitive to all 13 antibiotics, including ampicillin (AMP), amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC), cefotaxime (CTX), meropenem (MEM), amikacin (AMK), gentamicin (GEN), colistin (CS), ceftiofur (CEF), ciprofloxacin (CIP), sulfamethoxazole (T/S), tetracycline (TET), tigecycline (TIG), and florfenicol (FFC), was DS bacteria. bDR: bacteria resistant to one or two antibiotics were called DR bacteria. cMDR: multidrug resistance was defined as resistance to at least three antibiotics.
Figure 1Logarithmic reduction or growth of 10 isolates of S. Typhimurium in the suspensions after exposure to storage temperatures at (a) 4°C, (b) 12°C, (c) 24°C, and (d) 36°C for 96 h; hot water temperatures at (e) 60°C and (f) 75°C for 2 min; NaClO concentrations at (g) 100 mg/L and (h) 200 mg/L for 10 min. DS: drug-sensitive; DR: drug-resistant; MDR: multidrug-resistant. Uppercase letters represent the results of significant difference analysis with different isolates. Where an uppercase letter is not shown, no statistical difference between all the data is analyzed.
Figure 2Bacterial survival and growth of MDR S. Typhimurium HZC3 and DS S. Typhimurium SA62 in lettuce during storage at (a) 4°C, (b) 12°C, (c) 16°C, (d) 28°C, and (e) 36°C. The asterisk (∗) represents significant differences between the two isolates at the same incubation time and temperature. Uppercase letters represent significant differences for the same isolate at the same temperature during the incubation times.
Figure 3Log-linear and Huang models fitting the survival and growth of MDR S. Typhimurium HZC3 and DS S. Typhimurium SA62 in lettuce storage: (a) HZC3 at 4°C; (b) HZC3 at 12, 16, 28, and 36°C; (c) SA62 at 4°C; (d) SA62 at 12, 16, 28, and 36°C.
Parameter estimates and statistical analysis of the Log-linear model fitted to MDR S. Typhimurium HZC3 and DS S. Typhimurium SA62 survival curves at 4°C.
| Strain | log |
| AIC | RMSE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HZC3 | 3.48 | 102.84 | 0.92 | -38.03 | 0.15 |
| SA62 | 3.46 | 131.27 | 0.95 | -35.84 | 0.17 |
log N0: the initial bacterial population in lettuce (CFU/cm2); D: the decimal reduction time (h) at a specific treatment temperature; adj − R2: the correlation coefficient; AIC: Akaike information criterion; RMSE: the root mean square error.
Parameter estimates and statistical analysis of the Modified Gompertz, Huang, Logistic, and Baranyi models fitted to MDR S. Typhimurium HZC3 and DS S. Typhimurium SA62 growth curves at 12, 16, 28, and 36°C.
| Model | Strain | Temperature (°C) | log | log | AIC | RMSE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modified Gompertz | HZC3 | 12 | 3.43 | 14.27 | 0.07 | 4.65 | 0.82 | -22.19 | 0.26 |
| 16 | 3.08 | 4.12 | 0.31 | 7.01 | 0.98 | -30.17 | 0.22 | ||
| 28 | 2.93 | 0.00 | 0.47 | 7.22 | 0.96 | -34.54 | 0.29 | ||
| 36 | 2.61 | 0.10 | 0.83 | 7.00 | 0.97 | -39.07 | 0.24 | ||
| SA62 | 12 | 3.30 | 11.81 | 0.47 | 4.90 | 0.70 | 19.40 | 0.39 | |
| 16 | 3.14 | 4.71 | 0.27 | 6.62 | 0.96 | 31.21 | 0.27 | ||
| 28 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 0.57 | 7.36 | 0.99 | -47.47 | 0.14 | ||
| 36 | 2.56 | 0.00 | 0.47 | 7.52 | 0.89 | 36.21 | 0.34 | ||
|
| |||||||||
| Huang | HZC3 | 12 | 3.41 | 12.32 | 0.10 | 4.66 | 0.84 | -23.10 | 0.25 |
| 16 | 3.15 | 3.66 | 0.25 | 7.00 | 0.97 | -28.15 | 0.24 | ||
| 28 | 3.04 | 0.00 | 0.39 | 7.19 | 0.95 | -26.16 | 0.33 | ||
| 36 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 6.98 | 0.97 | -36.24 | 0.24 | ||
| SA62 | 12 | 3.28 | 6.11 | 0.18 | 4.94 | 0.88 | 20.21 | 0.43 | |
| 16 | 3.19 | 4.21 | 0.23 | 6.63 | 0.96 | 31.20 | 0.27 | ||
| 28 | 3.01 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 7.33 | 0.99 | -41.86 | 0.17 | ||
| 36 | 2.56 | 0.00 | 0.76 | 7.31 | 0.92 | -17.38 | 0.42 | ||
|
| |||||||||
| Logistic | HZC3 | 12 | 3.43 | 24.63 | 0.21 | 4.66 | 0.82 | -31.81 | 0.26 |
| 16 | 3.14 | 11.64 | 0.25 | 7.05 | 0.98 | -35.86 | 0.21 | ||
| 28 | 2.89 | 5.25 | 0.63 | 7.48 | 0.98 | -39.12 | 0.21 | ||
| 36 | 2.62 | 3.11 | 0.55 | 7.18 | 0.98 | -38.57 | 0.23 | ||
| SA62 | 12 | 3.30 | 34.06 | 0.17 | 5.93 | 0.67 | -20.35 | 0.41 | |
| 16 | 2.87 | 11.47 | 0.37 | 6.70 | 0.95 | -32.94 | 0.26 | ||
| 28 | 3.28 | 5.39 | 0.43 | 7.45 | 0.99 | -61.42 | 0.11 | ||
| 36 | 3.30 | 1.17 | 0.90 | 7.91 | 0.91 | -31.43 | 0.30 | ||
|
| |||||||||
| Baranyi | HZC3 | 12 | 3.56 | -0.91 | 0.10 | 4.72 | 0.76 | -21.95 | 0.30 |
| 16 | 3.14 | -1.62 | 0.32 | 6.97 | 0.97 | -26.34 | 0.24 | ||
| 28 | 3.07 | 13.74 | 0.39 | 7.19 | 0.95 | -25.29 | 0.33 | ||
| 36 | 2.61 | 67.54 | 0.69 | 6.98 | 0.97 | -9.28 | 0.24 | ||
| SA62 | 12 | 3.14 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 4.94 | 0.64 | 19.91 | 0.43 | |
| 16 | 2.22 | 4.58 | 0.23 | 6.62 | 0.95 | 31.18 | 0.28 | ||
| 28 | 2.84 | 6.14 | 0.47 | 7.33 | 0.98 | -41.30 | 0.18 | ||
| 36 | 4.45 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 7.46 | 0.86 | 32.34 | 0.38 | ||
λ: the lag time (h); h0: the physiological state of the microorganism; μmax: the maximum specific growth rate (log CFU/cm2/h); log Nmax: maximum bacterial populations (CFU/cm2/h).
Figure 4Square root model of the maximum growth rates of MDR S. Typhimurium HZC3 and DS S. Typhimurium SA62 in lettuce at different storage temperatures. μ values were obtained from the Huang model at each temperature.
A and B values used for the predictive models of MDR S. Typhimurium HZC3 and DS S. Typhimurium SA62.
| Temperature (°C) | Model | Strain |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Log-linear | HZC3 | 1.85 | 1.85 |
| SA62 | 1.87 | 1.87 | ||
|
| ||||
| 12, 16, 28, 36 | Square root | HZC3 | 1.39 | 1.39 |
| SA62 | 1.15 | 1.15 | ||
A: accuracy factor; B: bias factor.