Haley Meyer1, Syed I Khalid1,2, Amir H Dorafshar3, Richard W Byrne4. 1. Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago Medical School, North Chicago, IL, USA. 2. Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cranioplasty (CP) is associated with high complication rates compared to other common neurosurgical procedures. Several graft materials are used for CP, which may contribute to the high complication rates, but data in the literature regarding the influence of graft material on post-CP outcomes are inconsistent making it difficult to determine if, when, and to what extent the graft material impacts the rate of perioperative complications. There is an increased demand to identify and develop superior graft materials. OBJECTIVE: To review and compare the indications, risks, complications, and patient results associated with the use of different graft materials for cranial reconstructions. DESIGN: A search through EBSCOhost was conducted using the keywords "craniectomy" or "decompressive craniectomy," "cranioplasty," and "materials." The search was limited to literature published in the English language from 2005 until the present. Ultimately, 69 articles were included in this review. Due to the heterogeneity of the study populations, results, statistical analyses, and collecting methods, no statistical analyses could be performed. CONCLUSIONS: Several graft materials have been adapted for use in cranial reconstructions with inconsistent results making it unclear if or when one material may be indicated over others. Advances in computer-aided design have led to improved patient-specific implants, but the ideal graft material is still being sought after in ongoing research efforts. Reviewing materials currently available, as well as those in clinical trials, is important to identify the limitations associated with different implants and to guide future research.
BACKGROUND: Cranioplasty (CP) is associated with high complication rates compared to other common neurosurgical procedures. Several graft materials are used for CP, which may contribute to the high complication rates, but data in the literature regarding the influence of graft material on post-CP outcomes are inconsistent making it difficult to determine if, when, and to what extent the graft material impacts the rate of perioperative complications. There is an increased demand to identify and develop superior graft materials. OBJECTIVE: To review and compare the indications, risks, complications, and patient results associated with the use of different graft materials for cranial reconstructions. DESIGN: A search through EBSCOhost was conducted using the keywords "craniectomy" or "decompressive craniectomy," "cranioplasty," and "materials." The search was limited to literature published in the English language from 2005 until the present. Ultimately, 69 articles were included in this review. Due to the heterogeneity of the study populations, results, statistical analyses, and collecting methods, no statistical analyses could be performed. CONCLUSIONS: Several graft materials have been adapted for use in cranial reconstructions with inconsistent results making it unclear if or when one material may be indicated over others. Advances in computer-aided design have led to improved patient-specific implants, but the ideal graft material is still being sought after in ongoing research efforts. Reviewing materials currently available, as well as those in clinical trials, is important to identify the limitations associated with different implants and to guide future research.
Authors: Ryan P Morton; I Josh Abecassis; Josiah F Hanson; Jason Barber; John D Nerva; Samuel N Emerson; Chibawanye I Ene; Michelle M Chowdhary; Michael R Levitt; Andrew L Ko; Timothy H Dellit; Randall M Chesnut Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Brian P Walcott; Churl-Su Kwon; Sameer A Sheth; Corey R Fehnel; Robert M Koffie; Wael F Asaad; Brian V Nahed; Jean-Valery Coumans Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Angelos G Kolias; Hadie Adams; Ivan Timofeev; Marek Czosnyka; Elizabeth A Corteen; John D Pickard; Carole Turner; Barbara A Gregson; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Gordon D Murray; David K Menon; Peter J Hutchinson Journal: Br J Neurosurg Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 1.596