Literature DB >> 24043415

Analysis of the factors affecting graft infection after cranioplasty.

Hoon Kim1, Seng Oun Sung, Sung Jun Kim, Seong-Rim Kim, Ik-Seong Park, Kwang Wook Jo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The predictors of graft infection after cranioplasty (GIC) following decompressive craniectomy are not well established. Knowledge of the risk factors for GIC will allow development of preventive measures designed to reduce infection rates. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of GIC.
METHODS: A total of 85 patients underwent reconstructive cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy between January 2009 and July 2011 and had a follow-up period of > 1 year; charts were reviewed retrospectively. Although autograft was used whenever possible, artificial bone was used for cranioplasty. GIC was defined as infection requiring removal of the bone graft.
RESULTS: GIC occurred in six patients (7.05 %). GIC was not related to the indications for craniectomy, the interval of cranioplasty, graft material, or the size of the bone defect (p = 0.433, p = 0.206, p = 0.665, and p = 0.999, respectively). The GIC rate was significantly related to previous temporalis muscle resection, preoperative subgaleal fluid collection, operative times > 120 min, and postoperative wound disruptions (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.035, and p = 0.016, respectively). Multiple logistic regression showed that the presence of a subgaleal fluid collection before cranioplasty significantly increased the risk of GIC (OR: 38.53; 95 % CI: 2.77-535.6; p = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that long operative times (> 120 min), craniectomy with temporalis muscle resection, the presence of preoperative subgaleal fluid collection, and postoperative wound disruption may be risk factors for graft infection after cranioplasty. Surgical techniques should be developed to reduce operative time and to avoid temporalis muscle resection when possible. In addition, meticulous dural closure aimed at reducing the formation of subgaleal fluid collection is important for the prevention of graft infections after cranioplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24043415     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-013-1877-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  13 in total

Review 1.  The Recent Revolution in the Design and Manufacture of Cranial Implants: Modern Advancements and Future Directions.

Authors:  David J Bonda; Sunil Manjila; Warren R Selman; David Dean
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Efficacy and Versatility of the 3-D Titanium Mesh Implant in the Closure of Large Post-Craniectomy Osseous Defects, and its Therapeutic Role in Reversing the Syndrome of the Trephined: Clinical Study of a Case Series and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Priya Jeyaraj
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-05-26

3.  Risk factors for surgical site infections and assessment of vancomycin powder as a preventive measure in patients undergoing first-time cranioplasty.

Authors:  Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah; Hsiu-Yin Chiang; Nolan Winslow; Brian Park; Mario Zanaty; Brian J Dlouhy; Oliver E Flouty; Zachary D Rasmussen; Loreen A Herwaldt; Jeremy D Greenlee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 4.  The Materials Utilized in Cranial Reconstruction: Past, Current, and Future.

Authors:  Haley Meyer; Syed I Khalid; Amir H Dorafshar; Richard W Byrne
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 0.558

Review 5.  Predictors of infections following cranioplasty: a retrospective review of a large single center study.

Authors:  Mario Zanaty; Nohra Chalouhi; Robert M Starke; Rohan Chitale; Shannon Hann; Cory D Bovenzi; Mark P Saigh; Eric W Schwartz; Emily S I Kunkel; Alexandra S Efthimiadis-Budike; Pascal Jabbour; Richard Dalyai; Robert H Rosenwasser; Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-10-22

6.  Analysis of the Risk Factors Affecting the Surgical Site Infection after Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Jin Seong Kim; In Sung Park; Sung Kwon Kim; Hyun Park; Dong-Ho Kang; Chul-Hee Lee; Soo-Hyun Hwang; Jin-Myung Jung; Jong-Woo Han
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-10-31

7.  Cranioplasty with autologous cryopreserved bone after decompressive craniectomy: complications and risk factors for developing surgical site infection.

Authors:  J Sundseth; A Sundseth; J Berg-Johnsen; W Sorteberg; K-F Lindegaard
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  The impact of cranioplasty on cerebral blood flow and its correlation with clinical outcome in patients underwent decompressive craniectomy.

Authors:  Jon Kooi Mah; Rosman Azmin Kass
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

9.  Comparison of Complications Following Cranioplasty Using a Sterilized Autologous Bone Flap or Polymethyl Methacrylate.

Authors:  Sung Hoon Kim; Dong Soo Kang; Jin Hwan Cheong; Jung Hee Kim; Kwan Young Song; Min Ho Kong
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-04-30

Review 10.  Review of Cranioplasty after Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Yong Jun Cho; Suk Hyung Kang
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.