Literature DB >> 24684331

Materials used in cranioplasty: a history and analysis.

Aatman M Shah1, Henry Jung, Stephen Skirboll.   

Abstract

Cranioplasty, one of the oldest surgical procedures used to repair cranial defects, has undergone many revolutions over time to find the ideal material to improve patient prognosis. Cranioplasty offers cosmetic and protective benefits for patients with cranial defects. The first primitive cranioplasty procedures date back to 7000 bc and used metal and gourds to repair cranial defects. Cranioplasty was first documented by Fallopius who described repair using gold plates; the first bone graft was documented by van Meekeren. The first significant improvement for this procedure began with experimentation involving bone grafts in the late 19th century as a more natural approach for repairing cranial defects. The next impetus for advancement came because of wartime injuries incurred during World Wars I and II and involved experimentation with synthetic materials to counter the common complications associated with bone grafts. Methyl methacrylate, hydroxyapatite, ceramics, and polyetheretherketone implants among other materials have since been researched and used. Research now has shifted toward molecular biology to improve the ability of the patient to regenerate bone using bone growth factors. This paper reviews the evolution of materials used over time in addition to the various advantages and pitfalls associated with each change. It is important for neurosurgeons to be mindful of how these techniques have evolved in order to gain a better understanding of this procedure and how it has been adapted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24684331     DOI: 10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS13561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  52 in total

Review 1.  Complications Associated with Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David B Kurland; Ariana Khaladj-Ghom; Jesse A Stokum; Brianna Carusillo; Jason K Karimy; Volodymyr Gerzanich; Juan Sahuquillo; J Marc Simard
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Deformation of cranioplasty titanium mesh in a paediatric patient following head trauma.

Authors:  Basel Sharaf; Malke Asaad; Joseph Banuelos; Jesse Meaike
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-06-11

Review 3.  Problems of reconstructive cranioplasty after traumatic brain injury in children.

Authors:  Paolo Frassanito; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Luca Massimi; Simone Peraio; Massimo Caldarelli; Concezio Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 4.  Calvarial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Arvind Badhey; Sameep Kadakia; Moustafa Mourad; Jared Inman; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Hydroxyapatite ceramic implants for cranioplasty in children: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Laura Zaccaria; Sasha Job Tharakan; Stefan Altermatt
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  There are No Differences between Factors Determining Graft Infection in Autologous Bone Flap Replacement and Acrylic Cranioplasty: A Prospective Observational Study at Hospital Kuala Lumpur.

Authors:  Siti Azleen Mohamad; Mohd Safari Mohd Haspani; Badrisyah Idris
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-05

7.  Designing Biomaterials for 3D Printing.

Authors:  Murat Guvendiren; Joseph Molde; Rosane M D Soares; Joachim Kohn
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-04-13

8.  Shape memory polymer (SMP) scaffolds with improved self-fitting properties.

Authors:  Michaela R Pfau; Kelly G McKinzey; Abigail A Roth; Lance M Graul; Duncan J Maitland; Melissa A Grunlan
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 9.  State-of-Art of Standard and Innovative Materials Used in Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Valentina Siracusa; Giuseppe Maimone; Vincenzo Antonelli
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.329

10.  Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Cranioplasty Implants.

Authors:  Adam Binhammer; Josie Jakubowski; Oleh Antonyshyn; Paul Binhammer
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 0.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.